Effect of Accounting Lecturer Behavior on the Level of Online Learning Outcomes Achievement

Alwan Sri Kustono, Wahyu Agus Winarno, Ardhya Yudistira Adi Nanggala

Abstract


Changes in learning models in reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic have a significant impact on how accounting is taught. The objective of this study was to compare the differences in learning outcomes before and during the pandemic. A total of 367 research participants were collecting and the data were analyzed using the Partial Least Square – Structural Equation Modelling approach. Additional testing to control the demographic variable shows that the demographic variable is not a determinant of learning outcome achievement. The results showed that anxiety reduces the ease of use, and external control perception positively affects it. The theoretical implication is that the online learning outcome increases depending on user behavior variables. Technology acceptance variables are a mediation between personality variables and online learning. Other constructions of the TAM model have been empirically proven. The level of achievement before the pandemic is higher than during the pandemic. These results indicate that the implementation of online learning is more effective if it has been prepared from the beginning. The practical implication is to achieve a good outcome. A university must reduce anxiety and increase the positive control of the external perception of each lecturer.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.3.11


Keywords


online learning playfulness; ease of use; self-efficacy; usefulness; behavioral intention to use; achievement of learning outcome

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036

Achim, N., & Kassim, A. Al. (2015). Computer Usage: The Impact of Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-efficacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.422

Adetimirin, A. (2015). An empirical study of online discussion forums by library and information science postgraduate students using technology acceptance model 3. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14(2015), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.28945/2269

Ajmal, M., & Ahmad, S. (2019). Exploration of Anxiety Factors among Students of Distance Learning : A Case Study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(2), 67–78.

Al-Azawei, A., & Lundqvist, K. (2015). Learner differences in perceived satisfaction of an online learning: An extension to the technology acceptance model in an arabic sample. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(5), 408–426.

Al Kurdi, B., Alshurideh, M., Salloum, S. A., Obeidat, Z. M., & Al-dweeri, R. M. (2020). An Empirical Investigation into Examination of Factors Influencing University Students’ Behavior towards Elearning Acceptance Using SEM Approach. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 14(02), 19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i02.11115

Amer, A.-A., Ahmad, A.-A., & Jo, S. (2013). Exploring Students Acceptance of E-learning Using Technology Acceptance Model in Jordanian Universities. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(2), 4–18. http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=1617

Ayeni, A. J., & Akinfolarin, C. A. (2014). Assessing Principals’ Coordinating and Controlling Strategies for Effective Teaching and Quality Learning Outcome in Secondary Schools in Ondo State , Nigeria. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 7(1), 180–200.

Chahine, I. C., & Khan, F. (2015). Improving the Quality of Learning Outcomes and Enhancing the Performance of Education Systems : A Case Study in Kuwait. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 10(1), 1–21.

Chen, J. K. (2018). The influence of behavioural intention on third-party e-commerce payment. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.2157

Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–15.

Cigdem, H., & Ozturk, M. (2016). Factors affecting students’ behavioral intention to use LMS at a Turkish post-secondary vocational school. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(3), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2253

Clair, D. S. (2015). A Simple Suggestion for Reducing First-time Online Student Anxiety. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 151(2005), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132886

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

Dumpit, D. Z., & Fernandez, C. J. (2017). Analysis of the use of social media in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) using the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0045-2

Feriady, M., Nurkhin, A., Mahmud, N., Setiani, R., & Astuti, D. P. (2020). Influence of organizational suport and digital literacy on lecturer acceptance of e-learning in indonesia: A modification of technologi acceptance model. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 2229–2233.

Gbongli, K., Xu, Y., & Amedjonekou, K. M. (2019). Extended technology acceptance model to predict mobile-based money acceptance and sustainability: A multi-analytical structural equation modeling and neural network approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(13), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133639

Hanif, A., Jamal, F. Q., & Ahmed, N. (2018). Behavioral Intention for Adopting Technology Enhanced Learning Initiatives in Universities. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 28(1), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Hanum, N. S. (2013). The effectiveness of e-learning as a learning model (evaluation study in SMK Telkom Sandhy Putra Purwokerto). Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 3(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v3i1.1584

Ho, K. F., Ho, C. H., & Chung, M. H. (2019). Theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance of the nursing process information system. PLoS ONE, 14(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217622

Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00035-6

Igbaria, M., & Livari, J. (1995). The Effects of Self-efficacy on Computer Usage. OMEGA - The International Journal of Management Science, 23(8), 587–605.

Kustono, A. S. (2020). How Total Quality Management Mediates Antecedent Variables of Employee Performance? The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.523

Kustono, A. S., & Nanggala, A. Y. A. (2020). Preparing quality financial statements at health centers: to explore the role of regional inspectorates and professionalism of accounting personnel. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v10i1.1878

Kustono, A. S., Nanggala, A. Y. A., & Mas’ud, I. (2020). Determinants of the Use of E-Wallet for Transaction Payment among College Students. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 23(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v23i1.2245

Lai, P. (2017). the Literature Review of Technology Adoption Models and Theories for the Novelty Technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/s1807-17752017000100002

Lin, M. H., Chen, H. C., & Liu, K. S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553–3564. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a

Majid, F. (2012). A Study on the Online Language Learning Anxiety among Adult Learners. International Journal of E-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.7763/ijeeee.2012.v2.106

Mohammadi, S., & Isanejad, O. (2018). Presentation of the extended technology acceptance model in sports organizations. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 6(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.32410/huj.10079

Muchlas. (2013). Development of Online Learning Models for Digital Engineering Practices in Higher Education. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Nagy, J. T. (2018). Evaluation of online video usage and learning satisfaction: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(1), 160–185. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2886

Nambi, R. (2019). Adopting a TEDDIE learning design model to plan blended teaching activities: Reflections from a teacher trainees’ poetry lecture. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(3), 164–185. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.3.9

Nanggala, A. Y. A. (2020). Use of Fintech for Payment : Approach to Technology Acceptance Model Modified. Journal of Contemporary Information Technology, Management, and Accounting, 1(1), 1–8.

Nortvig, A. M., Petersen, A. K., & Balle, S. H. (2018). A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 16(1), 45–55.

Oturakci, M., & Oturakci, M. (2018). Developing New Technology Acceptance Model With Multi-Criteria Decision Technique: An Implementation Study. Engineering Management Research, 7(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.5539/emr.v7n2p43

Pablico, J. (2017). Differentiated Instruction in the High School Science Classroom : Qualitative Differentiated Instruction in the High School Science Classroom : Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational, 16(7), 30–54.

Pham, C. H., Vu, N. H., & Tran, G. T. H. (2020). The role of e-learning service quality and e-trust on e-loyalty. Management Science Letters, 10(12), 2741–2750. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.4.036

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. In Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 87, Issue 4, pp. 698–714). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698

Siegel, D., Acharya, P., & Sivo, S. (2017). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Improve Usage & Decrease Resistance toward a New Technology by Faculty in Higher Education. Journal of Technology Studies, 43(2), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v43i2.a.1

Yuwana, A. M., & Kustono, A. S. (2017). Why is User "s Expertise Important for Implementation of Regional Asset Information Systems: Case in Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(7), 377–379. https://doi.org/10.21275/art20175027


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493