Exploring Instances of Deleuzian Rhizomatic Patterns in Students’ Writing and in Online Student Interactions
Abstract
Globally, it is a standard practice to study students’ academic writing by using linear academic-writing models. This study investigated instances of Deleuzian rhizomatic patterns in students’ writing and in online student interactions at an open and distance e-learning (ODeL) institution in South Africa. A convenience sample of 13 students’ paragraph writing samples and of 370 first-year students was used. All the participants were enrolled in a level-one module, ENG1503, in the second semester of 2020. The study followed a mixed-method approach, and utilized AntConc and AntMover to analyse the students’ writing samples, as well as Microsoft Power Business Intelligence (MS Power BI) and Gephi, in order to analyse and visualise online student interactions. When students’ writing samples were analysed in terms of keywords (e.g., key themes) by using the software applications employed in this study, various rhizomatic patterns were detected in the students’ text files. For example, the key-word frequencies of key themes, such as religion and cult, showed that these two key themes were used differently at the end of each concordance spectrum, thereby underscoring their varying rhizomatic patterns of usage in students’ respective text files. Online student interactions on both myUnisa’s ODF and MS Teams were visualized rhizomatically. The findings of this study underscore the importance of investigating and analysing students’ writing – not only from linear models, but also from non-linear perspectives, such as a rhizomatic approach. Additionally, they underline the significance of leveraging the opportunities offered by students’ writing analysis technologies, such as those employed in this study.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.10.1
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abarghooeinezhad, M., & Simin, S. (2015). Analyses of verb tense and voice of research article abstracts in engineering journals. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 47, 139–152. http://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.47.139
Alvi, U. F., Mehmood, M. A., & Rasool, S. (2017). Identification of moves structure in the discussion section of social sciences doctoral research theses. Linguistics and Literature Review, 3(1), 43–51. http://doi.org/10.32350/llr.v3i1.265
Amorim, A. C., & Ryan, C. (2005). Deleuze, action research and rhizomatic growth. Educational Action Research, 13(4), 581–594. http://doi.org/10.1080/09650790500200346
Bagarinao, R. T. (2015). Students’ navigational pattern and performance in an e-learning environment: A case from UP Open University, Philippines. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 101–111. http://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.47684
Bangou, F. (2019). Experimenting with creativity, immigration, language, power, and technology: A research agency. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(2), 82–92. http://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00015
Bhatti, I. A., Mustafa, S., & Azher, M. (2019). Genre analysis of research article abstract in linguistics and literature: A cross disciplinary study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(4), 42-50. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n4p42
Bikelien?, L. (2017). The use of “then” in Lithuanian learners’ English. Verbum, 8, 104-111. http://doi.org/10.15388/Verb.2017.8.11349
Boyle, J., Ramsay, S., & Struan, A. (2019). The academic writing skills programme: A model for technology-enhanced, blended delivery of an academic writing programme. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(4), https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol16/iss4/4
Bozkurt, A., Honeychurch, S., Caines, A., Bali, M., Koutropoulos, A., & Cormier, D. (2016). Community tracking in a cMOOC and nomadic learner behavior identification on a connectivist rhizomatic learning network. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(4), 4–30. http://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.09231
Brailas, A. (2020a). Rhizomatic Learning in action: a virtual exposition for demonstrating learning rhizomes. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 1-14. ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436565
Brailas, A. (2020b). Designed to allow for emergence: A learning rhizome. Research Catalogue. http://doi.org/10.22501/rc.782366
Buchal, R., & Songsore, E. (2019). Using Microsoft Teams to support collaborative knowledge building in the context of sustainability assessment. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/PCEEA/article/view/13882/8994
Celce-Murcia & Larsen-Freeman. (1998). The Grammar book: ESL/EFL teacher’s course (2nd Edition). Heinle & Heinle.
Çelik, S. (2020). Building critical academic writing skills: The impact of instructor feedback on Turkish ELT graduate students. TESL-EJ, 24(3), 1-18. http://tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej95/a4.pdf
Chaka, C., & Nkhobo, T. (2019). Online module login data as a proxy measure of student engagement: the case of myUnisa, MoyaMA, Flipgrid, and Gephi at an ODeL institution in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), Art. 38. http://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0167-9
Christensen, L., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, design, and analysis, global edition. Pearson.
Conde, M. Á., Hérnandez-García, Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Séin-Echaluce, M. L. (2015). Exploring student interactions: Learning analytics tools for student tracking. In P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou (Eds,), Learning and collaboration technologies. LCT 2015. Lecture notes in computer science, (pp. 50–61). Springer: Cham. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_6
Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate: Journal of online education, 4(5), Art. 2. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ840362
Cumming, T. (2015). Challenges of ‘thinking differently with rhizo-analytic approaches: A reflexive account. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(2), 137-148. http://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.896892
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Diamante, J. T. (2020). The morphology and semantics of conjuncts: The case of MA theses in the Philippine setting. Modern Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Literature, 2(1). https://www.mjselt.com/mjselt/mjselt-2020/
Du Toit, J. A. (2020). Trajectories of learning: The use of multimodal resources to enhance academic writing development in open and distance e-learning. https://scholar.sun.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10019.1/107747/dutoit_trajectories_2020.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
Dutra, D. P., da Silva Queiroz, J., & Alves, J. C. (2017). Adding information in argumentative texts: a learner corpus-based study of additive linking adverbials. Revista Estudos Anglo-Americanos, 46(1), 9–32.
Elashri, E. A. E., & Ibrahim, I. (2013). The effect of the genre-based approach to teaching writing on the EFL Al-Azhr secondary students’ writing skills and their attitudes towards writing. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539137.pdf
Estacio, R. R., & Raga Jr, R. C. (2017). Analyzing students online learning behavior in blended courses using Moodle. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 12(1), 52–68. http://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2017-0016
Flowerdew, J. (2019). The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality. Language Teaching, 52(2), 249-260. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000041
Ganobcsik-Williams, L. (Ed.). (2006). Teaching academic writing in UK higher education: Theories, practices and models. Palgrave.
Gardner, S., Nesi, H., & Biber, D. (2019). Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 646-674. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005
Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43, 277-303. http://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125
Guerin, C., (2013). Rhizomatic research cultures, writing groups and academic researcher identities. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 137-150. http://doi.org/10.28945/1897
Gustina, A. R., 2020. Move analysis of undergraduate theses and undergraduate students’ published research articles abstracts. http://repository.upi.edu/53620/1/S_ING_1602411_Title.pdf
Hanley, C. (2019). Thinking with Deleuze and Guattari: An exploration of writing as assemblage. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(4), 413-423. doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1472574
Heigham, J., & Croker, R. (Eds.) (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction. Springer.
Honan, E. (2009). Fighting the rip: Using digital texts in classrooms. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 21–35. http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/files/2009v8n3art2.pdf
Iyer, R. (2018). The rhizomes of academic practice: Culturally and linguistically diverse students negotiating learning and belonging. Decentering the Researcher in Intimate Scholarship (Advances in Research on Teaching, 31, 123–136. http://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-368720180000031010
Johnson, S. (2014). Deleuze’s philosophy of difference and its implications for ALL practices. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(1), A62–A69. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/311
Johnston, K., 2018. (Re)imagining possibilities for youth in schools: A rhizomatic exploration of youth’s affective engagements with literacy. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8903GB7
Kairien?, A., & Mažeikien?, N. (2021). The assemblages of rhizomatic learning of English of secondary school students. Proceedings of EDULEARN21 Conference (pp. 1576-1585). IATED. http://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021
Karatay, Y. (2019). The use of linking adverbials in l2 writing: Timed vs. untimed essays. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340224238_The_Use_of_Linking_Adverbials_in_L2_Writing_Timed_vs_Untimed_Essays
Karavas, E., & Zorbas, V. (2019). Academic writing in distance learning programs: The tutors’ perspective (?????????? ????? ?? ?? ?????????? ???????????: ? ?????? ??? ?????????????). Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 21-30.
Kinchin, I. M., & Gravett, K. (2020). Concept mapping in the age of Deleuze: Fresh perspectives and new challenges. Education Sciences, 10(3), 82. http://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030082
Ko, D., & Bal, A. (2019). Rhizomatic research design in a smooth space of learning rupturing, connecting, and generating. Critical Education, 10(17), 1-20.
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in higher education, 23(2), 157–172. http://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
Leander, K. and Boldt, G., 2013. Rereading “A pedagogy of multi-literacies” bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22-46. http://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12468587
Lillis, T. (2003). Student writing as ‘academic literacies’: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and education, 17(3), 192-207. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666848
Lubis, A. H. (2020). The argumentation structure of research article ‘findings and discussion’ sections written by non-native English speaker novice writers: A case of Indonesian undergraduate students. Asian Englishes, 22(2), 143-162. http://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2019.1669300
Mackness, J., Bell, F., & Funes, M. (2016.) The rhizome: A problematic metaphor for teaching and learning in a MOOC. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1). http://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2486
Manyike, T. V. (2017). Postgraduate supervision at an open distance e-learning institution in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 37(2), 1-11. http://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n2a1354
Martin, A. D., & Strom, K. J. (2017). Using multiple technologies to put rhizomatics to work in self-study. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Being self-study researchers in a digital world (pp. 151-164). Springer.
Mashile, E. O., Fynn, A., & Matoane, M. (2020). Institutional barriers to learning in the South African open distance learning context. South African Journal of Higher Education, 34(2), 129-145. http://doi.org/10.20853/34-2-3662
Masny, D. (2012). Multiple literacies theory: Discourse, sensation, resonance and becoming. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33(1), 113-128. http://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2012.632172
Mitchell, K. M., McMillan, D. E., Lobschuk, M. M., Nickel, N. C., Rabbani, R., & Li, J. (2021). Development and validation of the Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (SAWSES). Assessing Writing, 48, 1-20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100524
Niyibizi, E., Sibomana, E., & Peruma, J. (2019). Learning to teach writing through a distance education programme: Experiences of Rwandan secondary school English teachers. Reading & Writing, 10(1), a206. http://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v10i1.206
Onah, D. F., Sinclair, J., Boyatt, R., & Foss, J. (2014). Massive open online courses: Learner participation. Paper in Proceeding of the 7th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (pp. 2348-2356). http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1222.3520
Ouma, R. (2019). Transforming university learner support in open and distance education: Staff and students’ perceived challenges and prospects. Cogent Education, 6(1). http://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1658934
Pashapour, A., Ghaemi, F., & Hashamdar, M. (2018). A structural move analysis of research article introduction sub-genre: A comparative study of native and Iranian writers in applied linguistics. International Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 79-106.
Pendar, N., & Cotos, E. (2008). Automatic identification of discourse moves in scientific article introductions. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W08-0908.pdf
Riazi, M. (2016). The Routledge Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Routledge.
Richards, K., Ross, S., & Seedhouse, P. (2012). Research methods for applied language studies: An advanced resource book for students. London: Routledge.
Seaboyer, J., & Barnett, T. (2019). New perspectives on reading and writing across the disciplines. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(1), 1-10. http://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1544111
Schleppegrell, M., & Achugar, M. (2003). Learning language and learning history: A functional linguistics approach. TESOL Journal, 12(2), 21-27. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.1949-3533.2003.tb00126.x.
Schleppegrell, M. J., & Go, A. L. (2007). Analyzing the writing of English learners: A functional approach. Language arts, 84(6), 529-538.
Sellers, M. (2015). .…working with (a) rhizo-analysis…and working (without) rhizo-analysis. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 12(1), 6–31. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1074505.pdf
Sherbine, K. (2019). Wrestling with competency and everyday literacies in school. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 15(2), 1–22. https://www.academia.edu/40983793/Sherbine_K_2019_Wrestling_with_competency_and_everyday_literacies_in_school_Journal_of_Language_and_LiteracyEducation_15_2_1_2
Tagata, W. M., & Ribas, F. C. (2021). Rethinking digital literacy practices and educational agendas in times of Covid-19 uncertainty (Repensando práticas de letramento digital e agendas educacionais em tempos de incerteza da Covid-19). Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 21(2), 399-431. http://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6398202117285
Tillmanns, T., & Filho, A. S. (2020). Reflecting on partnerships of sustainability learning: Enacting a Lewin–Deleuze–Guattari rhizome. Sustainability, 12, 9776. http://doi.org/10.3390/su12229776
Tuan, L.T. (2011). Teaching writing through a genre-based approach. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 1(11), 1471–1478. http://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.11.1471-1478
Turmudi, D. (2020). Utilizing a web-based technology in blended EFL academic writing classes for university students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1517, 1-11. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1517/1/012063
Ulfa, N. and Muthalib, K.A., 2020. Lexical bundles in students’ essay writing. English Education Journal, 11(3), 367-379.
Van Rooy, B., & Coetzee-Van Rooy, S. (2015). The language issue and academic performance at a South African university. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 33, 31-46. 10.2989/16073614.2015.1012691
Webb, M. A. (2009). Rhizomatic literacies: Restructuring pedagogy and practice within the freshmen composition classroom. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510705.pdf
Wingate, U., & Tribble, C. (2012). The best of both worlds? Towards an Academic Language and Literacy in English /Academic Literacies writing pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 481-495. http://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.525630
Yaz?c?, E. A., & Ç?rakl?, M. Z. (2019). A stylistic keyword analysis of repetition in Samuel Beckett’s Come and Go. http://conference.nalans.org/
Zamani, G., & Ebadi, S. (2016.) Move analysis of the conclusion sections of research papers in Persian and English. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1), 9-20.
Zhang, P., & Pan, Y. (2020). A comparative study of keywords and sentiments of abstracts by Python programs. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 10(6), 722–739. http://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2020.106044
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493