Influence of Demotivators on Acceptance of Technology: Challenges of Expatriate School Teachers while Imparting Online Teaching

Gokuladas V. K., Baby Sam S. K.

Abstract


In the wake of the Covid-19 outbreak, academicians are resorting to technology-enabled remote learning to impart education.  The main objective of this study is to identify those factors that could potentially demotivate educators at primary and secondary levels of education during the remote teaching process.   This study will also look at the impact of these demotivators on the perception of educators regarding the technology-acceptance of E-learning and attitude towards E-learning. Data collected from 1174 school educators with respect to various challenges in E-learning and their acceptance of technology as an alternative mode of teaching have been analyzed through correlation and regression analysis.  This study identified major Extrinsic and Intrinsic Demotivators that affect the performance of school educators while imparting education through remote teaching.   The results showed that Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use played a mediating role in the relationship between Extrinsic & Intrinsic Demotivators and the Attitude towards E-learning.  The outcome of this study is of greater relevance to the School Management Committees and the School Administration to appropriately strategize their plans to implement E-learning as an alternative mode of education in schools.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.9


Keywords


Acceptance of Technology; Demotivators; E-learning; School Educators

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Retrieved from https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10011527857/

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade Level: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. Babson College, 231 Forest Street, Babson Park, MA 02457. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572778.pdf

Alsofyani, M. M., Aris, B. B., Eynon, R., & Majid, N. A. (2012). A preliminary evaluation of short blended online training workshop for TPACK development using the technology acceptance model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(3), 20-32.

Bacow, L., Bowen, W., Guthrie, K., Lack, K., & Long, M. (2015). Barriers to Adoption of Online Learning Systems in U.S. Higher Education. doi:10.18665/sr.22432

Banas, J. R., & York, C. S. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ Motivation to use technology and the impact of Authentic learning exercises. In L. Tomei (Ed.), Exploring the New Era of technology-infused Education (pp.121–140). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1709-2.ch008

Barin, M., Turgay, H. A. N., & Şahin, S. A. R. I. (2018). Factors affecting teacher motivation and demotivational-reasoning in a second service area school in Turkey: A single-case research. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 14(4), 226-242. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/650778

Barton, R., & Haydn, T. (2006). Trainee teachers’ views on what helps them to use information and communication technology effectively in their subject teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 257–272. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00175.x

Boekaerts, M. (2001). Motivation, Learning, and Instruction. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 10112–10117. doi:10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/02432-3.

Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103–116. doi:10.1080/01587910902845949.

Burton-Jones, A., & Hubona, G. S. (2005). Individual differences and usage behavior. ACM SIGMIS Database, 36(2), 58–77. doi:10.1145/1066149.1066155

ChanLin, L. J. (2005). Development of a Questionnaire for Determining the Factors in Technology Integration among Teachers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(4), 287-292. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/98822/

Chapman, T. K. (2011). A critical race theory analysis of past and present institutional processes and policies in teacher education. In A. F. Ball & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Studying diversity in teacher education, 237-256. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.

Cook, R. G., Ley, K., Crawford, C., & Warner, A. (2009). Motivators and Inhibitors for University Faculty in Distance and e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 149–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00845.x

Cortina, J. M. (1993). Interaction, Nonlinearity, and Multicollinearity: implications for Multiple Regression. Journal of Management, 19(4), 915–922. doi:10.1177/014920639301900411

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. doi:10.2307/249008

Demetriadis, S., Barbas, A., Molohides, A., Palaigeorgiou, G., Psillos, D., Vlahavas, I., & Pombortsis, A. (2003). “Cultures in negotiationâ€: teachers’ acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of technology into schools. Computers & Education, 41(1), 19–37. doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(03)00012-5

Ehlers, U.-D., & Hilera, J. R. (2011). Special Issue on quality in e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 1–3. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00448.x

Erkaya, O. R. (2012). Factors that motivate Turkish EFL teachers. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(1). doi:10.5861/ijrsll.2012.135

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning, Computer & Education, 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008.

Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322

Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and Motivation in Second-Language Learning. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.

Ghenghesh, P. (2013). Job Satisfaction and Motivation - What Makes Teachers Tick? British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 3(4), 456–466. doi:10.9734/bjesbs/2013/5156

Glanz, J. (2014). Action research: An educational leader's guide to school improvement. Rowman & Littlefield.

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Retrieved from http://www.click4it.org/images/a/a8/Graham.pdf

Green, T., Alejandro, J., & Brown, A. H. (2009). The Retention of Experienced Faculty in Online Distance Education Programs: Understanding Factors that Impact their Involvement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.683

Hadad, W. (2007). ICT-in-education toolkit reference handbook. InfoDev. Retrieved from http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.301.html (accessed on 29 Dec 2019)

Hancock, S., & Wong, T. (2012). Blended Learning. Retrieved from http://sites.wiki.ubc.ca/etec510/Blended_Learning#cite_note-3 (accessed on 10 Sep 2019)

Han, J., & Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation: Definition, research development, and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 3(1). doi:10.1080/2331186x.2016.1217819

Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (2017). Perspective. The Motivation to Work, 120–139. doi:10.4324/9781315124827-15

Hettiarachchi, S. (2013). English Language Teacher Motivation in Sri Lankan Public Schools. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(1). doi:10.4304/jltr.4.1.1-11

Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: implications of a teacher preparation program. Teacher Development, 11(2), 149–173. doi:10.1080/13664530701414779

Johnson, D. T. (2000). Teaching mathematics to gifted students in a mixed-ability classroom. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Retrieved from http://jukebox.esc13.net/estar34/estar34_d1_gifted_article.pdf

Kim, S. (2006). Public service motivation and organizational citizenship behavior in Korea. International Journal of Manpower, 27(8), 722–740. doi:10.1108/01437720610713521

King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003

Lackey, K. (2011). Faculty development: An analysis of current and effective training strategies for preparing faculty to teach online. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(4), 8- 17. Retrieved from https://ols.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Faculty-Development-An-Analysis-of-Current-and-Effective-Training-Strategies-for-Preparing-Faculty-to-Teach-Online.pdf

Lee, J. (2001). Instructional support for distance education and faculty motivation, commitment, satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 153–160. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00186

Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12. doi:10.17705/1cais.01250

Lloyd, S. A., Byrne, M. M., & McCoy, T. S. (2012). Faculty-perceived barriers to online education. Journal of online learning and teaching, 8(1). Available at https://jolt.merlot.org/vol8no1/abstracts.htm

Ma, W. W., Andersson, R., & Streith, K.-O. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 387–395. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00145.x

Menyhárt A. (2008). Teachers or lecturers? The motivational profile of university teachers of English. Working Papers in Language Pedagogy, 2, 119â€137. Retrieved from http://langped.elte.hu/WoPaLParticles/W2Menyhart.pdf

McQuiggan, C. A. (2012). Faculty Development for Online Teaching as a Catalyst for Change. Online Learning, 16(2). doi:10.24059/olj.v16i2.258

Oye.N.D, Salleh, M., & Noorminshah. (2011). Knowledge Sharing in the Workplace: Motivators and Demotivators. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 3(4), 71–84. doi:10.5121/ijmit.2011.3406

Panda, S., & Mishra, S. (2007). Eâ€Learning in a Mega Open University: Faculty attitude, barriers, and motivators. Educational Media International, 44(4), 323–338. doi:10.1080/09523980701680854

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68

Sansone N., Cesareni, D., Bortolotti, I., & Buglass, S. (2019). Teaching technology-mediated collaborative learning for trainee teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(3), 381-394. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2019.1623070.

Sansone, N., Cesareni, D., Ligorio, M. B., Bortolotti, I., & Buglass, S.L., (2019). Developing knowledge work skills in a university course, Research Papers in Education, 35(1), 23-42.

doi:10.1080/02671522.2019.1677754

Schechter, E. L. (2000). Factors relating to classroom implementation of computer technology in elementary schools (pp. 1-128). St. John's University (New York), School of Education and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/123270/

Seaman, J. (2009). Online Learning as a Strategic Asset. Volume II: The Paradox of Faculty Voices--Views and Experiences with Online Learning. Results of a National Faculty Survey, Part of the Online Education Benchmarking Study Conducted by the APLU-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning. Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED517311.pdf

Shea, P. (2019). Bridges and Barriers to Teaching Online College Courses: A Study of Experienced Online Faculty in Thirty- Six Colleges. Online Learning, 11(2). doi:10.24059/olj.v11i2.1728

Teddy So, K. K., & Swatman, P. (2010). The Diminishing Influence of Age and Gender on the e-Learning Readiness of Teachers in Hong Kong. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 477–488. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_43

Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers’ computer attitudes: Applying and extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 128-143. Doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00247.x

Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Wong, S. L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education, 53(3), 1000–1009. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017

Thatcher, J. B., Liu, Y., & Stepina, L. P. (2002). The role of the work itself. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research - SIGCPR ’02. doi:10.1145/512360.512365

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1964-35027-000

Ward, M. E., Peters, G., & Shelley, K. (2010). Student and faculty perceptions of the quality of online learning experiences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 57. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.867

Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty Perceptions about Teaching Online: Exploring the Literature Using the Technology Acceptance Model as an Organizing Framework. Online Learning, 21(1). doi:10.24059/olj.v21i1.761

Wong, K. T., Osman, R., Goh, P. S. C., & Rahmat, M. K., (2013). Understanding Student Teachers' Behavioural Intention to Use Technology: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Validation and Testing. Online Submission, 6(1), 89-104. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539841.pdf


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493