Developing Interaction in ESL Classes: An Investigation of Teacher-Student Interaction of Teacher Trainees in a Sri Lankan University

Abdul Majeed Mohamed Navaz

Abstract


his study examines the possibility of using of IRF (Initiation-Response-Follow-up) sequence of teacher-student interaction in Sri Lankan ESL (English as a Second Language) classes for developing longer interactional exchanges which are believed to be useful for language development. Usually, in Sri Lankan ESL classes, teachers ask more display questions and a few referential questions. As a result, teacher-student interaction occurs only occasionally and they follow the traditional IRF pattern with an evaluation at the third move. Teachers could develop longer interactional exchanges by giving follow-up questions or prompts at the third move of the IRF sequence so that students respond, elaborate, explain or prolong their responses. This study examines how the teacher trainees on their teaching practice of a TESL degree programme at a university interacted with their students in ESL classes and how they changed their pattern of interaction to sustain more student interaction. Using lecture discourse data as the basis of the analysis, this study evaluated the changes after an intervention that focussed on training the teacher trainees in developing longer interactional episodes. The results revealed that there was only a slight improvement in the way teacher trainees maintained interactions in the lessons after the intervention. Hence, this study enlightens the possibility of utilizing interaction for language development through intensive teacher training. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.2.10


Keywords


questions; ESL classes; interaction; IRF; teacher trainees

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brock, C. A. (1986). The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586388

Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. C. (2015). Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(3), 272–295. https://doi:10.1080/09500782.2011.597861

Chang, F. (2009). How teacher questioning behaviours assist and affect language teaching and learning in EFL classrooms in Taiwan [PhD Thesis, University of Warwick]. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b2282533~S9

Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171

Cullen, R. (2002). Supportive teacher talk: the importance of the F move. ELT Journal, 56(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.2.117

Davidson, C., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2020). Producing and closing down multiple-response sequences during whole-class talk in an early years classroom. Language and Education, 34(3), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2019.1689995

Edwards-Groves, C. (2014). Talk moves: A Repertoire of practices for productive classroom dialogue. PETAA Paper, 195, 1–12.

Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/3588504

Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English Language Learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Gupta, A., & Lee, G. L. (2015). Dialogic teaching approach with English language learners to enhance oral language skills in the content areas. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(5), 10-17. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/teaching-learning_fac_pubs/19

Hall, J. K. (1998). Differential teacher attention to learner utterances: The construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF. Linguistics and Education, 9(3), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(97)90003-6

Hall, J. K., & Verplaetse, L. S. (Eds.) (2000). Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hall, J. K., & Walsh, M. (2002). Teacher-student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000107

Haneda, M. (2005). Some functions of triadic dialogue in the classroom: Examples from L2 research. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 62(2), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1353/cml.2006.0003

Haneda, M., & Wells, G. (2010). Learning science through dialogic inquiry: Is it beneficial for English-as-additional-language students? International Journal of Educational Research, 49(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2010.05.003

Hellermann, J. (2003). The interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange: teacher repetition in feedback moves. Language in Society, 32(1), 79—104. https://doi.org/ 10.10170S0047404503321049

Hu, G., & Duan, Y. (2018). Questioning and responding in the classroom: a cross-disciplinary study of the effects of instructional mediums in academic subjects at a Chinese university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(3), 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1493084

Hu, G., & Li, X. (2017). Asking and answering questions in English-medium instruction classrooms: What is the cognitive and syntactic complexity level? In J. Zhao & L. Q. Dixon (Eds.), English medium instruction in Chinese universities: Perspectives, discourse and evaluation. (pp. 184-203). New York: Routledge.

Karunaratne, I. M. (2003, November 28–30). Teaching English in urban Sri Lanka: Some pedagogical issues. 9th International Conference on Sri Lankan Studies, Matara, Sri Lanka.

Lee, Y. (2007). Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(6), 1204–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.003

Lemke, J. L. (1985). Using language in the classroom. Deakin University Press.

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Liu, Y. (2008). Teacher–student talk in Singapore Chinese language classrooms: A case study of initiation/response/follow-up (IRF). Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(1), 87-102, https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790701850071

Long, M. H. (1981) Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz, (Ed.) Native Language and Foreign Language Acquisition (pp. 259-278). New York Academy of Sciences.

Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. M. Gass & C. Madden, (Eds.) Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Morell, T. (2004). Interactive lecture discourse for university EFL students. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(03)00029-2

Musumeci, D. (1996). Teacher-learner negotiation in content-based instruction: Communication at cross-purposes? Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 286–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.3.286

Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What’s the use of triadic dialogue. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 376–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.376

Navaz, A. M. M. (2012). lecturer-student interaction in English-medium science lectures: an investigation of perceptions and practice at a Sri Lankan university where English is a second language [PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham]. http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12995/

Navaz, A. M. M. (2013). A study on perception of lecturer – student interaction in english medium science lectures. Novitas – ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 7(2), 117-136. https://novitasroyal.org/download/a-study-on-perception-of-lecturer-student-interaction-in-english-medium-science-lectures/

Navaz, A. M. M. (2020). Developing a framework for understanding lecturer-student interaction in English-medium undergraduate lectures in Sri Lanka: First step towards dialogic teaching. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(6), 208-229. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n6p395

Perera, M. E. (2001). The role of classroom interaction in second language acquisition in Sri Lanka [Doctoral thesis, University of Wollongong, Australia]. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/1805

Quality Assurance Process - Peer Observation. (2020). Observation of ESL classes conducted by an Instructor.

Samaranayake, S. W. (2016). Oral Competency of ESL/EFL Learners in Sri Lankan Rural School Context. SAGE Open, April-June, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016654202

Sanmuganathan, K. (2017). Historical perspective of English and some pedagogical problems and solutions in teaching English in Sri Lankan schools. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(6), 623-629. http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0617/ijsrp-p6678.pdf

Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.

Skinner, B. (2019). ‘Let’s move on’: second language trainee teachers’ talk and its impact on learner interaction. The language learning journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1642371

Smith, H., & Higgins, S. (2006). Opening classroom interaction: the importance of feedback. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(4), 485-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640601048357

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.) Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics (125-144). Oxford University Press.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(iii), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x

Teo, P. (2016). Exploring the dialogic space in teaching: A study of teacher talk in the preuniversity classroom in Singapore. Teaching and Teacher Education. 56, 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.019

Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge University Press.

University Grants Commission. (2018). Tracer study of graduates in Sri Lankan universities. Colombo: University Grants Commission.

Van Lier, L. (2001). Constraints and resources in classroom talk: Issues of equality and symmetry. In C. Candlin & N. Mercer (Eds.) English language teaching in its social context: A reader (90-107). Routledge.

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse language in action. Routledge.

Waring, H. (2009). Moving out of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.2009.59.issue-4

Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(05)80001-4

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press.

Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3

Wood, D. (1992). Teaching talk. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the national oracy project (203-214). Hodder & Stoughton (for the National Curriculum Council).

Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2009). ‘Very good’ as a teacher response. ELT Journal, 63(3), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn042

Yip, D. Y. (2004). Questioning skills for conceptual change in science instruction. Journal of Biological Education, 38(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.20


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493