Pre-Service Teachers' Perspectives towards the Use of GammaTutor in Teaching Physical Sciences in South African Secondary Schools
Abstract
This paper reports on introducing a techno-blended model for science teaching in South African senior secondary schools. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework was used as a lens for the interpretation of pre-service science teachers' use of the GammaTutor tool in the classroom for collaboration and creativity. The study employed an interpretivist multi-case design that purposefully sampled ten pre-service science teachers. Data were collected through non-participatory classroom observation and interviews. Data were then analysed qualitatively using deductive approaches with a modified version of TPACK as an analytical framework. The study found that pre-service science teachers were enthusiastic about using the GammaTutor tool because they believed it engaged their learners in the teaching-learning process and facilitated the assessment of tasks. The pre-service teachers felt that the GammaTutor tool enhanced their instruction by expanding their access to teaching-learning resources and personalising instruction. Additionally, the pre-service teachers discussed their concerns, particularly in assisting underperforming learners and effectively utilizing inquiry-based instruction using the GammaTutor tool. Notwithstanding certain apparent drawbacks, the study contributes to our understanding of how the TPACK concept might be employed as a framework for analysis in a particular situation. More crucially, teaching and learning are founded on the thorough integration of technological tools in day-to-day classroom activities.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.18
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abboud, M., & Rogalski, J. (2017, February 1-5). Real uses of ICT in classrooms: Tensions and disturbances in mathematics teachers’ activity. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.). (2017). Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME10), Dublin, Ireland: DCU Institute of Education and ERME.
Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. (2011). ICT use in the teaching of mathematics: Implications for professional development of pre-service teachers in Ghana. Education and Information Technologies, 16(4), 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-010-9141-9
Al-Balushi, S.M., & Al-Hajri, S.H. (2014). Associating animations with concrete models to enhance students’ comprehension of different visual representations in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00074E
Anderson, J., & Barnett, M. (2011). Using video games to support pre-service elementary teachers learning of basic physics principles. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(4), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.10007/s10956-010-9257-0
Aslan, S. (2017). The effect of learning by teaching on pre-service science teachers’ attitudes towards chemistry. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10201a
Baidoo, M., Ameyaw, Y., & Annan, J. N. (2022). Efficacy of Padlet instructional tool on students’ engagement and perception in the teaching and learning of some ecological concept. International Journal of Sciences, 11(04), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.18483/ijSci.2554
Bekele, T. A. (2021). COVID-19 and prospect of online learning in higher education in Africa. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 13(5), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v13i5.4060
Bingimlas, K. A. (2017). Learning and teaching with Web 2.0 applications in Saudi K-12 schools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 16(3), 100-115.
Boateng, S.D. (2020) Exploring students’ academic achievements in electricity and magnetism through learning styles and learning style-based instructional strategies in Mthatha High Schools [Doctoral dissertation]. University of the Witwatersrand.
Chao, J., Chiu, J. L., DeJaegher, C. J., & Pan, E. A. (2016). Sensor augmented virtual labs: Using physical interactions with science simulations to promote understanding of gas behaviour. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9574-4
Chien, Y. T., Chang, C. Y., Yeh, T. K., & Chang, K. E. (2012). Engaging pre-service science teachers to act as active designers of technology integration: A MAGDAIRE framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 578-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.12.005
Coomeyras, M. (2000, February 13). Promoting a culture in reading. The Comet.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2009). Ubiquitous learning. University of Illinois Press.
Czernjewicz, L., Ravjee, N., & Mlitwa, N. (2004). Information and communication technologies (ICTs) and South African higher education: Understanding/s (of) the landscape. Growth, 3, 4.
Dalal, M., Archambault, L., & Shelton, C. (2017). Professional development for international teachers: Examining TPACK and technology integration decision making. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3-4), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1314780
Dietrich, L. (2018). Unpack TPACK in your classroom. In P. Mishra (Ed.). (2018). Revised version of TPACK image. https://punyamishra.com/2018/09/10/the-tpack-diagram-gets-an-upgrade/
Engineering News. (2020). A South African university has developed a teaching method that improves maths and science marks in SA schools. Creamer Media’s Engineering News. https://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/a-south-african-university-has-developed-a-teaching-method-that-improves-maths-and-science-marks-in-sa-schools-2020-01-20
Fernandes, G. W. R., Rodrigues, A. M., & Ferreira, C. A. (2020). Professional development and use of digital technologies by science teachers: A review of theoretical frameworks. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 673-708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9707-x
Finger, G., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Grimbeek, P. (2013, November 29-December 01). Teaching teachers for the future project: Building TPACK confidence and capabilities for e-learning. International Conference on Educational Technologies, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259010722_TEACHING_TEACHERS_FOR_THE_FUTURE_PROJECT_BUILDING_TPACK_CONFIDENCE_AND_CAPABILITIES_FOR_ELEARNING
Gershon, I. (2017). Language and the newness of media. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46, 15–31. https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041300
Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191.
Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2018). The race between education and technology. In D. Grusky & J. Hill (Eds.), Inequality in the 21st century (pp. 49-54). Routledge.
Hochberg, K., Kuhn, J., & Müller, A. (2018). Using smartphones as experimental tools—effects on interest, curiosity, and learning in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 385-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9731-7
Jarosievitz, B. (2017, March 16-17). Modern physics teaching resources and activities. Conference proceedings: New perspectives in science education (6th ed). Florence, Italy. https://www.academia.edu/32410101/Conference_Proceedings_New_Perspectives_in_Science_Education
Jerrim, J. (2018). A digital divide? Randomised evidence on the impact of computer-based assessment in PISA. CfEE Research Brief. London: Centre for Education Economics. https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/library/a-digital-divide-randomised-evidence-on-the-impact-of-computer-based-assessment-in-pisa
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE Publishing.
Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing pre-service teachers' intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59.
Joshi, D. R. (2017). Influence of ICT in mathematics teaching. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, 3(1), 7-11.
Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19.
Koopman, O., Van Wyk, M., & Koopman, K. (2020). Science teachers’ views and applications of technology-based teaching. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/cgp/v13i03/25-42.
Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. London: SAGE Publishing.
Lim, C. P., & Hang, D. (2003). An activity theory approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools. Computers & Education, 41(1), 49-63.
Luft, J. A., Dubois, S. L., Nixon, R. S., & Campbell, B. K. (2015). Supporting newly hired teachers of science: Attaining teacher professional standards. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 1-48.
Martin, B. (2018). Faculty technology beliefs and practices in teacher preparation through a TPACK lens. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 1775-1788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9680-4.
McGraw-Hill. (2019). What is TPACK theory and how can it be use in the classroom. www.mheducation.ca/blog/what-is-tpack-theory-and-how-can-it-be-used-in-the-classroom.
Mosiane, T. M. (2019, October 21-25). Tablet TouchTutor®: A 21st-century offline tool to enhance the self-directed learning of FET mathematics learners. ISTE International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Kruger National Park, Mpumalanga, South Africa https://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/26168?show=full
Ogegbo, A. A., & Ramnarain, U. (2022). Teaching and learning Physics using interactive simulation: A guided inquiry practice. South African Journal of Education, 42(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42n1a1997.
Orhun, N. (2012). The relationship between learning styles and achievement in calculus course for engineering students. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 47, 638-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.710.
Pima, J. (2019). Factors that motivate teachers to use ICT in teaching: A case of Kaliua District secondary schools in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 15(1).
Pineida, F. O. (2011). Competencies for the 21st century: Integrating ICT to life, school, and economical development. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 28, 54-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.011.
Postholm, M. B. (2007). The advantages and disadvantages of using ICT as a mediating artefact in classrooms compared to alternative tools. Teachers and teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(6), 587-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600701683531.
Ramnarain, U. & Hlatswayo, M. (2018). Teacher beliefs and attitudes about inquiry-based learning in a rural school district in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1431
Reddy, V., Prinsloo, C., Arends, F., Visser, M., Winnaar, L., Feza, N., ... & Maja, M. (2012). Highlights from TIMSS 2011: The South African perspective. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/2877
Republic of South Africa. Department of Basic Education. (2018). National Senior Certificate Diagnostic Report - Part 1. Pretoria: Government Printer. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Reports/2017%20NSC%20Diagnostic%20Report%20Part%201.pdf?ver=2018-01-30-140924-883.
Republic of South Africa. Department of Basic Education. (2019). National Senior Certificate examination report. National diagnostic report. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Printer. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/Reports.
Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2015). Creative schools: Revolutionising education from the ground up. Penguin UK.
Santos, J.M., & Castro, T.D. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100110
Shulman, L. 1986. Paradigms and research programmes in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp.3-36). Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Shulman, L. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Smith, J. J., & Greene, H. C. (2013). Pre-service teachers use e-learning technologies to enhance their learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 12(1), 121-140.
Sondlo, A., & Ramnarain, U. (2019, June 22-24). Exploring the South African Physical Sciences pre-service teachers’ pedagogical orientations. International Conference on Education and New Developments Porto, Portugal. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED604965
Sun, Y., Strobel, J., & Newby, T. J. (2017). The impact of student teaching experience on pre-service teachers’ readiness for technology integration: A mixed-methods study with growth curve modelling. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 597-629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9486-x
Sweeney, T., & Drummond, A. (2012). How prepared are our pre-service teachers to integrate technology: A pilot study. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 117-123.
Thompson A. D., & Mishra, P. (2007). Editors' remarks. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 38-64. https://doi.org.10.1080/10402454.2007.10784583
Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge. In P.L.Peterson, E.Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 656-661). Academic Press.
Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3518
Voogt, J., & McKenney, S. (2017). TPACK in teacher education: Are we preparing teachers to use technology for early literacy? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1174730
Waghid, Z., & Waghid, F. (2018). [Re] examining the role of technology in education through a deliberative decision-making approach: In the quest towards democratic education in South African schools. In African democratic citizenship education revisited (pp. 133-156). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67861-0_7
Walan, S. (2020). Embracing digital technology in science classrooms—secondary school teachers’ enacted teaching and reflections on practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09828-6
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. SAGE Publishing.
Zhang, W. X., Hsu, Y. S., Wang, C. Y., & Ho, Y. T. (2015). Exploring the impacts of cognitive and metacognitive prompting on students’ scientific inquiry practices within an e-learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 529-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.996796
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493