Multiple Representation Approach in Elementary School Science Learning: A Systematic Literature Review

Rois Saifuddin Zuhri, Insih Wilujeng, Haryanto Haryanto

Abstract


The paper investigates the multiple representation approach as used in elementary school science learning. A systematic literature review (SLR) method and preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocol were employed in this research. This included systematic review stages, eligibility and exclusion criteria, review process procedures, and data abstraction and analysis assisted by Publish or Perish 7, VOSviewer, and NVivo 12 Plus applications. The search for publications on Scopus through the Publish or Perish 7 application yielded 605 publications, and for the ERIC database, there were 2018 publications, making 2623 publications. The publications were then filtered according to compatible themes and 50 were selected to be used as material for the SLR. The 50 publications were analyzed according to the assigned topics through the NVivo 12 Plus application, and the results are described in this paper. According to literature, multiple representations is a learning approach that involves using more than one or two representations. This is done by utilizing text, video, tables, audio, animation, diagrams, analogies, cartoons, movements, formulas, and graphs to reflect, interpret, and solve scientific problems in elementary science learning. The multiple representation approach is implemented through task assignment, visualization technology; representation of images, symbols, tables, pictures, and graphs; scientific investigations; engineering design; technological skills; applications; recordings; and written symbols. The impact that the multiple representation approach has in elementary science learning is an increase in reasoning skills, critical thinking skills, communication skills, solving of science problems, concern for nature conservation, and social and visual intelligence. This paper contributes to research examining multiple representations in elementary school science learning.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.4


Keywords


elementary school; multiple representation approach; science learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdurrahman, A., Setyaningsih, C. A., & Jalmo, T. (2019). Implementating multiple representation-based worksheet to develop critical thinking skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10271a

Abrosimova, L. (2013). Word-formation in the context of multi-disciplinary cognitive paradigm. (IJCRSEE) International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 1(1). https://www.ijcrsee.com/index.php/ijcrsee/article/view/50/551

Adams, A., Feng, Y., Liu, C. L., & Stauffer, E. (2021). Potentials of teaching, learning, and design with virtual reality: An interdisciplinary thematic analysis. In B. Hokanson, M. Exter, A. Grincewicz, M. Schmidt, & A. A. Tawfik (Eds.), Intersections across disciplines (pp. 173–186). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53875-0_14

Afriyani, D., Sa‘dijah, C., Subanji, S., & Muksar, M. (2018). Characteristics of students’ mathematical understanding in solving multiple representation task based on solo taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3920

Åhman, N., & Jeppsson, F. (2020). Teachers’ and pupils’ scientific dialogue in learning about invisible thermal phenomena. International Journal of Science Education, 42(18), 3116–3133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1852334

Ainsworth, S. (2014). The multiple representation principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 464–486). Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.024

Alkhateeb, M. (2019). Multiple representations in 8th Grade mathematics textbook and the extent to which teachers implement them. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3982

Alt?nba?, A. A., Ertekin, E., & Solak, S. (2023). A study on multiple representation and self-efficacy perception in systems of linear equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2156933

Amyar, A., Modzelewski, R., Li, H., & Ruan, S. (2020). Multi-task deep learning based CT imaging analysis for COVID-19 pneumonia: Classification and segmentation. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 126, 104037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104037

Andersen, M. F., & Munksby, N. (2018). Didactical design principles to apply when introducing student-generated digital multimodal representations in the science classroom. Designs for Learning, 10(1), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.16993/DFL.100

Aydeniz, S. (2021). The representation of multiple intelligences in the secondary school Turkish curriculum. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(2), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.260

Azaryahu, L., & Adi-Japha, E. (2020). “MusiMath”: A music-based intervention program for learning patterns and symmetry. Journal of Experimental Education, 90(2), 319?343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1799316

Bakar, K. A., Mohamed, S., Yunus, F., & Karim, A. A. (2020). Use of multiple representations in understanding addition: The case of pre-school children. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(2). https://doi.org/ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/1976

Baker, L. R., Phelan, S., Woods, N. N., Boyd, V. A., Rowland, P., & Ng, S. L. (2021). Re envisioning paradigms of education: Towards awareness, alignment, and pluralism. Advances in Health Science Educucation, 26(3), 1045–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10036-z

Bakri, F., & Muliyati, D. (2018). Design of multiple representations e-learning resources based on a contextual approach for the basic physics course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012037

Batlolona, J. R., & Souisa, H. F. (2020). Problem based learning: Students’ mental models on water conductivity concept. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(2). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20468

Benedeti?, N. (2018). Multiple representations in physics education, models and modelling in science education. CEPS Journal : Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(1), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.496

Cai, P., Li, C., Luo, G., Zhang, C., Ochege, F. U., Caluwaerts, S., De Cruz, L., de Troch, R., Top, S., Termonia, P., & de Maeyer, P. (2020). The responses of the ecosystems in the Tianshan North slope under multiple representative concentration pathway scenarios in the middle of the 21st century. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010427

Çetin, H., Mercan Erdogan, S., & Yazici, N. (2021). Predictive power of 8th Grade students’ translating among multiple representations skills on their algebraic reasoning. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(5), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.375.9

Chabanet, P., Stoica, G., Carrière, S. M., Sabinot, C., Bedrossian, C., & Ferraris, J. (2018). Impact of the use of a teaching toolbox in an awareness campaign on children's representations of coral reefs. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00340

Chang, H. Y. (2021). Science teachers’ and students’ metavisualization in scientific modeling. Science Education, 106(2), 448–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21693

Chung, C-H., Pan, H-L. W. (2023). Assessing the effects of flow, social interaction, and engagement on students’ gamified learning: A mediation analysis. Sustainability, 15(2), 983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020983

Chusni, M. M. (2022). Enhancing critical thinking skills of junior high school students through discovery-based multiple representations learning model. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 927–944. https://www.e iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2022_1_53.pdf

Conceição, T., Baptista, M., & da Ponte, J. P. (2021). Lesson study as a means to change secondary preservice physics teachers’ practice in the use of multiple representations in teaching. Education Sciences, 11(12), 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120791

Danday, B. A. (2023). Fostering critical thinking among pre-service teachers through a multiple representation-based collaborative pedagogical approach. In N. Rezaei (Ed.), Brain, decision making and mental health (pp. 191–217). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15959-6_11

Danish, J., Stiso, C., Nicholas, C., Hmelo-Silver, C., Rogers, M. P., & Francis, D. C. (2020). What, how, and why do elementary teachers think about using representations in their science teaching? Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL, 4, 1934–1941.

Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Perdana, R., Kuswanto, K. & Ikhlas, M. (2020). Do a science process skills affect on critical thinking in science? Differences in urban and rural. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(4). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20687

Dasgupta, C., Magana, A. J., & Vieira, C. (2018). Investigating the affordances of a CAD enabled learning environment for promoting integrated STEM learning. Computers and Education, 129, 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.014

Davis, B., & Dunn, R. (2023). Children’s meaning making: Listening to encounters with complex aesthetic experience. Education Sciences, 13(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010074

Eliyawati, E., Agustin, R. R., Sya’bandari, Y., & Putri, R. A. H. (2020). Smartchem: An android application for learning multiple representations of acid-base chemistry. Journal of Science Learning, 3(3), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i3.23280

Erdo?an, S. M., Çetin, H., & Ari, K. (2021). Development of multiple representation translating measurement tool and examination of 9th Grade students’ multiple representation translate skills in algebra. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 14(2), 160?180. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.14.2.12

Fatimah, S. (2017). Analisis pemahaman konsep ipa berdasarkan motivasi belajar, keterampilan proses sains, kemampuan multirepresentasi, jenis kelamin, dan latar belakang sekolah mahasiswa calon guru SD [Analysis of understanding science concepts based on learning motivation, science process skills, multirepresentation ability, gender, and school background of prospective elementary school students]. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 1(1). http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jippsd/article/view/7934

Fatmawati, A., Zubaidah, S., Sutopo, S., & Mahanal, S. (2023). The effect of learning cycle multiple representation model on biology students’ critical thinking perceived from academic ability. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569, 020022. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112430

Fatmawati, A., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Sutopo, S. (2022). Representation skills of students with different ability levels when learning using the LCMR model. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.20

Feldman, S., Bates, S., & Romano, Y. (2023). Calibrated multiple-output quantile regression with representation learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(148). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.00816

Flegr, S., Kuhn, J., & Scheiter, K. (2023). When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts: Combining real and virtual experiments in science education. Computers & Education, 197, 104745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104745

Gao, L., Xu, K., Wang, H., & Peng, Y. (2022). Multi-representation knowledge distillation for audio classification. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80, 5089–5112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11610-8

Gebre, E. (2018). Learning with multiple representations: Infographics as cognitive tools for authentic learning in science literacy. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 44(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27572

Gillies, R. M., & Baffour, B. (2017). The effects of teacher-introduced multimodal representations and discourse on students’ task engagement and scientific language during cooperative, inquiry-based science. Instructional Science, 45, 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11251-017-9414-4

Gillies, R. M., Nichols, K., & Khan, A. (2015). The effects of scientific representations on primary students’ development of scientific discourse and conceptual understandings during cooperative contemporary inquiry-science. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(4), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.988681

Guan, T., Wang, J., Lan, S., Chandra, R., Wu, Z., Davis, L., & Manocha, D. (2022). M3DETR: Multi-representation, multi-scale, mutual-relation 3D object detection with transformers [Conference session]. IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) (pp. 772–782). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.11896

Han, S., Ren, F., Du, Q., & Gui, D. (2020). Extracting representative images of tourist attractions from Flickr by combining an improved cluster method and multiple deep learning models. International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020081

Hansen, J., & Richland, L. E. (2020). Teaching and learning science through multiple representations: Intuitions and executive functions. CBE Life Sciences Education, 19(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0253

Hasbullah, H., Halim, A., & Yusrizal, Y. (2019). Penerapan pendekatan multi representasi terhadap pemahaman konsep gerak lurus [Application of a multi-representational approach to the understanding of the concept of straight motion]. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA. https://dx.doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v2i2.11621

Helbach, J., Hoffmann, F., Pieper, D., & Allers,K. (2023). Reporting according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for abstracts (PRISMA-A) depends on abstract length. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 154, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.12.019

Herawati, H., Hakim, A., & Nurhadi, M. (2020). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning with multiple representation to improve critical thinking skill in learning electrochemistry. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215, 020007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0001060

Hsu, H. P., Wenting, Z., & Hughes, J. E. (2018). Developing elementary students’ digital literacy through augmented reality creation: Insights from a longitudinal analysis of questionnaires, interviews, and projects. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118794515

Huang, Y., & Bo, D. (2023). Emotion classification and achievement of students in distance learning based on the knowledge state model. Sustainability, 15(3), 2367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032367

Hubber, P. (2017). Representation construction approach: A guided inquiry pedagogy for science [Conference session]. 1st UR International Conference on Educational Sciences. https://ices.prosiding.unri.ac.id/index.php/ICES/article/view/4795

Hubber, P., & Preston, C. (2021). Teaching electricity to Year 6 primary students using representational pedagogies: From simple circuits to complex ideas. In D. Geelan, K. Nichols, & C. V. McDonalds (Eds.), Complexity and simplicity in science education (pp. 193–211). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79084-4_11

Hubber, P., & Tytler, R. (2017). Enacting a representation construction approach to teaching and learning astronomy. In D. Treagust, R. Duit, & H. Fischer (Eds.), Multiple representations in physics education (pp. 139–161). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_7

Ibda, H., Febriani, N. R., Al Hakim, M. F., Faizah, S. N., Wijanarko, A. G., & Qosim, N. (2022). Game innovation: A case study using the Kizzugemu visual novel game with Tyranobuilder software in elementary school. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (IJEECS), 28(1), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v28.i1.pp460-469

Ibda, H., Syamsi, I., & Rukiyati, R. (2023). Professional elementary teachers in the digital era: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23565

Ibda, H., Wulandari, T. S., Abdillah, A., Hastuti, A. P., & Mahsum, M. (2023). Student academic stress during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS), 12(1), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijphs.v12i1.21983

Kang, H., Xia, L., Yan, F., Wan, Z., Shi, F., Yuan, H., Jiang, H., Wu, D., Sui, H., Zhang, C., & Shen, D. (2020). Diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 representation learning. IEEE Transactions On Medical Imaging, XX(XX), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2020.2992546

Kara, F., & Incikabi, L. (2018). Sixth Grade students’ skills of using multiple representations in addition and subtraction operations in fractions. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018438137

Kartikasari, A., Roemintoyo, R., & Yamtinah, S. (2018). The effectiveness of science textbook based on science technology society for elementary school level. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 7(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7i2.13022

Khaizaar, N. I., & Hidayat, R. (2022). The implementation of dual language programme for mathematics education in secondary schools: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.669

Ktoridou, D., Epaminonda, E., & Karayiannis, A. (2018). Multidisciplinary group case-based learning environment: An education paradigm to cultivate entrepreneurial thinking. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, collaboration, and innovation in the modern business era (pp. 262–277). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5014-3.ch013

Kurnaz, M. A., & Bayri, N. G. (2018). The analysis of secondary school students’ transition situations in multiple representations. Science Education International, 29(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v29.i1.1

Kusmaryono, I., & Maharani, D. W. H. R. (2022). Number of response options, reliability, validity, and potential bias in the use of the Likert scale education and social science research: A literature review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.625

Kusumaningsih, W., Darhim, D., Herman, T., & Turmudi, T. (2018). Improvement algebraic thinking ability using multiple representation strategy on realistic mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5404.281-290

Lee, O., & Shin, M. (2021). Universal design for learning in adapted national-level digital mathematics textbooks for elementary school students with disabilities. Exceptionality, 31(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2021.1938062

Lombardo, T. (2014). Multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches to futures education. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(4), 121–134. https://jfsdigital.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/144-S05.pdf

Mai, S., Sun, Y., Zeng, & Hu, H. (2023). Excavating multimodal correlation for representation learning. Information Fusion, 91, 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.11.003

Masmali, A., & Alghamdi, F. (2021). Factors influencing teachers’ continuation of online learning in elementary schools. International Education Studies, 14(12), 31. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n12p31

Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2019). The teaching factory network: A new collaborative paradigm for manufacturing education. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.062

Mohamed, R., Ghazali, M., & Samsudin, M. A. (2021). A systematic review on teaching fraction for understanding through representation on Web of Science database using PRISMA. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 9(1), 100–125. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1327588.pdf

Mohd Rashid, S. M., & Wong, M. T. (2023). Challenges of implementing the individualized education plan (IEP) for special needs children with learning disabilities: Systematic literature review (SLR). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.1.2

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & PRISMA-P Group (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 1(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., & Goedhart, M. (2021). The use of multiple representations in undergraduate physics education: What do we know and where do we go from here? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577

Nche, O. M., Colbert-Busch, E., Sitaraman, M., & Zordan, V. B. (2019). Presenting CS concepts through multiple representations to engage African-American elementary school children. CoNECD 2019 – Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity. https://people.computing.clemson.edu/~vbz/papers/nche_2019_PCS.pdf

Ngin, C. S. (2018). Examining a teacher’s use of multiple representations in the teaching of percentages: A commognitive perspective [Research group paper]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA) (pp. 591–598), Auckland, New Zwealand. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED592449

Nielsen, W., Turney, A., Georgiou, H., & Jones, P. (2022). Meaning making with multiple representations: A case study of a preservice teacher creating a digital explanation. Research in Science Education, 52, 871–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10038-2

Nizhenkovska, I. V., Reva, T. D., Chkhalo, O. M., But, I. O., & Manchenko, O. V. (2022). Best practices for teaching chemistry disciplines to graduates majoring in pharmacy during the COVID-19 restrictions: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.769

Nunes Bica, M. S., & Roehrs, R. (2021). Discussing science teaching assessment for students the elementary school in science teaching: A pedagogical didactic strategy based on multiple representations and the neuroscience. Investigacoes Em Ensino de Ciencias, 26(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2021v26n1p27

Nur, A. S., Kartono, K., Zaenuri, Z., & Rochmad, R. (2022). The learning trajectory construction of elementary school students in solving integer word problems. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.22.9.1

Nurrahmawati, N., Sa’dijah, C., Sudirman, S., & Muksar, M. (2021). Assessing students’ errors in mathematical translation: From symbolic to verbal and graphic representations. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20819

Olsson, A. E., Maleševi?, N., Björkman, A., & Antfolk, C. (2021). Learning regularized representations of categorically labelled surface EMG enables simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 18(35), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00832-4

Opfermann, M., Schmeck, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). Multiple representations in physics and science education: Why should we use them? In D. Treagust, R. Duit, & H. Fischer (Eds.), Multiple representations in physics education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_1

Pantidos, P., Kaliampos, G., & Ravanis, K. (2021). Narration and multimodality: The role of the human body and material objects in science teaching. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22074

Pebriana, I. N., Supahar, S., Pradana, P. W., & Mundilarto, M. (2022). Investigating multiple representations ability of high school students on linear motion. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2021), 640, 232–237. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220129.042

Permatasari, B. D., Gunarhadi, G., & Riyadi, R. (2019). The influence of problem based learning towards social science learning outcomes viewed from learning interest. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(1). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i1.15594

Priyanto, D., & Dharin, A. (2021). Students creativity development model and its implementation in Indonesian Islamic elementary school. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 11(3), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2021.00

Rachmaningtyas, N. A., Kartowagiran, B., Sugiman, Retnawati, H., & Hassan, A. (2022). Habituation of mathematical literacy trained in junior high school. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(2), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.2.321

Rahman, N. A., Rosli, R., Rambely, A. S., & Halim, L. (2021). Mathematics teachers’ practices of STEM education: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1541–1559. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1541

Rashid, A. H. A., Shukor, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Na, K. S. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions and readiness toward the implementation of virtual learning environment. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.21014

Sankey, M. D., Birch, D., & Gardiner, M. W. (2011). The impact of multiple representations of content using multimedia on learning outcomes across learning styles and modal preferences. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 7(3), 18?35. http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//viewarticle.php?id=1255

Santhanasamy, C., & Yunus, M. M. (2022). A systematic review of flipped learning approach in improving speaking skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.127

Scherb, C. A., & Nitz, S. (2020). Attitudes of biology teachers towards learner-generated external visual representations. Research in Science Education, 50, 2533–2558. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-018-9792-X

Schlecht, W. D., van Wie, B. J., Golter, P. B., Richards, R. F., Adam, J. C., Kranov, A. A., Compere, M., Maurer, E., Davis, D., Adesope, O. O., Law, J., Brown, G., Dutta, P., Thiessen, D., & Abdul, B. (2011). Multi-disciplinary project-based paradigm that uses hands-on desktop learning modules and modern learning pedagogies [Research paper]. 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--18979

Semilarski, H., & Laius, A. (2021). Exploring biological literacy: A systematic literature review of biological literacy. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1181?1197. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1181

Sermanet, P., & Hsu, J. (2018). Time-contrastive networks : Self-supervised learning from video [Conference session]. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 1134–1141). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.06888

Sibgatullin, I. R., Korzhuev, A. V., Khairullina, E. R., Sadykova, A. R., Baturina, R. V., & Chauzova, V. (2022). A systematic review on algebraic thinking in education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11486

Singleton, L., Davishahl, E., & Haskell, T. (2020). Getting your hands dirty in integral calculus [Conference session]. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, June 22–26, 2020. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34707

Sunyono, S., & Meristin, A. (2018). The effect of multiple representation-based learning (MRL) to increase students’ understanding of chemical bonding concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.16219

Suryandari, K. C., Rokhmaniyah, & Wahyudi. (2021). The effect of scientific reading based project model in empowering creative thinking skills of preservice teacher in elementary school. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1199–1213. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1329

Susilaningsih, E., Drastisianti, A., Lastri, Kusumo, E., & Alighiri, D. (2019). The analysis of concept mastery using redox teaching materials with multiple representation and contextual teaching learning approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 475–481. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i4.18072

Taher, M., Hamidah, I., & Suwarma, I. R. (2017). Profile of students’ mental model change on law concepts Archimedes as impact of multi-representation approach. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012101

Tanti, Maison, Syefrinando, B., Daryanto, M., & Salma, H. (2020). Students’ cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies towards hands-on science. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(4). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20657

Tippett, C. D. (2016). What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 725–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1158435

Tytler, R., Mulligan, J., Prain, V., White, P., Xu, L., Kirk, M., Nielsen, C., & Speldewinde, C. (2021). An interdisciplinary approach to primary school mathematics and science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1926–1949. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1946727

Vogt, A., Klepsch, M., Baetge, I., & Seufert, T. (2020). Learning from multiple representations: Prior knowledge moderates the beneficial effects of signals and abstract graphics. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.601125

Watts, F. M., Park, G. Y., Petterson, M. N., & Shultz, G. V. (2022). Considering alternative reaction mechanisms: Students’ use of multiple representations to reason about mechanisms for a writing-to-learn assignment. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(2), 486–507. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/RP/D1RP00301A

Wilson, R. E., & Bradbury, L. U. (2021). Assessing early primary students’ growth in a science unit using multiple modes of representation: Investigating the promise of explicit drawing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 43(8), 1341–1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1909774

Wu, S. P. W., Corr, J., & Rau, M. A. (2019). How instructors frame students’ interactions with educational technologies can enhance or reduce learning with multiple representations. Computers and Education, 128, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.012

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

Xu, L., Prain, V., & Speldewinde, C. (2021). Challenges in designing and assessing student interdisciplinary learning of optics using a representation construction approach. International Journal of Science Education, 43(6), 844–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1889070

Yusuf, N. B. (2020). Colleges of education students’ awareness of use of multiple representations in explaining chemistry concepts in Kwara State, Nigeria. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 13(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.13.1.2

Zhao, B-W., Hu, L., You, Z-H., Wang, L., & Su, X-R. (2022). HINGRL: predicting drug–disease associations with graph representation learning on heterogeneous information networks. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab515

Zheng, T., Ge, H., Li, J., & Wang, L. (2020). Unsupervised multi-view representation learning with proximity guided representation and generalized canonical correlation analysis. Applied Intelligence, 51(1), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01821-1


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493