Dual Perspectives: How English Lecturers Perceive Peer and Supervisor Observations
Abstract
This study aimed to elicit working English language lecturers’ perceptions of their peer and supervisor observations. Since a new researchers-made questionnaire was developed for this study, the reliability of the survey was measured through a pilot study with 20 lecturers before distributing the final version. Two Applied Linguists specialists worked on the statements to ensure validity. A comprehensive perception questionnaire was used and answered by 40 English language teachers from the Preparatory Studies Center. Moreover, all 21 items in a 5-point Likert scale in the questionnaire were analyzed individually to ensure the homogeneity of statements based on the reliability index through factor analysis. The results showed a high reliability index equal to Cronbach’s alpha 0.995. In addition, the study’s findings revealed that lecturers preferred peer observation more than supervisor observation, as it fosters professional development, increases the functionality of instructional techniques, and reduces observation anxiety. However, the results also showed that the supervisor’s observation process was more precise and transparent. The findings of this study are helpful for teachers, supervisors and organizations. For teachers, the preference for peer observation suggests that it can be an effective tool for professional development, enhancing instructional techniques, and reducing anxiety associated with evaluations. For supervisors, the study underscores the importance of maintaining clarity and transparency in the observation process, which can build trust and improve the overall effectiveness of evaluations. For organizations, these insights can inform the design and implementation of observation and evaluation systems, balancing the benefits of both peer and supervisor observations to create a more supportive and constructive environment for professional growth.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.7.6
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmed, E., Nordin, Z. S., Shah, S. R., & Channa, M. A. (2018). Peer observation: A professional learning tool for English language teachers in an EFL institute. World Journal of Education, 8(2), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n2p73
Atkinson, D. J., & Bolt, S. J. (2010). Using teaching observations to reflect upon and improve teaching practice in higher education. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1-19.
Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. Higher Education, 55(6), 735-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9093-1
Bell, M. (2001). Supported reflective practice: A programme of peer observation and feedback for academic teaching development. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440110033643
Bell, M. (2005). Peer observation partnerships in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
Blackmore, J. A. (2005). A critical evaluation of peer review via teaching observation within higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(3), 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540510591002
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720967
Danielson, C. (2010). Evaluations that help teachers learn. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 35-39.
Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Educational Testing Service.
Devos, N. J. (2014). A framework for classroom observations in English as a foreign language (EFL) teacher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(2), 17-28.
Donnelly, R. (2007). Perceived impact of peer observation of teaching in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 117-129.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2007). Failing the practicum: Narrowing the gap between expectations and reality with reflective practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00049.x
Farrell, T. S. C. (2011). ‘Keeping SCORE’: Reflective practice through classroom observations. RELC Journal, 42(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688211419396
Ficke, S. B. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of the observation, coaching, and feedback cycle (Publication No. 322) [Doctoral dissertation, University of New England]. DUNE: DigitalUNE. https://dune.une.edu/theses/322
Fletcher, J. A. (2018). Peer observation of teaching: A practical tool in higher education. Journal of Faculty Development, 32(1), 51-64.
Gosling, D. (2005). Peer observation of teaching. Staff and Educational Development Association.
Granström, M., Kikas, E., & Eisenschmidt, E. (2023). Classroom observations: How do teachers teach learning strategies? Frontiers in Education, 8, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1119519
Halim, S., Wahid, R., & Halim, T. (2018). Classroom observation: A powerful tool for continuous professional development (CPD). IJLRES - International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies, 2(2), 162-168. https://doi.org/10.30575/2017/IJLRES-2018050801
Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2004). Evaluating our peers: Is peer observation a meaningful process? Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000236380
Harris, B. M. (1986). Developmental teacher evaluation. Allyn & Bacon.
Harris, K-L., Farrell, K., Bell, M., Devlin, M., & James, R. (2008). Peer Review of Teaching in Australian Higher Education: A handbook to support institutions in developing and embedding effective policies and practices. Retrieved from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/pdfs/PeerReviewHandbook_eVersion.pdf.
Jogan, S. N. (2018). Classroom observation as an important tool for initial trainee teachers. International Journal of Current Research, 10(11), 75808-75811.
Karagiorgi, Y. (2012). Peer observation of teaching: perceptions and experiences of teachers in a primary school in Cyprus. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 16(4), 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2012.717210
Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2015). Teaching learning strategies: The role of instructional context and teacher beliefs. Journal of Educational Research Online, 7, 176-197. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:11052
MacDonald, S. (2016). Theory and practice of classroom observation. Retrieved from https://cfde.emory.edu/_includes/documents/sections/teaching/classroom-observation.pdf
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum.
MacKinnon, M. M. (2001). Using observational feedback to promote academic development. The International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440110033689
Mann, S. (2005). The language teacher’s development. Language Teaching, 38(3), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444805002867
Marshall, B. (2004). Learning from the academy: From peer observation of teaching to peer enhancement of learning and teaching. The Journal of Adult Theological Education, 1(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1558/jate.1.2.185.65573
Martin, G. A., & Double, J. M. (1998). Developing higher education teaching skills through peer observation and collaborative reflection. Innovations in Education & Training International, 35(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800980350210
Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://doi.org/10.1353/book50506
Motallebzadeh, K., Hosseinnia, M., & Domskey, G. H. J. (2017). Peer observation: A key factor to improve Iranian EFL teachers’ professional development. Cogent Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1277456
Muijs, D. (2006). Measuring teacher effectiveness: Some methodological reflections. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500392236
Peel, D. (2005). Peer observation as a transformatory tool? Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510500239125
Putman, H., Ross, E., & Walsh, K. (2018). Making a difference: Six places where teacher evaluation systems are getting results. National Council on Teacher Quality.
Quinlan, K. M. (2002). Inside the peer review process: How academics review a colleague’s teaching portfolio. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 1035-1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(02)00058-6
Quinlan, K. M., & Åkerlind, G. S. (2000). Factors affecting departmental peer collaboration for faculty development: Two cases in context. Higher Education, 40, 23-52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004096306094
Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667237
Sachs, J., & Parsell, M. (2014). Peer review of learning and teaching in higher education: International perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7639-5
Santos, L. M. D. (2016). Foreign language teachers’ professional development through peer observation programme. English Language Teaching, 9(10), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n10p39
Sheal, P. (1989). Classroom observation: Training the observers. ELT Journal, 43(2), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/43.2.92
Shortland, S. (2010). Feedback within peer observation: Continuing professional development and unexpected consequences. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.498181
Smith, M. K., Jones, F., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. Life Sciences Education, 12, 618-627. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154
Spada, N. (2019). Classroom observation research. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning (Part II, Chapter 8). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.009
Stronge, J. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2003). Teacher evaluation: Assessing and improving performance. Eye on Education.
Strong, M., Gargani, J., & Hacifazlioglu, Ö. (2011). Do we know a successful teacher when we see one? Experiments in the identification of effective teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 367-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110390221
Todd, M. A. (2017). Peer observation as a tool for professional development. Culminating Projects in English, 84. Retrieved from https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/engl_etds/84
Tosriadi, Abdul Asib, Sri Marmanto, & Umu Arifatul Azizah. (2018). Peer observation as a means to develop teachers’ professionalism. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(3), 151-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i3.140
Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2017). The role of feedback from the school leader during teacher evaluation for teacher and school improvement. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 6-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203770
Wairimu, M. J. (2016). Teachers’ perception on classroom observation and checking of pupils’ exercise books by head teachers on performance of duty in primary schools in Nakuru North District, Kenya. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 3(3), 80-87.
Watende, D. N. (2007). A study of teachers’ perception on supervisory duties of primary school head teachers in Ol’kalou Division in Nyandarua District. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(2), 156-172.
Whittaker, E., Pathak, A., Piya, S., Cary, L., & Harden, J. (2023). Peer observation of student-led teaching. Medical Teacher, 45(11), 1300-1303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2229506
Wong, H. (2004). the first days of school: How to be an effective teacher. Harry Wong Publications.
Wragg, T. (2002). An introduction to classroom observation (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203018958
Yiend, J., Weller, S., & Kinchin, I. (2014). Peer observation of teaching: The interaction between peer review and developmental models of practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(4), 465-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2012.726967
Zaare, M. (2013). An investigation into the effect of classroom observation on teaching methodology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 605-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.099
Zepeda, C., Hlutkowsky, C., Partika, A., & Nokes-Malach, T. (2018). Identifying teachers’ supports of metacognition through classroom talk and its relation to growth in conceptual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 522–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000300
Zimmerman, S., & Deckert-Pelton, M. (2003). Evaluating the evaluators: Teachers’ perceptions of the principal’s role in professional evaluation. NASSP Bulletin, 87(636), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650308763604
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493