Teachers who Attract or Repel: A Glimpse at Student Expectations of their Tertiary-Level Teachers

Stephen Joseph

Abstract


This study examined student expectations of their tertiary-level teachers, highlighting specific teacher characteristics that either attract or turn off students from their professors. Four hundred and one (401) students were randomly selected from three teacher education campuses in the north and south of Trinidad as well as Tobago. Findings of the study revealed that students generally had high expectations of their teachers on two levels: (i) pedagogical competence and (ii) discipline competence. Findings also revealed that the three teacher characteristics that attract students to their professors were caring for the welfare of students; professionalism; and teaching style. Conversely, students listed unprofessionalism; teacher aggressive attitude; and lack of concern for students as things that repel them from their professors.

 

 


Keywords


student expectations; tertiary-level teachers; teacher characteristics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arnon, S. & Reichel, N. (2007). “Who is the ideal teacher? Am I? Similarities and differences in

perception of students of education regarding the qualities of a good teacher and their own qualities as teachers.†Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 13(5), 441-464. http://dx.org/10.1080/13540600701561653

Crawford, P. L., & Bradshaw, H. L. (1968). Perception of characteristics of effective university

teachers: A scaling analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28: 1079-85.

Douna, P., Kyridis, A., Zagkos, C., Ziontaki, Z., & Pandis, P. (2015). The ideal university

teacher according to the views of Greek students. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(20, 145-158.

Epting, L. K., Zinn, T. E., Buskist, C., & Buskist, W. (2004). Students perspectives on the

distinction between ideal and typical teachers. Teaching of Psychology, 31(3), 181-183.

Feldman, K. (1988). Effective college teaching from the students’ and faculty’s view:

Matched or mismatched priorities? Research in Higher Education, 28(4), 291-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BFO1006402

Fortson, S. B., & Brown, W. E. (1998). Best and worst university instructors: The opinions of

graduate students. College Student Journal, 32(4), 572-576.

Giroux, H., A. (1988). Schooling and the struggle for public life: critical pedagogy in the

modern age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press.

Gurung, R. A. R. & Vespia, K. M. (2007). Looking good, teaching well? Linking liking, looks,

and learning. Teaching of Psychology, 34, (1), 5-10.

Hande, H., Kamath, S., & D’Souza, J. (2014). Students’ perception of effective teaching

practices in a medical school. Education in Medicine Journal, 6(3), 63-66.

McLean, M. (2001), Qualities attributed to an ideal educator by medical students: Should faculty

take cognizance? Medical Teacher, 23 (4), 367-370.

http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590120057030

Obermiller, C., Ruppert, B., & Atwood, A. (2012). Instructor credibility across disciplines:

Identifying students’ differentiated expectations of instructor behaviours. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 153-165. DOI: 10.1177/1080569911434826

Roberts, D. C. (1981). Student leadership programs in higher education. Washington, DC:

American College University Press.

Slate, J., La prairie, N., Schulte, D., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2011). Views of effective college

faculty: A mixed analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(3), 331-346.

Strage, A. (2008). Traditional and non-traditional college students’ descriptions of the “idealâ€

professor and the “ideal†course and perceived strengths and limitations. College Student Journal, 42(1), 225-231.

Tam, K. Y., Heng, M., & Jiang, G. (2009). What undergraduate students in China say about their

professors’ teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(20, 147-159.

Witcher, A. E., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Minor, L. (2001). Characteristics of effective teachers:

Perceptions of preservice teachers. Research in the Schools, 8(2), 45-57.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493