Principals’ Leadership Orientation and Students’ Academic Performance in Secondary Schools of Gedeo Zone, Ethiopia

RJ (Nico) Botha, Seyoum Gari Aleme

Abstract


As accountability in educational leadership has increased, interest in finding the most rewarding type of principal leadership orientation that helps to improve student performance is enhanced. The lack of agreement on the most rewarding type of leadership orientation among task-focused, relationship-focused or/and change-focused behaviours, as well as the incidence of poor performance by students has resulted in the Gedeo Zone of Ethiopia commissioning us to conduct this study. The objective of the study was to identify the most profitable type of principal leadership orientation that enhances the success of students in the secondary schools of the zone. Three ineffective (least achievers) and three effective (best achiever) schools of the zone were chosen purposively, as sample for the study by using the maximum variation strategy. The total of the sample was 339, of which 321 (n=321) participated in the quantitative part of the study, while 18 were involved in the qualitative part. A questionnaire, semi-structured interviews and document analysis were used as instruments to collect the data. The quantitative data were analysed by using means, standard deviations, correlations, regressions, and line graphs, while the qualitative data were analysed via a content-analytical approach. The findings of this study revealed that high task and change-oriented behaviours among school leadership enhanced the students’ success, while high relationship-oriented behaviours intended to get a mere affiliation affected the learners’ success negatively. High task-oriented behaviours enable principals to initiate work, directing members towards goals, and monitoring members’ performance. The active engagement of principals in teaching and learning activities enhances students’ academic ‘achievements more than mere passive involvement to deal with the challenges they may encounter. Thus, principals are advised to exhibit high task and high change-oriented behaviours, as their engagement affects other stakeholders to play their role in improving students’ learning.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.7.2


Keywords


leadership; task-oriented; relationship-oriented; change-oriented; Ethiopian secondary schools; students’ performance; Gedeo zone

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviours and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quarterly, 15 (1), 5–32.

Armstrong, M. (2009). Handbook of Management and Leadership: A guide to managing for results. 2nd ed. London and Philadelphia, KOGAN PAGE. ISBN 978-0-7494-5417-3

Bass, B. M. (1990). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.

Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1998). Testing the combined effects of newcomer information seeking and manager behavior on socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 72–83.

Brady, L. (2012). Principal Evaluation: A Description of current practice. San Diego state University.

Budohi, L. A. (2014). The Effect of Principals’ Leadership Styles on the Academic Achievement of Students in Public Secondary Schools in Lurambi Division, Kakamega County, Kenya. . KCA University. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1427.8807

Botha, R. J. (2012). “Exploring Practices Determining School Effectiveness in South African Schools.” International Journal of Educational Studies 4 (2): 137– 145

Choi A., & Gil M. (2017). Does school leadership affect student academic achievement? What Works in Education? Using evidence to improve education. Institut Catala d’Avaluacio de Politiques Publiques

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. (6th ed.) London and New York: Routhledge. Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cruickshank, V. (2017). The Influence of School Leadership on Student Outcomes. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 115-123.

Day, C., Gu, Q. & Sammons, P. (2016) The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: How Successful School Leaders Use Transformational and Instructional Strategies to Make a Difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 221-258.

Ekvall, G., & Arvonen, J. (1991). Change-centred leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 7, 17–26.

Garland, J. E. (2018). "The Relationship between Principal Leadership Behaviour and Student Achievement in Low Performing Schools". Seton Hall University Dissertations and Thesis. (ETDs). 2511.

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95–110.

Johnson, R. B, & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational Research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. (5TH ed). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Kim, H., & Yukl, G. (1995). Relationships of self-reported and subordinate-reported leadership behaviours to managerial effectiveness and advancement. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 361–377.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27-42.

Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., &Anderson, S. E. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. St. Paul: University of Minnesota.

Mullins, L, J. (2005). Management and Organisational Behaviour. (7th ed.). Prentice Hall. http://www.booksites.net/mullins

Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership. Theory and Practice. Western Michigan University: SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pty.

Northouse, P.G (2016). Leadership. Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishers.

Onorato, M. (2013). Transformational leadership style in the educational sector: an empirical study of corporate managers and educational leaders. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, Volume 17, Number 1, 2013 organizing schools (pp. 157?179). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Pinto, D. A. (2014). Effective principal leadership behaviour: the student perspective. electronic theses, projects, and dissertations. paper 11

Sithole, S. L., Higson-Smith, C., & Bless, C. (2013). Fundamentals of social research methods: An African perspective. Lusaka: Juta and Company Ltd.

Tesfaye D., & Ayalew T. (2020). The Effects of Leadership Style on Students Performance. Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 Vol.11, No.34

Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). University at Albany State. University of New York. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493