Assessment for Learning: How Plagiarism could be used as an Efficient Learning Tool

Lucia Morales, Amparo Soler Dominguez

Abstract


Instructors should consider the role of responsible feedback as one of the main priorities of their teaching and learning strategies. It is well known that feedback is the bridge between students and instructors, as students’ work is reviewed and put into an appropriate learning context. In this context, we argue that detecting plagiarism should be an additional vehicle to allow students achieve settled academic standards. Plagiarism detection tools should be used to encourage students to follow best practices, and at the same time inspire and guide students to work harder. In this regard, quality feedback plays a crucial role in identifying areas of weaknesses in standards of writing, which should be considered carefully by instructors when guiding their students to comply with academic rules and standards. We must not forget that students are learners that need tutoring, mentoring, objective and clear guidelines that keep them focused and motivated, and this also applies to adhering to academic integrity. Accordingly, we argue that instructors’ feedback should also address academic integrity in an efficient and constructive manner. Plagiarism has very negative connotations in academia, and must be monitored. However, in this context, the following questions remain pertinent: What kind of action is required to prevent plagiarism? How can instructors use plagiarism as another tool to motivate and guide their students? What way can plagiarism be used for constructive learning and not as a way to punish students? We believe that the answers lie in responsible feedback. We explore the use of plagiarism as a constructive tool that can make a difference in the learning experience. We aim to offer an initial view of how instructors could shift from using plagiarism as a source of punishing students to a more constructive and positive end.


Keywords


Assessment for Learning, Responsible Feedback, Plagiarism, Student Motivation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Childs, S. (2001). Editorial: Web dependency plagiarism. Health Information on the Internet. The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd., 21, pp.1-2

McCabe, D. (2001). Student cheating in American high schools’, Educause (online), Available from: http://www.academicintegrity.org (Accessed: December 2013)

Marsden, H., Carroll, M. And Neill, J. (2005). Who cheats at University? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian University students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), pp. 1-10.

Furedi, F. (2003). Shortcut to success. Times Higher Education Supplement, July 25, p. 16.

Nonis, S., and Swift, C. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation for Business, 75(6), pp. 321-330.

BBC News (2012). [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/18962349. [Accessed December 2013].

BBC News (2012). [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17586128 [Accessed December 2013]

Spiegel Online International (2011). [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/plagiarism-affair-defense-minister-guttenberg-resigns-a-748330.html [Accessed January 2014)

International Business Times (2012). [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.ibtimes.com/another-prominent-european-politician-accused-plagiarism-romanian-pm-denies-charges-703412 [Accessed January 2014)

The Guardian (2013). [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/feb/09/german-education-minister-quits-phd-plagiarism [Accessed January 2014)

The New York Times (2013). [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/11/world/europe/11iht-educside11.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 [Accessed January 2014)

The New York Times (2013) [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/11/world/europe/11iht-educside11.html?pagewanted=all [Accessed January 2014]

Stappenbelt, B. and Rowles, C. (2009). The effectiveness of plagiarism detection software as a learning tool in academic writing education. 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity (4APCEI) [online]. 28–30 September 2009 University of Wollongong NSW Australia [accessed 23 June 2011]. Available at http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=apce

Delvin, M. and Gray, K. (2007). In their own words: A qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize. Higher Education Research & Development, 26, pp.181–198.

White, F., Owens, C., Nguyen, M. (2008). Using a constructive feedback approach to effectively reduce student plagiarism among first-year psychology students. UniServe Science Symposium 2008, Sydney, NSW, Australia: Uniserve Science.

Badge, J.J., Cann, A.J. and Scott, J. (2007). To cheat or not to cheat? A trial of the JISC plagiarism detection software service with biological sciences students. Assessment and Education in Higher Education, 32, pp.433–439.

Vinod K.R., Sandhya.S, Sathish Kumar D, Harani A, David Banji and Otilia JF Banji. (2011). Plagiarism History, Detection and Prevention. Hygeia journal for drugs and medicines, 3(1), pp. 1-4.

Royce, J. (2003). Has Turnitin.com Got It All Wrapped Up? Teacher Librarian, 30(4), pp. 26-30.

Hansen, B. (2003). Combating Plagiarism. CQ Researcher, 13(32), pp.773-796.

Landau, J.D., Druen, P.B., and Arcuri, J.A. (2002). Methods for helping students avoid plagiarism. Teaching of Methods for helping students avoid plagiarism. Teaching of Psychology, 29, pp.112–115.

Yeo, S. (2007) First-year university science and engineering students’ understanding of plagiarism. Higher Education Research & Development, 26, pp.199–216.

Underwood, J. and Szabo, A. (2003) Academic offences and e-learning: Individual propensities in cheating. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, pp.467–77.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493