Systematic Quality Development: A Demand at Odds with the Everyday Complexity of Teachers’ Work?

Ulrika Jepson Wigg, Anna Ehrlin

Abstract


This article aims to analyse the conditions experienced by teachers and other school staff members in their work with systematic quality development within the everyday complexity of work at school. The method consists of research circles, a form of researcher-led discussion, together with teachers, principals and other school staff, held at the schools. The research circles are part of a research- and development programme concerning newly arrived pupils, in collaboration with an institute and a municipality in Sweden. The focus of the research circles is to identify areas in need of development, make tacit knowledge visible and promote knowledge development. During the course of the programme, a number of obstacles to development work arose, which led us to an analysis of the recurring problems and demands of systematic quality development. The analysis points to the different rhythms of fast-paced everyday work on the one hand, and slow-paced development work on the other. In conclusion, we emphasise the need for time for reflection, organisational structures that support development, and finally the need to develop competence in reflective practices regarding development, an addition to the competence in reflective practice on teaching, in which the staff are already skilled. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.11.12


Keywords


Reflective practice; the reflective practitioner; school development; research-and development; elementary school

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahnberg, E., Lundgren, M., Messing, J., & von Schantz Lundgren, I. (2010). Följeforskning som

a. företeelse och följeforskarrollen som konkret praktik.[Ongoing evaluationand research as a phenomenon and the role of the ongoing evaluation researcher as a concrete practice]. Arbetsmarknad & Arbetsliv, 16(3), 55–66.

Attard, K. (2017). Personally driven professional development: Reflective self-study as a way for teachers to take control of their own professional development. Teacher Development, 21(1), 40–56. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1218363

Attard, K. (2008). Uncertainty for the reflective practitioner: A blessing in disguise. Reflective Practice, 9(3), 307–317. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802207188

Attard, K.,& Armour, K. M. (2005). Learning to become a learning professional: Reflections on one year of teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 195–207. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760500093321

Brookfield, S. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. New York: Heath & Co. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000

Goodson, I., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives. London: Falmer Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203453988

Holmstrand, L., & Härnsten, G. (2003). Förutsättningar för forskningscirklar i skolan. En kritisk granskning. [Conditions for research circles in school: A critical evaluation]. Stockholm: Myndigheten för skolutveckling.

Hunzicker, J. (2010). Characteristics of effective professional development: A checklist. Online Submission. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2010.523955

Kruger,C. G., Van Rensburg, O.J., & De Witt, M.W. (2016). Meeting teacher expectations in a DL professional development programme: A case study for sustained applied competence as programme outcome. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,17(4), 50–65. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2458

Lahdenperä, P. (ed.) (2011). Forskningscirkel – arena för verksamhetsutveckling i mångfald. [Research circles – an arena for developing work in diversity]. Studies in Social Sciences 2011:1, Mälardalens högskola.

Lahdenperä, P. (ed). (2014). Forskningscirkel – mötesplats för samproduktion. [Research circles: Meeting points for collaborative research].Mälardalen Studies in Educational Sciences, 14, Mälardalens högskola.

Leitch, R.,& Day, C.(2000). Action research and reflective practice: Towards a holistic view. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 179–193. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790000200108

Meierdirk, C. (2016). Is reflective practice an essential component of becoming a professional teacher? Reflective Practice, 17(3), 369–378. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2016.1169169

Molander, B. (2000). Kunskap i handling. [Knowledge in action].Göteborg: Daidalos.

Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., van der Steen, J., & Nijveldt, M. (2014). A study of the quality of practitioner research in secondary education: impact on teacher and school development. Educational Action Research, 22(1), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.854175

Otterup, T., Wahlström, A. M., & Andersson, S. (2013). Forskningscirkeln–en arena för kunskapsutveckling och förändringsarbete. [Theresearch circle:An arena for knowledge development and change]. Rosa 18. Institutet för svenska som andraspråk, Göteborgs universitet.

Persson, S. (2008). Forskningscirklar–en vägledning. [Research circles:A guide].Resurscentrum för mångfaldens skola: Malmö stad.

Schön, D. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473

See, B.H., Gorard, S., & Siddiqui, N. (2016). Teachers’ use of research evidence in practice: A pilot study of feedback to enhance learning. Educational Research, 58(1), 56–72. DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2015.1117798. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1117798

Swedish Education Act (SFS 2010:800). Stockholm: The Ministry of Education and Research.

Swedish National Agency of Education. (2011). Curriculum for compulsory school. Lgr 11. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency of Education.

Swedish Schools Inspectorate (2017). Årsrapport 2017. Strategier för kvalitet och helhet i utbildningen. [Annual report 2017: Strategies for quality and unity in education]. Stockholm: Swedish Schools Inspectorate.

Wabule, A. (2016). Continuous professional development: What role and who benefits? Reflections on teacher development in Uganda. Africa Education Review,13(3–4),141–156. DOI: 10.1080/18146627.2016.1229575. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1229575


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493