Teaching Pedagogies Using ICT in University Academic English Writing Across the Globe—A Systematic Literature Review

Liang Yingbao, Hanita Hanim Ismail, Melor Yunus

Abstract


Mastery of academic English writing is crucial for success in higher education and can significantly enhance career prospects. With the increasing integration of information and communication technology (ICT) into teaching pedagogies across various fields, ITC’s potential to foster effective instruction and create dynamic learning environments has become evident. However, research on ICT-integrated pedagogies in academic English writing remains limited. This study addressed this gap by conducting a systematic literature review to explore the impact of ICT- integrated pedagogies on academic English writing instruction. Adhering to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, the systematic literature review process involved the identification, screening, and inclusion of studies from three major databases: Web of Science, Education Resource Information Center, and Scopus. A total of nine relevant articles, published between 2020 and 2024, available in open access, and written in English, were analyzed. The findings identified 11 common ICT-enhanced teaching pedagogies and eight frequently used ICT tools in academic English writing instruction. These pedagogies were found to enhance cognitive expression, optimize teaching effectiveness, and create engaging learning environments. The challenges faced by both instructors and students were also noted. The insights from this study offer valuable implications for academic English writing educators seeking to integrate ICT into their teaching practices.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.3.31


Keywords


Academic English writing; information and communication technology; teaching pedagogies; writing instruction; systematic literature review

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aladwan, F., Fakhouri, H. N., Alawamrah, A., & Rababah, O. (2018). Students attitudes toward blended learning among students of the University of Jordan. Modern Applied Science, 12(12), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v12n12p217

AlMarwani, M. (2020). Academic writing: Challenges and potential solutions. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.8

Al-Maroof, R. S., Alshurideh, M. T., Salloum, S. A., AlHamad, A. Q. M., & Gaber, T. (2021). Acceptance of Google Meet during the spread of Coronavirus by Arab university students. Informatics, 8(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8020024

Al-Zubaidi, K. O. (2012). The academic writing of Arab postgraduate students: Discussing the main language issues. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.246

Amirjalili, F., Neysani, M., & Nikbakht, A. (2024). Exploring the boundaries of authorship: A comparative analysis of AI-generated text and human academic writing in English literature. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1347421. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1347421

Aubry, J. (2013). Facebook-Induced Motivation Shifts in a French Online Course. TechTrends, 57(6), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0705-6

Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386.https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019

Benzie, H. J., & Harper, R. (2020). Developing student writing in higher education: Digital third-party products in distributed learning environments. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(5), 633–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1590327

Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376.https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018

Bowman, N. D., & Akcaoglu, M. (2014). “I see smart people!”: Using Facebook to supplement cognitive and affective learning in the university mass lecture. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.003

Chong, S. W. (2019). College students’ perception of e-feedback: A grounded theory perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 1090–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1572067

Cohen, J. D., Renken, M., & Calandra, B. (2017). Urban Middle School Students, Twenty-First Century Skills, and STEM-ICT Careers: Selected Findings from a Front-End Analysis. TechTrends, 61(4), 380–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0170-8

Coleman, J., Hultgren, K., Li, W., Tsui, C. C., & Shaw, P. (2018). Forum on English?medium Instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 701–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.469

Cunningham, K. J. (2019). Student perceptions and use of technology-mediated text and screencast feedback in ESL writing. Computers and Composition, 52, 222–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.02.003

Daher, W. (2014). Students’ Adoption of Social Networks as Environments for Learning and Teaching: The Case of the Facebook. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i8.3722

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385389

Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2023). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003004943

Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2021). English medium instruction and the English language practitioner. ELT Journal, 75(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa063

Genlott, A. A., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). Closing the gaps–Improving literacy and mathematics by ICT-enhanced collaboration. Computers & Education, 99, 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.004

Ghavifekr, S., Razak, A. Z. A., Ghani, M. F. A., Ran, N. Y., Meixi, Y., & Tengyue, Z. (2014). ICT integration in education: Incorporation for teaching & learning improvement. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 24–45. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086419.pdf

Goh, D., & Kale, U. (2016). The urban–rural gap: Project-based learning with Web 2.0 among West Virginian teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(3), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1051490

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2017). Intelligent tutors as teachers’ aides: Exploring teacher needs for real-time analytics in blended classrooms. Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027451

Jara, R. (2021). Pedagogical strategies with technology in the teaching of university academic writing: A systematic review. Revista Digital de Investigación En Docencia Universitaria, 15(1), e1209. https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2021.12.1209

Jeyaraj, J. J. (2020). Academic Writing Needs of Postgraduate Research Students in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.32890/MJLI2020.17.2.1

Killingback, C., Ahmed, O., & Williams, J. (2019). ‘It was all in your voice’-Tertiary student perceptions of alternative feedback modes (audio, video, podcast, and screencast): A qualitative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 72, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.012

Kobayashi, M., Zappa-Hollman, S., & Duff, P. A. (2017). Academic discourse socialization. Language Socialization, 8, 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0_18

Koralage, T., Choi, J., & Cross, R. (2023). Leveraging L2 academic writing: Digital translanguaging in higher education. TESOL in Context, 31(2), 95–113.https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2023vol31no2art1739

Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350

Marina, I., Nadezhda, A., & Natalya, M. (2022). Digital support for teaching punctuation in academic writing in English. Journal of Language and Education, 8(3), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.13608

Martínez Lirola, M. (2022). Approaching the Use of Facebook to Improve Academic Writing and to Acquire Social Competences in English in Higher Education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11482

Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll See You On “Facebook”: The Effects of Computer-Mediated Teacher Self-Disclosure on Student Motivation, Affective Learning, and Classroom Climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520601009710

McKenzie, J. E., & Brennan, S. E. (2017). Overviews of systematic reviews: Great promise, greater challenge. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0582-8

Miller, R. E. (2020). College students and inappropriate social media posting: Is it a question of personality or the influence of friends? Personality and Individual Differences, 158, 109857.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109857

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014

Ondrusek, A. L. (2012). What the research reveals about graduate students’ writing skills: A literature review. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 176–188. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23249110

Page, M. J., Altman, D. G., Shamseer, L., McKenzie, J. E., Ahmadzai, N., Wolfe, D., Yazdi, F., Catala-Lopez, F., Tricco, A. C., & Moher, D. (2018). Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 94, 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.017

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pitura, J. (2022). Technology-enhanced socialisation into disciplinary writing in L2: Insights from the perceptions of MA TEFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2361–2390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1880440

Qub’a, A. A., Guba, M. N. A., & Fareh, S. (2024). Exploring the use of Grammarly in assessing English academic writing. Heliyon, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34893

Rafik-Galea, S., Arumugam, N., & de Mello, G. (2012). Enhancing ESL Students Academic Writing Skills through the Term-Paper. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 20(4). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/153820533.pdf

Ramalingam, S., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2022). Blended learning strategies for sustainable English as a second language education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(13), 8051. http://pertanika2.upm.edu.my/pjssh/browse/regular-issue?article=JSSH-0691-2012

Reeves, J. L., Gunter, G. A., & Lacey, C. (2017). Mobile learning in pre-kindergarten: Using student feedback to inform practice. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 37–44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.20.1.37

Russell, D. R., & Cortes, V. (2012). Academic and scientific texts: The same or different communities? In M. Castelló, & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 1–17). https://doi.org/10.1163/9781780523873_002

Sahlin, J. S., Tsertsidis, A., & Islam, M. S. (2017). Usages and impacts of the integration of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in elementary classrooms: Case study of Swedish municipality schools. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(5), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1170045

Salonen, A., Hartikainen-Ahia, A., Hense, J., Scheersoi, A., & Keinonen, T. (2017). Secondary school students’ perceptions of working life skills in science-related careers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1339–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1330575

Sarré, C., Grosbois, M., & Brudermann, C. (2021). Fostering accuracy in L2 writing: Impact of different types of corrective feedback in an experimental blended learning EFL course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 707–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1635164

Shih, R.-C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.934

Shraim, K. Y. (2014). Pedagogical innovation within Facebook: A case study in tertiary education in Palestine. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 9(8), 25. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i8.3805

Siddiq, F., Gochyyev, P., & Wilson, M. (2017). Learning in Digital Networks–ICT literacy: A novel assessment of students’ 21st century skills. Computers & Education, 109, 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.014

Skinner, E., Pitzer, J., & Brule, H. (2014). The role of emotion in engagement, coping, and the development of motivational resilience. In International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 331–347). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203148211

Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies. Computers & Education, 131, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005

Tauber, R. T. (1985). ERIC: Its introduction and usefulness. Journal of Education for Teaching, 11(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747850110301

Van De Oudeweetering, K., & Voogt, J. (2018). Teachers’ conceptualization and enactment of twenty?first century competences: Exploring dimensions for new curricula. The Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1369136

Walter, L., & Stouck, J. (2020). Writing the literature review: Graduate student experiences. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.1.8295

Wayant, C., Page, M. J., & Vassar, M. (2019). Evaluation of reproducible research practices in oncology systematic reviews with meta-analyses referenced by national comprehensive cancer network guidelines. JAMA Oncology, 5(11), 1550–1555. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2564

Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. (2005). Origin, direction and impact of emotions in social online learning. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 449–464.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.009

Xue, S., Yang, Y., Du, J., & Liu, F. (2023). Multi-layered e-feedback anxiety: An action research study among Chinese learners using peer feedback activities in an academic writing course. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1062517. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1062517

Zotzmann, K., & Sheldrake, R. (2021). Postgraduate students’ beliefs about and confidence for academic writing in the field of applied linguistics. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 100810.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100810


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493