Exploring Learners’ Experiences of Receiving Formative Written Assessment Feedback in Business Studies as a Subject in South Africa

Preya Pillay, Raudina Balele

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to understand Grade 10 Business Studies learners’ experiences of receiving written formative assessment in the South African school context. This exploratory qualitative study employed a case study design and was conducted with 12 Grade 10 learners from two public secondary schools, located in Johannesburg East, Gauteng. The study sample was purposefully and conveniently selected and data were collected through semi- structured interviews via WhatsApp voice calls. Thematic analysis was employed to make sense of the data. Findings of the study generated two themes to describe the learners’ experiences, namely timing, and specificity of formative feedback. The learners disclosed that they received delayed feedback that did not specify their individual progress, areas of work that was well done, and areas that needed improvement. This study suggests that if classroom teachers are to become effective ‘mediators’ of formative assessment, they must be provided with a better theoretical and practical grounding in the nature of formative assessment feedback. The Department of Education needs to provide more guidelines, practical demonstrations, and workshops to assist to teachers to understand and implement formative assessment feedback practices effectively. Teacher and student feedback literacy also has the potential to facilitate principled, research-informed feedback processes in the future.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.10.12


Keywords


formative assessment; formative feedback; timing of feedback; specificity of feedback; Business Studies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aizenkot, D. (2020). A quantitative and qualitative approach to analysing cyberbullying in classmates’ WhatsApp groups. In Understanding media and society in the age of digitalisation (pp. 185–208). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38577-4_9

Attali, Y., & van der Kleij, F. (2017). Effects of feedback elaboration and feedback timing during computer-based practice in mathematics problem solving. Computers & Education, 110, 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.012

Bell, E., & Bryman, A. (2012). The ethics of management research: An exploratory content analysis. British Journal of Management, 18(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00487.x

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2),77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brookhart, S.M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students. ASCD.

Carless, D. (2012). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203128213-15

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43(8), 1315–1325. http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Chidiebere, A.C. (2020). Investigating technology integration in business education in Nigeria secondary schools: a critical analysis (Doctoral dissertation).

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Cooper, G. (1999). Being constructive: Social constructionism and the environment. Sociology, 33(2), 296-316.

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915580941

Department of Education (DoE). (2017). National Protocol for Assessment Grades R-12. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Policies/NatProtAssess

Engelsen, K., & Smith, K. (2017). Is ‘excellent’ good enough?. Education Inquiry, 1(4), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v1i4.21954

Evans, C. (2013). Making Sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350

Faulconer, E., Griffith, J., & Gruss, A. (2022). The impact of positive feedback on student outcomes and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1910140

Gibson, K. (2022). Bridging the digital divide: Reflections on using WhatsApp instant messenger interviews in youth research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(3), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1751902

Gipps, C., & Stobart, G. (2011). Alternative assessment. In International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 549–575). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_33

Gredler, M.E. (2012). Hiding in plain sight: The stages of mastery/self-regulation in Vygotsky's cultural-historical theory. Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802616259

Guba, E.G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Education Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02766777

Hansen, G. (2020). Formative assessment as a collaborative act. Teachers’ intention and students’ experience: Two sides of the same coin, or? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100904

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Heritage, M., & Wylie, E.C. (2020). Teacher preparation in Mathematics. In: Formative assessment in the disciplines: Framing a continuum of professional learning. Harvard Education Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315166933-9

Jones, H., Hoppitt, L., James, H., Prendergast, J., Rutherford, S., Yeoman, K., & Young, M. (2016). Exploring students’ initial reactions to the feedback they receive on coursework. Bioscience Education, 20(1), 3-21.

Kluger, A.N., & DeNisi, A. (2016). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

Martella, R. C., Nelson, J. R., Marchand-Martella, N. E., & O'Reilly, M. (2019). Comprehensive behavior management: Individualized, classroom, and schoolwide approaches. Sage.

Moeed, A. (2015). Theorizing formative assessment: Time for a change in thinking. The Educational Forum, 79(2), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2014.1002593

Ngwenya, J.C., & Maistry, S.M. (2012). Teaching and assessment in accounting: An exploration of teachers’ experiences in a rural KwaZulu-Natal school. Journal of Social Sciences, 33(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2012.11893083

Nicol, D. (2019). Reconceptualising feedback as an internal not an external process. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 71–84. https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/sird/article/view/3270.

Nicol, D. (2021). The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2),199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314

Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2016). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518

Peacock, S., Murray, S., & Scott, A. (2014). Using eportfolios in higher education to encourage learner reflection and support personalised learning. In Technology-supported environments for personalized learning: Methods and case studies (pp. 185-211). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-884-0.ch011

Quinn, P.G., & Nakata, T. (2017). The timing of oral corrective feedback. In Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning (pp. 35-47). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621432-4

Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2012). Designing and selecting samples. Qualitative Research Methods, 77–108.

Russell, Y. (2013). New assessment methods in business studies in the FET phase (Doctoral thesis, University of South Africa).

Sardareha, S.A., & Saad, M.R.M. (2012). A sociocultural perspective on assessment for learning: The case of a Malaysian primary school ESL context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.277

Smith, A.M. (2018). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Nurse Education in Practice, 12(3), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2011.11.008

Swart, E.K., Nielen, T.M., & Sikkema-de Jong, M.T. (2019). Supporting learning from text: A meta-analysis on the timing and content of effective feedback. Educational Research Review, 28, 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100296

Tanner, K.D. (2017). Promoting student metacognition. CBE Life Sciences Education,11, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033.

Van der Kleij, F.M. (2019). Comparison of teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment feedback practices and association with individual student characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.010

Van der Nest, A., Long, C., & Engelbrecht, J. (2018). The impact of formative assessment activities on the development of teacher agency in mathematics teachers. South African Journal of Education, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1382

Vu, J.V., Harbaugh, C.M., De Roo, A.C., Biesterveld, B.E., Gauger, P. G., Dimick, J.B., & Sandhu, G. (2020). Leadership-specific feedback practices in surgical residency: A qualitative study. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.08.020

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4.5

Woo, Y., & Reeves, T.C. (2011). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.005

Yelin, D., Wirtheim, E., Vetter, P., Kalil, A.C., Bruchfeld, J., Runold, M., Guaraldi, G., Mussini, C., Gudiol, C., Pujol, M., Bandera, A., Scudeller, L., Paul, M., & Leibovici, L. (2020). Long-term consequences of COVID-19: Research needs. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(10), 1115–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30701-5


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493