Constructivist Learning Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Investigating Students’ Perceptions of Biology Self-Learning Modules

Aaron A. Funa, Frederick T. Talaue

Abstract


Modes of teaching and learning have had to rapidly shift amid the COVID-19 pandemic. As an emergency response, students from Philippine public schools were provided learning modules based on a minimized list of essential learning competencies in Biology. Using a cross-sectional survey method, we investigated students’ perceptions of the Biology self-learning modules (BSLM) that were designed in print and digitized formats according to a constructivist learning approach. Senior high school STEM students from grades 11 (n = 117) and 12 (n = 104) participated in a survey using a 3-point Likert-scale questionnaire uploaded online through Google Forms. The survey results indicate that majority of the students perceived the modules positively, suggesting that aspects of the modules that were salient to students corresponded to essential elements of constructivist pedagogies. However, during interviews, students reported several difficulties in learning with BSLM as it was constrained by, to name a few, the use of unfamiliar words, lack of access to supporting resources, slow internet connection, and time constraints. To address these problems, teachers reported that they gave deadline extensions, complemented modules with other channels of support, and used online and offline platforms for reaching out to students to answer their queries and plan out their schedule for the week. The findings across the data sources point to the complex demands of emergency distance education that teachers, as curriculum designers and enactors, need to bear in mind in order to craft productive pedagogies, constructivist or otherwise, during this unprecedented time.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.3.15


Keywords


constructivist learning; COVID-19 pandemic; curriculum materials; scaffolding; student perception; pandemic pedagogy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.%202020261309

Albert, J. R. G., Serafica, R. B., & Lumbera, B. T. (2016). Examining trends in ICT statistics: How does the Philippines fare in ICT? (No. 2016-16). PIDS Discussion Paper Series.

Akamai (2017). Akamai’s state of the internet. Akamai, 10(1). https://www.akamai.com/us/en/multimedia/documents/state-of-the-internet/q1-2017-state-of-the-internet-connectivity-report.pdf

Ayaz, M. F., & Sekerci, H. (2015). The effects of the constructivist learning approach on student's academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(4), 143-156.

Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70.

Boddy, N., Watson, K., & Aubusson, P. (2003). A trial of the five Es: A referent model for constructivist teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023606425452

Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, UK: Heinemann.

Bybee, R. W., & Powell, J. C. (1993). Investigating diversity and limits, middle school science and technology. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Publishing.

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Biological Sciences Curriculum Study.

Caggiano, G., Castelnuovo, E., & Kima, R. (2020). The global effects of COVID-19-induced uncertainty. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3598710

Cakir, N. K. (2017). Effect of 5E learning model on academic achievement, attitude and science process skills: Meta-analysis study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(11), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i11.2649

Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.205

Çimer, A., & Coskun, S. (2018). Students' opinions about their ninth grade biology textbook: From the perspective of constructivist learning approach. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n4p201

Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE publications. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20258

Department of Education. (2020a). The basic education learning continuity plan. (DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2020).

Department of Education. (2020b). Policy guidelines for the provision of learning resources in the implementation of the basic education learning continuity plan (DepEd Order No. 018, s. 2020). Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2019a). Policy guidelines on the k to 12 basic education program (DepEd Order No. 021, s. 2019). Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2019b). Alternative delivery mode learning resource standards (ADMLR STANDARDS) [version 12]. Department of Education.

Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533-568. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543075001027

Doolittle, P. E. (1999). Constructivism and online education. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Funa, A. & Prudente, M. (in press). Effectiveness of problem-based learning on secondary students’ achievement in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction.

Gross, K., & Gross, S. (2016). Transformation: Constructivism, design thinking, and elementary STEAM. Art Education, 69(6), 36-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224869

Gutierrez, A. F. (2014). Development and effectiveness of an educational card game as supplementary material in understanding selected topics in biology. CBE life sciences education, 13(1), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-05-0093

Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Association for Supervision, and Curriculum Development, 1250 N. Pitt Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.

Lehmann, D., & Hulbert, J. (1972). Are three-point scales always good enough? Journal of Marketing Research, 9(4), 444-446. https://doi.org/10.2307/3149313

Marcial, D. E., Caballero, R. D. B., Rendal, J. B., & Patrimonio, G. A. (2015). “I am offlineâ€: Measuring barriers to open online learning in the Philippines. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 45(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v45i1.1170

Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (pp.169-186). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770140111

Pear, J. J., & Crone-Todd, D. E. (2002). A social constructivist approach to computer-mediated instruction. Computers & Education. 38(1-3), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024558414766

Sañosa, M. (2013). Implementation of K to 12 curriculum program among grade 7 science teachers in Eastern Visayas. Journal of Society and Technology, 3, 37-44

Talidong, K. J. B., & Toquero, C. M. D. (2020). Philippine teachers’ practices to deal with anxiety amid COVID-19. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 25(6-7), 573-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1759225

Toraman, C., & Demir, E. (2016). The effect of constructivism on attitudes towards lessons: A meta-analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 62, 115-142. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.62.8

Tria, J. Z. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of education in the Philippines: The new normal. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), 2-4.

Van Bergen, P., & Parsell, M. (2019). Comparing radical, social and psychological constructivism in Australian higher education: A psycho-philosophical perspective. The Australian Educational Researcher, 46(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0285-8

Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107-114. https://10.10bslm80/17439884.2020.1761641


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493