Analysing the effectiveness of engagement-promoting techniques in the EFL classroom

Joao Carlos Koch Junior

Abstract


As teachers, we all hope to keep our lessons interesting and our learners engaged. We also know that no two classes are alike. This is mostly due to learners’ individual backgrounds, which teachers commonly keep in mind when they plan and deliver their lessons. Knowledge of what works best to engage a particular group of learners can enable teachers to tailor lessons that focus on their learners’ most prominent characteristics while placing less focus on aspects that are not strongly preferred among the class. In my current teaching situation, it is especially important that the teacher possesses an ability to be spontaneous and improvise; being able to make informed decisions throughout the lesson plays an important role in the choice and implementation of appropriate stimuli. To address these two particularities of my environment (i.e. the lack of formal guidance for peer-based development, and the importance of informed decision-making to generate stimuli in class) I chose to design a method that will allow teachers to conduct observations and collect data on a variety of teacher-generated stimuli in the language classroom. It also should allow the observer to analyse the different stimuli and to enable both teacher and observer to reflect on these stimuli and analyses, and ideally, this new information will help teachers to raise their awareness about different ways to stimulate learning, as well as expand their repertoire of techniques that work in their particular settings.

Keywords


language teaching, teaching techniques, learner engagement, classroom observation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Corno, L., and Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 2, 88-108.

Dornyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and Motivating in the Foreign Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 3, 273-284

Ehrman, M., and Leaver, B. L. (2003a). Cognitive styles in the service of language learning. System, 31, 393-415.

Ehrman, M., Leaver, B. L., and Oxford, R. L. (2003b). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31, 313-330.

Farrell, T. S. C. (2007). Chapter 1: Reflective Language Teaching. Reflective Language Teaching – From Research to Practice. London: Continuum.

Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on Multiple Intelligences: Myths and Messages. The Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 3, 200-203, 206-209.

Richards, J. C., and Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Chapter 6: Peer Observation. Professional Development for Language Teachers – Strategies for Teacher Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge Language Education

Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6, 1, 3-23.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493