Effects of Facilitating Condition, Social Influence and Self-Efficacy on Science Teachers’ Integration of Digital Technology in South Africa: A Regression-Based Approach

Samuel Jere, Mamotena Mpeta

Abstract


The ongoing failure to raise academic achievement in certain science subjects across rural areas of South Africa necessitates the consideration of technology-enhanced instructional approaches, as such strategies can augment learners’ understanding. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the integration of digital technologies in teaching sciences in a rural district of South Africa. The study was guided by the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology as the theoretical framework. A cross-sectional survey was used to collect quantitative data. The research instrument was a questionnaire related to science teachers’ integration of digital technology. The sample size was 158 participants, who were selected using convenience sampling. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and stepwise multiple linear regression. The study found that science teachers’ integration of digital technology was moderate. Stepwise multiple linear regression revealed that facilitating condition (? = 0.446, t = 6.088, p < .05) was the most important predictor of teachers’ integration of digital technology, followed by self-efficacy (? = 0.295, t = 4.857, p < .05) and social influence (? = 0.160, t = 2.213, p < .05). The study offers insights to policymakers and educators on improving the integration of digital technology in science education. Suggestions for accelerating the integration of digital technology in economically disadvantaged rural communities are presented. The implications of the study are that improving facilitating conditions, self-efficacy, and social influence can enhance science teachers’ integration of digital technology. Future research is required to determine changes over time in the teachers’ integration of digital technology through longitudinal studies.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.4.19


Keywords


Digital technology; Facilitating condition; Self-efficacy; Science; Social influence; Rural communities

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317

AlAli, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). How ChatGPT will shape the teaching learning landscape in future? Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(2), 336-345. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0047

Alneyadi, S., & Wardat, Y. (2024). Integrating ChatGPT in grade 12 quantum theory education: An exploratory study at Emirate school (UAE). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(3), 398-410. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.3.2061

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122

Bawaneh, A. K., & Moumene, A. B. H. (2020). Flipping the classroom for optimizing undergraduate students' motivation and understanding of medical physics concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(11), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8561

Buraimoh, O. F., Boor, C. H., & Aladesusi, G. A. (2023). Examining facilitating condition and social influence as determinants of secondary school teachers’ behavioural intention to use mobile technologies for instruction. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 3(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijert.v3i1.44720

Cabellos, B., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2024). The moderating role of school facilitating conditions and attitudes towards ICT on teachers' ICT use and emphasis on developing students’ digital skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 107994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107994

Chávez, H. D., Cladellas P. R., & Castelló T. A. (2023). Habit and social influence as determinants of PowerPoint use in higher education: A study from a technology acceptance approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 497-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799021

Department of Basic Education. (2019). Professional development framework for digital learning. Department of basic education. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Publications/Digital%20Learning%20Framework.pdf?ver=2018-07-09-101748-953

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02299597

Fernandes, G. W. R., Rodrigues, A. M., & Ferreira, C. A. (2020). Professional development and use of digital technologies by science teachers: A review of theoretical frameworks. Research in Science Education, 50, 673-708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9707-x

Fernández-Sánchez, M. R., Garrido-Arroyo, M. C., & Porras-Masero, I. (2022). Curricular integration of digital technologies in teaching processes. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1005499

Flatt, C., & Jacobs, R. L. (2019). Principle assumptions of regression analysis: Testing, techniques, and statistical reporting of imperfect data sets. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(4), 484-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422319869915

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Mayorga-Fernández, M. J., Bravo-Agapito, J., & Escribano-Ortiz, D. (2021). Analysis of teachers’ pedagogical digital competence: Identification of factors predicting their acquisition. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26, 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09432-7

Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., & Hadisaputra, P. (2020). Science teachers’ integration of digital resources in education: A survey in rural areas of one Indonesian province. Heliyon, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04631

Hand, B., Chen, Y. C., & Suh, J. K. (2021). Does a knowledge generation approach to learning benefit students? A systematic review of research on the science writing heuristic approach. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 535-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09550-0

Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Publications. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=-P-BzgEACAAJ

Hennessy, S., Wishart, J., Whitelock, D., Deaney, R., Brawn, R., La Velle, L., McFarlane, A., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching. Computers & Education, 48(1), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.02.004

Hidayat, R., & Wardat, Y. (2023). A systematic review of augmented reality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12157-x

Ifinedo, E., & Kankaanranta, M. (2021). Understanding the influence of context in technology integration from teacher educators’ perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2020.1867231

Ifliadi, I., Prasetyo, I., Mendrofa, L. I., & Hendrawati, E. S. (2024). Utilization of digital-based learning media in the independent curriculum in elementary schools. Proceedings of International Conference on Education, 140-149. https://jurnal.serambimekkah.ac.id/index.php/ice/article/view/1348/1016

Inkinen, J., Klager, C., Juuti, K., Schneider, B., Salmela?Aro, K., Krajcik, J., & Lavonen, J. (2020). High school students' situational engagement associated with scientific practices in designed science learning situations. Science Education, 104(4), 667-692. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21570

Jere, S., & Mpeta, M. (2024). Evaluation of Pre-service Teachers’ Digital Competence in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Ebangi Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 21(1), 314-325. https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2024.2101.27

Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005

Kundu, A., Bej, T., & Dey, K. N. (2021). Investigating effects of self-efficacy and infrastructure on teachers' ICT use, an extension of UTAUT. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 16(6), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.20211101.oa10

Kwon, K., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sari, A. R., Khlaif, Z., Zhu, M., Nadir, H., & Gok, F. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy matters: Exploring the integration of mobile computing device in middle schools. TechTrends, 63, 682-692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00402-5

Leem, J., & Sung, E. (2019). Teachers' beliefs and technology acceptance concerning smart mobile devices for SMART education in South Korea. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 601-613. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12612

Leow, L. P., Phua, L. K., & Teh, S. Y. (2021). Extending the social influence factor: Behavioural intention to increase the usage of information and communication technology-enhanced student-centered teaching methods. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1853-1879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10017-4

Liu, R., Wang, L., Koszalka, T. A., & Wan, K. (2022). Effects of immersive virtual reality classrooms on students' academic achievement, motivation and cognitive load in science lessons. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1422-1433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12688

Lomos, C., Luyten, J., & Tieck, S. (2023). Implementing ICT in classroom practice: What else matters besides the ICT infrastructure? Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 11(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00144-6

Lucas, M., Bem-Haja, P., Siddiq, F., Moreira, A., & Redecker, C. (2021). The relation between in-service teachers' digital competence and personal and contextual factors: What matters most? Computers & Education, 160, 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104052

Makki, T. W., O'Neal, L. J., Cotten, S. R., & Rikard, R. (2018). When first-order barriers are high: A comparison of second-and third-order barriers to classroom computing integration. Computers & Education, 120, 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.005

Mannila, L., Nordén, L. Å., & Pears, A. (2018). Digital competence, teacher self-efficacy and training needs. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 78-85. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3230993

Manz, E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2020). Rethinking the classroom science investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1148-1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21625

Mwapwele, S. D., Marais, M., Dlamini, S., & Van Biljon, J. (2019). Teachers' ICT adoption in South African rural schools: A study of technology readiness and implications for the South Africa connect broadband policy. The African Journal of Information and Communication, 24, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/28658

Olugbade, D., Oyelere, S. S., & Agbo, F. J. (2024). Enhancing junior secondary students' learning outcomes in basic science and technology through PhET: A study in Nigeria. Education and Information Technologies, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12391-3

Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Barlow, A. T., & Smith-Walters, C. (2020). Student motivation from and resistance to active learning rooted in essential science practices. Research in Science Education, 50, 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1

Parliament of the Republic of South Africa. (2016). Analysis of Basic Education's Report on the Provision of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and e-Education with a Focus on Connectivity. Parliament of the Republic of South Africa Research Unit. https://static.pmg.org.za/160301analysis.pdf

Pearman, C., Bowles, F., & Polka, W. (2021). Teacher educator perceptions of characteristics of self-efficacy. Critical Questions in Education, 12(1), 81-99. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1287249.pdf

Peng, R., Abdul Razak, R., & Hajar Halili, S. (2023). Factors influencing in-service teachers’ technology integration model: Innovative strategies for educational technology. PloS One, 18(8), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286112

Phillips, M. (2015). Digital technology integration. In H. Henderson (Ed.), Teaching and Digital Technologies: Big Issues and Critical Questions, 318-331. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316091968.031

Pimentel, J. L., & Pimentel, J. (2019). Some biases in Likert scaling usage and its correction. International Journal of Science: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 45(1), 183-191. https://core.ac.uk/outputs/249336645?source=oai

Rehmat, A. P., & Bailey, J. M. (2014). Technology integration in a science classroom: Preservice teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 744-755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9507-7

Rubach, C., & Lazarides, R. (2021). Addressing 21st-century digital skills in schools–Development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers' basic ICT competence beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106636

Sharma, S., & Saini, J. R. (2022). On the role of teachers’ acceptance, continuance intention and self-efficacy in the use of digital technologies in teaching practices. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(6), 721-736. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1998395

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Teo, T. (2010). Examining the influence of subjective norm and facilitating conditions on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9066-4

Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008

Teo, T., Ursava?, Ö. F., & Bahçekapili, E. (2012). An assessment of pre-service teachers' technology acceptance in Turkey: A structural equation modeling approach. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(1), 191-202. https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/An-assessment-of-pre-service-teachers-technology/991005544964207891

Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2

Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Fernández-Sánchez, M. R., Revuelta Dominguez, F. I., & Sosa-Díaz, M. J. (2021). The educational integration of digital technologies preCovid-19: Lessons for teacher education. PloS One, 16(8), e0256283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256283

Vannatta, R., & Banister, S. (2009). Validating a measure of teacher technology integration. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. https://works.bepress.com/savilla_banister/5/

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65-S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012

Wang, Z., & Chu, Z. (2023). Examination of higher education teachers’ self-perception of digital competence, self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions: An empirical study in the context of China. Sustainability, 15(14), 10945. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410945

Wong, K. T., Muhammad, M., & Abdullah, N. (2020). Exploring the drivers of intention to use interactive whiteboards among Malaysia university students: Does technology self-efficacy matter? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(1), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i01.11497

Xue, S., Du, J., & Yang, Y. (2023). Institutional influences on teachers’ classroom technology integration: A multi-case study of teachers’ uses of mobile social media at universities in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(4), 1306-1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1996332


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493