How Do Students’ Mindsets in Learning Reflect their Cultural Values and Predict Academic Achievement?

Junfeng Zhang, Elina Kuusisto, Kirsi Tirri

Abstract


Inspired by previous research indicating implicit beliefs about the malleability of human qualities, namely mindset, to affect learning outcomes, this article compares how Chinese and Finnish students’ mindsets and attributions for success reflect their cultural values and predict their academic achievement. The study was conducted in one Chinese (N=705) and two Finnish (N=495) middle schools utilizing Dweck’s mindset inventory, Weiner’s attribution scale and students’ school marks. The results illustrated that both Chinese and Finnish students held a growth mindset, and all identified the nature of intelligence as being more malleable than giftedness. However, Chinese students did not differentiate between intelligence and giftedness as clearly as Finnish students. Both students attributed the cause of their academic achievements to effort and ability, but placed more emphasis on effort. Furthermore, Chinese students’ preference for effort significantly accounted for higher language marks, whereas Finnish students with fixed mindsets about giftedness achieved higher mathematics marks. Cultural interpretation, implications and limitations of the results were discussed.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.5.8


Keywords


Mindset; intelligence; giftedness; attribution; academic achievement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American College students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113-125. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1491

Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x

Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-Sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701. doi:10.1037/a0029531

Campbell, J. R. (1996). Developing cross-national instruments: Using cross-national methods and procedures. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(7), 675–684. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(97)86727-4

Chen, Z. C. (2014). SPSS ä¸Žç»Ÿè®¡åˆ†æž [SPSS and statistic analysis]. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.

Claro, S., Paunesku, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(31), 8664–68. doi:10.1073/pnas.1608207113

Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43–59. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007

Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York: Psychology Press.

Dweck, C. S. (2009). Self-theories and lessons for giftedness: A reflective conversation. In T. Balchin, B. Hymer, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), the Routledge International Companion to Gifted Education (pp. 308–316). London, UK: Routledge.

Dweck, C. S. (2017). Mindset: Changing the Way You Think to Fulfil Your Potential. London: Hachette UK.

Dweck, C. S., Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2014). Academic tenacity: mindsets and skills that promote long-term learning. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Feng, A. X., Campbell, J. R., & Verna, M. A. (2001). The talent development of American physics Olympians. Gifted and Talented International, 16(2), 108-114. doi: 10.1080/15332276.2001.11672972

Finnish National Board of Education. (2016). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Helsinki: National Board of Education.

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. London: Hachette UK.

Gholami, K., Kuusisto, E., & Tirri, K. (2015). Is ethical sensitivity in teaching culturally bound? comparing Finnish and Iranian teachers’ ethical sensitivity. Compare, 45(6), 886–907. doi:10.1080/03057925.2014.984588

Heller, K., & Lengfelder, A. (2000). German Olympiad study on mathematics, physics and chemistry. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, USA.

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hong, Y. Y., Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C.Y., Lin, D. M.S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: a meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 588–99. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588

Kärkkäinen, R., & Räty, H. (2010). Parents’ and teachers’ views of the child’s academic potential. Educational Studies, 36(2), 229–232. doi:10.1080/03055690903162424

Kujala, T., & Näätänen, R. (2010). The adaptive brain: a neurophysiological perspective. Progress in Neurobiology, 91(1), 55-67. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.01.006

Kuusisto, E., Laine, S. & Tirri, K. (2017). How do school children and adolescents perceive the nature of talent development? A case study from Finland. Education Research International 2017, 1–8. doi:10.1155/2017/4162957

Leondari, A., & Gialamas, V. (2002). Implicit theories, goal orientations, and perceived competence: impact on students’ achievement behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 39(3), 279–91. doi:10.1002/pits.10035

Ma, X., Jong, C., & Yuan, J. (2013). Exploring reasons for the East Asian success in PISA. Chap. 10 in H. D. Meyer, & A. Benavot (Eds.), the PISA, Power, and Policy: The Emergence of Global Educational Governance, (pp. 225–246). Oxford: Symposium Books.

Makel, M. C., Snyder, K. E., Thomas C., Malone, P. S., & Putallaz, M. (2015). Gifted students’ implicit beliefs about intelligence and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 203–12. doi:10.1177/0016986215599057

Ministry of Education and Culture & Finnish National Agency for Education. (2017). Finnish Education in a Nutshell. Accessed on 01 January 2018. http://www.oph.fi/download/146428_Finnish_Education_in_a_Nutshell.pdf

Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33

National Centre for Education Development Research & Chinese National Commission for UNESCO. (2008). National Report on Mid-Term Assessment of Education for All in China. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0020/002070/207018e.pdf

Qian, Mu. (2002). 论语新解 [New interpretation of lunyu]. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing company.

Räty, H., & Snellman, L. (1998). Social representations of educability. Social Psychology of Education, 1(4), 359–73. doi:10.1007/BF02335554

Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., Hanhimäki, E., & Tirri, K. (2016). Teachers’ implicit meaning systems and their implications for pedagogical thinking and practice: A case study from Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1-14. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2016.1258667

Tirri, K. (2001). Finland Olympiad studies: what factors contribute to the development of academic talent in Finland. Educating Able Children, 5(2), 56-66.

Tirri, K., & Kuusisto, E. (2013). How Finland serves gifted and talented pupils. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(1), 84–96. doi:10.1177/0162353212468066

Wang, Q., & Ng, F. F. Y. (2012). Chinese students’ implicit theories of intelligence and school performance: implications for their approach to schoolwork. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(8), 930–35. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.024

Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 3–25. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3

Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–73. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548

Wu, W. T., & Chen, J. D. (2001). A follow-up study of Taiwan physics and chemistry Olympians: The role of environmental influences in talent development. Gifted and Talented International, 16(1), 16-26. doi:10.1080/15332276.2001.11672949

Zhang, J. F., Kuusisto, E., & Tirri, K. (2017). How teachers’ and students’ mindsets in learning have been studied: research findings on mindset and academic achievement. Psychology, 8(9), 1363–77. doi:10.4236/psych.2017.89089


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493