Problem-based learning in construction engineering

Pauline Cathleen Machika

Abstract


Structured Abstract:

Aim: The aim of the article is to illustrate how using Problem Based Learning, together with the way in which the content is facilitated, prepares educationally underprepared students in an extended National Diploma over a four year period. This method enables them to complete successfully on par with students who were admitted to the National Diploma in the field of construction engineering.

 

Methodology:  A descriptive, exploratory study was undertaken using quantitative data derived from two cohorts of first-year students who enrolled in 2008 for the National Diploma in Construction Engineering and Extended National Diploma in Construction Engineering at a comprehensive university.

 

Findings: The results of the extended national diploma shows that with adequate exposure to a methodology like PBL success can be obtained for students who have not been previously exposed to science and the field of construction engineering. In addition the results indicate that extended students who are enrolled for an extended programme are able to complete successfully on par with students who are in the mainstream.

 

Practical implications – Some of the benefits of practical application are that students’ develop an understanding of what is expected of them in the course they are studying through PBL, and are engaged in the learning process as team members. Through this process students are taught to discard old habits and to work accurately. By doing so, they realise the importance of quality work on a construction site. Construction engineering students are taught terminology and how to apply it in the field. PBL ensures a closer relationship with the lecturer is developed and as a result students in the course feel free to ask questions and clarify understanding in order to make meaning of the problem.

 

Originality/value – This article adds to the existing strategies to support educationally under-prepared students who are enrolled for extended programmes.

 

 


Keywords


Keywords: Problem-based learning, construction engineering.

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Barkham, J. (2005). Reflections and Interpretations on life in academia: a Mentee speaks, Mentoring and Tutoring, (2), 49-52.

Barrows, H. (2002). Is it really possible to have such a thing as Problem Based Learning?, Distance Education, 23(1), 119-122.

Biggs, J.B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying;. Hawthorn, Victoria,

Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Biggs, S. (1997). Interprofessional collaboration: problems and prospects. In J. Ovretveit, P.

Mathias & T. Thompson (eds). Interprofessional working for health and social care. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.

Biggs, M.A.R. ed, (2002). Research into Practice.

Bridges, E.M. & Hallinger, P. (1995). Implementing problem-based learning in leadership Development. Eugene: University of Oregon, Educational Resources Information Center, Clearinghouse on Educational Management.

Clayton, H.L. (2006). Concept mapping: An effective, active teaching-learning method", in Nursing Education Perspective, (27), 197-203.

Department of Education, (2006). Funding for Foundational Provision in Formally Approved Programmes: 2007/8 to 2009/10.

Enger, K.B., Brenenson. S., Lenn, K., Macmillan, M., Meisart, MF, Meserve, H., & Vella, S.A. (2002), “Problem-based learning: evolving strategies and conversations for library instructionâ€, Reference Services Review, (30)4, 355-358.

Entwistle, N.J., & Smith, C.A. (2002). Personal understanding and target understanding: mapping influences on the outcomes of learning, British Journal of Educational Psychology, (72), 321-342.

Haggis, T. (2006). Pedagogies for diversity: retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down’. Studies in Higher Education, (31)5, 521-535.

Inglis, M., Kirkwood, T., Downs, C.T., & Parkinson, J. (2007). Writing their way into Science: gaining access to the discourse of Biology. SAALT Journal for Language Teaching. (41)1, 82-99.

Jacobs, C., & Miller, S. (2002). An integrated approach to Project Work – An Exploration of Assessment Practices from a Lecturer Perspective. Conference proceedings of the 3rd South African Conference on Engineering Education held in Durban, South Africa.

Jacobs, C., & Jacobs, K. (2002). An Integrated Approach to the Curriculum at Foundation Level. Conference proceedings of the 3rd South African Conference on Engineering Education held in Durban, South Africa.

Keebaugh, A, Darrow, L, Tan, D, & Jamerson, H. (2009). International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (2)1, 118-126.

Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, (7)3, 255-275.

Kember, D, & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning’, Journal of Higher Education, (65)1, 59-74.

Knight, P, & Trowler, P. ( 2000). Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Studies in Higher Education, (25)1, 69-83.

Krause, K. (2006). Transition to and through the first year: Strategies to enhance the student experience. Keynote paper at The University of the Sunshine Coast Inaugural Vice-Chancellor’s Learning and Teaching Colloquium, May.

Lahteenmaki, M.L. (2001). Problem-based learning during the first academic year, in Little, P. and Kandlbinder, P. (eds), The Power of Problem-Based Learning, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 73-84.

Lave, J, & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lemke, J.J. (1990). Talking Science: Language Learning Values. Norwood, New Jersey, Ablex.

Pretorius, E.J. (2005). What do students do when they read to learn?’ Lessons from five case studies. South African Journal of Higher Education, (19)4, 790- 812.

Prosser, M, & Trigwell, K . (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. The experience in higher education (Buckingham, Open University Press).

Scott, I, Yeld, N, & Hendry, J. (2007). A case for improving teaching and learning in South African higher education. HEQC/CHED Improving Teaching and Learning for Success project report.

Taylor, N, & Vinjevold, P. (1999). Getting Learning right: Report of the President’s Education Initiative Research Project. Witwatersrand: Joint Education Trust.

Trigwell, K, Prosser, M, & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, (37), 57–70.

Walker, A, Bridges, E, & Chan, B. (1996). Wisdom gained, wisdom given: instituting PROBLEM BASED LEARNING in a Chinese cultureâ€, Journal of Educational Administration, (34)5, 12-31.

Yeo, R. (2005). Problem-based learning: a suitable approach in tertiary education?, in Tan, K, Mok, J, Lee, M & R Ravindran (eds), Problem-based Learning: New Directions and Approaches, Temasek Centre for Problem Based Learning, Temasek Centre for Problem.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493