Contextualising Computational Thinking: A Case Study in Remote Rural Sarawak Borneo

Nur Hasheena Anuar, Fitri Suraya Mohamad, Jacey-Lynn Minoi

Abstract


The paper describes an exploratory case study on novice indigenous children’s learning characteristics as they learn Computational thinking (CT) competencies, such as abstraction, decomposition, and algorithmic thinking. It employs a quasi-experimental research design with pre-test and post-test instruments. Twenty-two children of an underprivileged Penan community living in a remote village in Sarawak Borneo participated. Through the study, they learned Computational thinking skills using localised instructional strategies, with Scratch™ as their tool to programme. The study used observational field notes, comprehension checks, and participants’ learning products as primary data sources. Findings showed that indigenous children’s learning characteristics were primarily ‘learning-by-making’, collaborative, highly motivated, playful, curious, and imaginative while they attempted to learn Computational thinking. The intervention (treatment) group performed marginally better than the control group in the pre-test and were substantially better in the post-test performance. Findings illustrate a direction in which novice indigenous children could learn and be informed about Computational thinking practices and skills through a mix of game-based learning, collaborative learning, problem-based learning, and project-based learning. Findings also revealed how participants appeared to have gained self-confidence, illustrated creativity on task and were self-critical throughout their participation in the study.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.6


Keywords


Computational thinking; Remote classroom; Indigenous children; Penan community; Case study

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asad, K., Tibi, M., & Raiyn, J. (2016). Primary School Students’ Attitudes toward Learning Programming through Visual Interactive Environments. World Journal of Education, 6(5), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v6n5p20

Baharom, S., & Palaniandy, B. (2013). Problem-Based Learning: A Process for the Acquisition of Learning and Generic Skills. The 4th International Research Symposium on Problem-Based Learning (IRSPBL), 47–55. Retrieved from http://tree.utm.my/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Problem-Based-Learning-A-Process-for-the-Acquisition-of-Learning-and-Generic-Skills.pdf

Berger, D. N. (2019). The Indigenous World 2019. Retrieved from https://www.iwgia.org/en/documents-and-publications/documents/4-the-indigenous-world-2019/file.html

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palinscar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.

Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. AERA, 1–25. Retrieved from https://web.media.mit.edu/~kbrennan/files/Brennan_Resnick_AERA2012_CT.pdf

Cantillon, P., Hutchinson, L., & Wood, D. (2003). ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. London, England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. Retrieved from http://edc.tbzmed.ac.ir/uploads/39/CMS/user/file/56/scholarship/ABC-LTM.pdf

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research planning conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Creswell, J. W., & Piano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 31(4), 388–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x

Durkin, S. S., Fees, R. E., da Rosa, J. A., Murray, M. M., & Moran, A. L. (2018). Unplugged cybersecurity: An approach for bringing computer science into the classroom. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v2i1.21

Grover, S. (2018). The 5th ‘C’ of 21st Century Skills ? Try Computational Thinking (Not Coding). Retrieved from https://www.edsurge.com/news/2018-02-25-the-5th-c-of-21st-century-skills-try-computational-thinking-not-coding

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051

Haseski, H. I., Ilic, U., & Tugtekin, U. (2018). Defining a new 21st Century Skill-Computational Thinking: Concepts and trends. International Education Studies, 11(4), 29. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n4p29

Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers and Education, 126(July), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004

Israel, M., Pearson, J. N., Tapia, T., Wherfel, Q. M., & Reese, G. (2015). Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis. Computers and Education, 82(March), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.022

Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2014). Connected gaming: Towards integrating instructionist and constructionist approaches in K-12 serious gaming. Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS, 1(January), 86–93. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287602204_Connected_gaming_Towards_integrating_instructionist_and_constructionist_approaches_in_K-12_serious_gaming

Kafai Y.B., Burke Q. (2017). Computational participation: Teaching kids to create and connect through code. In Rich P., Hodges C. (eds), Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations (ECTII). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_24

Kazimoglu, C., Kiernan, M., Bacon, L., & MacKinnon, L. (2012). Learning programming at the computational thinking level via digital game-play. Procedia Computer Science, 9(December), 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.04.056

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia [KPM]. (2014). RPT TAHUN 1 KSSR RPT Dunia Sains Dan Teknologi (SK) Tahun 1. Retrieved from http://www.sistemguruonline.my/2014/10/rpt-tahun-1-kssr-rpt-dunia-sains-dan.html

Law, S. (2018) Vitaliy of Mother Tongue Language Among Penan and Chinese Communities in Sarawak. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. Unpublished thesis.

Lin, V. J. (2015). Computational thinking and technology toys (Honors Thesis Collection, Wellesley College). Retrieved from https://repository.wellesley.edu/thesiscollection/307

Ling, U. L., Saibin, T. C., Labidin, J., & Aziz, N. A. (2017). Preliminary investigation: Teachers’ perception of computational thinking concepts. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 9(2), 23–29. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324886429_Preliminary_Investigation_Teachers’_Perception_on_Computational_Thinking_Concepts

Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation [MDEC]. (2019). Who we are. Retrieved from https://mdec.my/about-mdec/who-we-are/

Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/media-cetak/penerbitan/dasar/1207-malaysia-education-blueprint-2013-2025/file

Mohamad, F. S., Yeo, A. W., Abd Aziz, N., & Soubakeavathi, R. (2010). Borneo children in an international digital playground: Intercultural issues and idiosyncrasies. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Intercultural Collaboration (ICIC ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/1841853.1841869

Moschella, M. (2019). Observable computational thinking skills in primary school children: How and when teachers can discern abstraction, decomposition and use of algorithms. INTED2019 Proceedings, 1(March), 6259–6267. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.1523

Mustafa, Z. (2019, March 20). STEM policies set for an evolution. New Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/education/2019/03/471176/stem-policies-set-evolution

Paniagua, A., & Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as designers of learning environments: The importance of innovative pedagogies [e-book]. Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085374-en

Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating Constructionism. Constructionism, 1–17. Retrieved from http://web.media.mit.edu/~calla/web_comunidad/Reading-En/situating_constructionism.pdf

Perković, L., Settle, A., Hwang, S., & Jones, J. (2010). A framework for computational thinking across the curriculum. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education - ITiCSE ’10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1822090.1822126

Robles, G., Barone, D., Brackmann, C. P., Román-González, M., Moreno-León, J., & Casali, A. (2017). Development of computational thinking skills through unplugged activities in primary school. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education (WiPSCE ’17), ACM, November, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137065.3137069

Selby, C. C. (2014). How can the teaching of programming be used to enhance computational thinking skills? (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton, England, United Kingdom). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.04.020

Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x

Unnikrishnan, R., Amrita, N., Muir, A., & Rao, B. (2016). Of elephants and nested loops: How to introduce computing to youth in rural India. In Proceedings of IDC 2016 - The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930678

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118

Wing, J. M. (2010). Computational thinking: What and why?. The link - The Magazine of the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science. Retrieved from https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf

Winner, E., Goldstein, T. R., & Vincent-Lancrin-Stéphan. (1888). Art for art’s sake?: Overview. OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/ART%20FOR%20ART%E2%80%99S%20SAKE%20OVERVIEW_EN_R3.pdf

Xie, Q. (2016). Research design and methods. In English Language Training in the Workplace. Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and prospects, 22, 99–116. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30157-0_5

Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st-century problem-solving in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7

Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872

Zaman, T., & Falak, H. (2019). Framing indigenous knowledge in the digital context: Technologies, methods and tools. International Journal of End-User Computing and Development. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijeucd.2018070103

Zaman, T., Kulathuramaiyer, N., & Yeo, A. W. (2016). eToro: Appropriating ICTs for the management of Penans’ indigenous botanical knowledge. In L. E. Dyson, L. E., S. Grant, & M. Hendriks (eds.), Indigenous people and mobile technologies: Routledge studies in new media and cyberculture (1st ed., pp. 253-264). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/97813157593


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493