Killing Two Birds with One Stone? A Study on Achievement Levels and Affective Factors in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL)
Abstract
Despite the burgeoning research evidence on the multifarious effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in academia, only limited empirical evidence can be retrieved from the Chinese context. The intent of this study conducted in a Chinese higher education provider was to probe into the effects of CLIL on English proficiency and learning motivation in the College English Teaching context. Characterised by a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design, this study involved 60 undergraduates who were categorised into either the High-Group, Medium-Group or Low-Group based on their English proficiency. Data were collected from standardised English language tests and a questionnaire on motivation for English learning. Quantitative analyses involving the running of t-tests and ANOVA mainly indicated that: 1) CLIL had a generally positive effect on the participants’ English proficiency and motivation; 2) the participants from the three subgroups all made significant progress in English proficiency with the low achievers showing increased considerable improvement; 3) CLIL negligibly affected the learners’ positive attitude to language learning; 4) the higher achievers appeared to display stronger motivation towards English learning at the end of the study than those with a relatively lower level of English proficiency. It was concluded that CLIL has the potential to benefit language learners of different levels in both effective learning and affective learning, while a critical attitude should be held to the view that CLIL is the panacea for all with an appeal for more classroom-based research to enrich the performance and affective evidence of CLIL.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.4.9
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Blasco, A. B. (2014). L2 English young learners’ oral production skills in CLIL and EFL settings: A longitudinal study (Publication No. 9788449050886) [Doctoral Dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona]. Theses and Dissertations Online.
Brown, H., & Bradford, A. (2017). EMI, CLIL, & CBI: Differing approaches and goals. In P. Clements, A. Krause & H. Brown (Eds.), Transformation in language education (pp. 328-334). JALT. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19525.04325
Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002
Bruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why…and why not. System, 41(3), 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001
Cañado, M. L. P. (2019). CLIL and elitism: myth or reality? Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1645872
Celik, B. (2019). A comparison of form-focused and meaning-focused instruction types: A study on Ishik University Students in Erbil, Iraq. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 201-228. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n1p201
Chen, X., Webb, J. G. (2017). The CET-4: Encouragement or impediment of undergraduate English testing and learning. International Journal of Education and Human Developments, 3(4), 31-42. https://ijehd.cgrd.org/images/vol3no4/5.pdf
Coyle, D. (2013). Listening to learners: An investigation into successful learning across CLIL contexts. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16, 244–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777384
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 46(4), 545-559. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000256
Dewi, N. I., & Sudarmaji, I. (2020). The effect of Content and Language Integrated Learning on reading comprehension at eleventh grade at Sma Al-Ijtihad in academic year 2018/2019. Foremost Journal, 1(2), 123-133. http://ejournal.unis.ac.id/index.php/Foremost/article/view/782
Gardner, R. (1985). The Attitude Motivation Test Battery: Technical Report 1. University of Western Ontario.
Goris, J. (2019). Content and Language Integrated Learning in English as a foreign language: A European perspective. Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Goris, J., Denessen, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in Europe: A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies. European Educational Research Journal, 18(6), 675-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119872426
Hamidavi, N., Amiz, M. S., & Gorjian, B. (2016). The effect of CLIL method on teaching reading comprehension to junior high school students. Bulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège, 85, 1642-1652. https://doi.org/10.25518/0037-9565.6361
He, D. (2018). Foreign language learning anxiety in China: Theories and applications in English language teaching. Springer.
Hu, H. (2021a). Mapping out the future: A proposal of a CLIL research agenda in China. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(9), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.9.1
Hu, H. (2021b). Dispelling the myth of elitism and establishing the evidence of inclusion: A case of CLIL in online English education amid COVID-19 pandemic. In V. Akerson & M. Shelley (Eds.), Proceedings of IConSES 2021 — International Conference on Social and Education Sciences (pp. 29-50). ISTES Organization.
Indhiarti, T. R., & Sudarwati, E. (2021). An introduction to research methods in applied linguistics: A practical guide. Tim UB Press.
Jäkel, N. (2015). Use and impact of language learning strategies on language proficiency: Investigating the impact of individual difference variables and participation in CLIL streams (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Kamal, A. (2020). A case study on simultaneous teaching of English literature and language in a private university in Bangladesh. In S. Sultana, M. M. Roshid, M. Z. Haider, M. M. N. Kabir & M. H. Khan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language education in Bangladesh (chap. 14). Routledge. http://https//doi.org/10.4324/9780429356803
Kamis, M. S., Ismail, M. J., Alias, M. N., Mikeng, D., Abidin, S. G. Z., & Yusof, R. (2021). CLIL approach in encouraging self-efficacy amongst Malaysian gifted students for Arabic tasks accomplishment. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 1001-1012. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.69
Karabassova, L. (2019). CLIL or “just good teaching” in Kazakhstan? Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada a la Enseñanza de Lenguas, 13(27), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.26378/rnlael1327341
Lasagabster, D. (2020). Motivation in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) research. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 347-366). Palgrave Macmillan.
Li, F., & Xiao, L. (2020). A study on the teaching of professional-oriented English writing in applied-type university based on I Write 2.0. Creative Education, 11, 1720-1729. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.119125
Liu, H. (2019). An action research into task-based CLIL applied to education majors: From Chinese students’ perspective. English Language Teaching, 12(3), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n3p94
Lyster, R. (2006). Form-focused instruction in immersion classrooms. In S. Björklund, K. Mård-Miettinen, M. Bergström & M. Södergård (Eds.), Exploring dual-focused education: Integrating language and content for individual and societal needs (pp. 38-54). University of Vaasa.
Maasum, T. N. R. T. M., Maarof, N., Yamat, H., & Zakaria, E. (2012). An investigation of teachers’ pedagogical skills and content knowledge in a content-based instruction context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v1i2.86
Marsh, D. (2003). The relevance and potential of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) for achieving MT+2 in Europe. University of Jyväskylä.
Martyn, E. R. (2018). Integrating Content and Language in business English teaching in China: First year students’ perceptions and learning experience. English Language Teaching, 11(8), 86-102. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n8p86
Mattheoudakis, M. (2019). Content and Language Integrated Learning in Greece: It’s here to stay. In M. Mattheoudakis & I. Ziaka (Eds.), Promoting CLIL implementation in Europe (pp. 6-27). IKY, Erasmus +.
McDougald, J. (2015). Teachers´ attitudes, perceptions and experiences in CLIL: A look at content and language. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 17(1), 25-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2015.1.a02
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning and multilingual education. Macmillan Education.
Mewald, C. (2007). A comparison of oral foreign language performance of learners in CLIL and mainstream classes at lower secondary level in Lower Austria. In C. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse (pp. 139-178). Peter Lang.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2007). College English Curriculum Requirements. Higher Education Press.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2020). Guidelines for College English Teaching. Higher Education Press.
Ostovar-Namaghi, S. A., & Nakhaee, S. (2019). The effect of CLIL on language skills and components: A meta-Analysis. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 109-144. https://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3030-en.pdf
Paran, A. (2013). Content and language integrated learning: Panacea or policy borrowing myth? Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0014
Pižorn, K. (2017). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): A panacea for young English language learners? In J. Enever & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Early language learning: Complexity and mixed methods (pp. 145-163). Oxford University Press.
Pradeep, K. (2021). A short handbook of qualitative research. Bluerose Publishers.
Setiawan, J. E. (2013). Teacher's belief and student's perception regarding Content and Language Integrated Learning: A case study at SMA YPVDP Bontang (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Mulawarman University.
Suliman, A., Nor, M. Y. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2018). Gleaning into students’ perspectives in learning science and mathematics using the English language. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, (2), 445-456. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi2.445.456
Suliman, A., Nor, M. Y. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2020). Illuminating students’ understanding and acceptance towards the Dual Language Programme (DLP). Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 522-531. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.30760
Qi, J. (2021). Some important relations in College English Teaching. Sino-US English Teaching, 18(12), 359-362. https://doi.org/10.17265//1539-8072/2021.12.003
Urgal, C. C. (2019). Law and business students’ attitudes towards learning English for specific purposes within CLIL and non-CLIL contexts. Languages, 4(2), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020045
Wang, K. (2017). Xinghuo Yingyu: Yingyu Liuji Zhenti [Spark English: Authentic CET-6 papers]. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
Wang, W., & Xu, H. (2020). 2018 Nian Zhongguo Waiyu Jiaoyu Niandu Baogao [2018 China Foreign Language Education Annual Report]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Yang, W. (2015). Content and Language Integrated Learning next in Asia: Evidence of learners’ achievement in CLIL education from a Taiwan tertiary degree programme. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(4), 361- 382. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.904840
Young, R. (2018). What is the effect of Content Language Integrated Learning on pupil motivation to learn a foreign language? Scottish Languages Review, (34), 29-38. https://scilt.org.uk/Portals/24/Library/slr/issues/34/34-03 Young.pdf
Yunus, N. M., & Sukri, S. I. A. (2017). The use of English in teaching mathematics and science: The PPSMI Policy vis-à-vis The DLP. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(1), 133-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.1p.133
Zhang, B., Qiao, M., Jin, X., & Wang, L. (2019). What are the experiences of College English Teaching in Heilongjiang Province, China? In T. D. Neimann & U. M. Stelson (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities in global approaches to education (pp. 95-114). IGI Global.
Zydatiß, W. (2012). Linguistic thresholds in the CLIL classroom? The threshold hypothesis revisited. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 17–28. http://www.icrj.eu/14/article2.html
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493