Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Self-Efficacy in Military Cadets

Ole Boe, Hans-Olav Bergstøl

Abstract


Within the military profession the will to succeed and to strive for results that go beyond what is expected, is the difference between success and failure. The demands of war can be extreme and a crucial factor for the will to succeed is the education of and training on self-efficacy. Self-efficacy can be obtained either through theory or through practice. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether officer cadets at the Norwegian Military Academy felt that there was a correlation between theory and practice when it came to Bandura’s four factors of how to increase self-efficacy. The four factors were enactive mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion, and physiological and mental states. Method: A self-developed questionnaire with 14 questions was used in order to investigate the research question. 10 questions related to theoretical and practical aspects of self-efficacy was developed. The last question was intended to find out which of the four factors that had the largest impact upon self-efficacy, and respondents were forced to choose one of the four factors. 50 officer cadets at the Norwegian Military Academy participated in the study. Results: A correlation between Bandura’s theory and the practice was found. The factors enactive mastery experiences and vicarious experience were found to have a high correlation between theory and practice. The highest correlation between theory and practice was found for the factor verbal persuasion. The lowest correlation between theory and practice was found for the factor physiological and mental states. However, when forced to choose which factor that in total had the largest impact upon self-efficacy, a clear majority of respondents indicated the factor enactive mastery experiences.


Keywords


self-efficacy; military officers; theory; practice; education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Doss, W. (2007). Condition to win: Dynamic techniques for performance oriented mental conditioning. New York: Looseleaf Law Publications, Inc.

Eid, J., & Johnsen, B. H. (2006). Operativ psykologi (Operational Psychology) (2nd ed). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.

Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Prospects and limits of the empirical study of expertise: An introduction. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Towards a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 1-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Forsvaret. (2012). FSJ grunnsyn på ledelse i Forsvaret (The Norwegian Armed Forces Chief of Defence basic view of leadership in the Armed Forces). Norwegian Armed Forces Defence Staff: Oslo.

Forsvarets Stabsskole (2007). Forsvarets fellesoperative doktrine (Norwegian Armed Forces Joint Operational Doctrine). Norwegian Armed Forces Defence Staff: Oslo.

Forsvarets Stabsskole (2014). Forsvarets fellesoperative doktrine (Norwegian Armed Forces Joint Operational Doctrine). Norwegian Armed Forces Defence Staff: Oslo.

Jacobsen, D. I. (2005). Hvordan gjennomføre undersøkelser? Innføring i samfunnsvitenskapelig metode (How to conduct investigations? Introduction to social science methodology) (2nd ed). Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget.

Janelle, C. M., & Hillmann, C. H. (2003). Expert performance in sport: Current perspectives and critical issues. I K. A. Ericsson & J. Starkes (Eds.), Recent advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 19-48). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Jex, S. M., Bliese, P. D., Buzzell, S., & Primeau, J. (2001). The impact of self-efficacy on stressor-strain relations: Coping style as an exploratory mechanism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 401-409.

Johannessen, A., Tufte, P. A., & Christoffersen, L. (2010). Introduksjon til samfunnsvitenskapelig metode (Introduction to social science methodology) (4th ed). Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.

Johannessen, J-A., & Olsen, B. (2008). Positivt lederskap: Jakten på de positive kreftene (Positive leadership: Hunting the positive forces). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

Kaufmann, G., & Kaufmann, A. (1998), Psykologi i organisasjon og ledelse (Psychology in organization and leadership) (2nd ed), Bergen: Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad & Bjørke AS.

Krigsskolen. (2009). Lederutvikling i hæren: Krigsskolens program for lederutvikling. Emneplan for ledelsesfaget ved Krigsskolen (Leadership development in the Norwegian Army: the Norwegian Military Academy´s program for leadership development. Subject plan for leadership subject at the Norwegian Military Academy). Oslo: Krigsskolen.

Krigsskolen (2010). Studiehåndbok Krigsskolen 2010-2011 Bachelor i militære studier, ledelse, og landmakt, treårig utdanning (Study handbook for the Norwegian Military Academy 2010-2011 Bachelor in military studies, leadership, and land power three-year program). Oslo: Krigsskolen.

Kvarv, S. (2010). Vitenskapsteori: Tradisjoner, posisjoner og diskusjoner (Theory of Science: Traditions, positions and discussions). Oslo: Novus forlag.

Matthews M. D. (2014). Head strong: How Psychology is Revolutionizing War. Oxford University Press: New York, USA.

U.S. Department of the Army. (2015). FM 6-22. US Army Field Manual 6-22. Army Leadership. Washington, USA: Department of Army.

Williams, A. M., & Ericsson, K. A. (2005). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: Some considerations when applying the expert performance approach. Human Movement Science, 24(3), 283-307.

Wormnes, B., & Manger, T. (2005). Motivasjon og mestring: Veier til effektiv bruk av egne ressurser (Motivation and coping: Methods to make efficient use of your own resources). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493