Teachers’ intentions for outdoor learning: A characterisation of teachers' objectives and actions

Birgitta Wilhelmsson, Christina Ottander, Gun Lidestav

Abstract


The aim of this study is to examine nine Swedish teachers´intentions and educational objectives for outdoor learning, and how these educational objectives are implemented in outdoor activities. Further, the alignment between teachers´predifined objectives and the kinds of knowledge and cognitive processes reflected in the outdoor activities are investigated. The data sources consists of semi-structured interviews and observations. The intervirw transcripts were analysed using Haldéns theory of  intentional analysis to identify teachers' intentions when locating learning outdoors. Teachers´ objectives in the cognitive domain were further analysed by Bloom´s revised taxonomy. The teachers use a diverse set of outdoor activities. Our findings include a typology of four orientations: one that values affective and social objectives and promote activities to understand factual knowledge, another orientation focuses on activities intended to gain procedural knowledge and emphasizes application of practical tasks. The other two teaching orientations primarily focuses on cognitive objectives, partly to reinforce conceptual knowledge, partly to deepen understandings or improve strategies to enhance meta-cognitive knowledge. The degree of alignment between intended objectives and performed activity is higher among teachers promoting affective and social goals as well as meta-cognitive and analytical understanding, than teachers who use outdoor activities to mainly reinforce conceptual knowledge. The study shows that there is a range of possible learning goals in outdoor education and teachers are guieded by what they value and how they percive learning.

Keywords


Outdoor learning; intentions; Bloom’s taxonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. A revision of Bloom´s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Amos, R., & Reiss, M. (2012). The benefits of residential fieldwork for school science: Insights from a five-year initiative for inner-city students in the UK. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 485-512.

Bentsen, P. (2010). Udeskole: outdoor teaching and use of green space in Danish schools. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Copenhagen, Danish Centre for Forest, landscape and Planning and Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences.

Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373-1388.

Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-school learning: Formal, non-formal and informal learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171-190.

EU. (2007). Science Education NOW: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Retrieved March 8, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf

Frøyland, M. (2010). Mange erfaringer i mange rom. Oslo, Abstrakt forlag AS

Halldén, O. (2001). Social konstruktionism, konstruktivism och intentionell analys som heuristiskt verktyg i kvalitativ analys. In O. Halldén (Ed). Intentionell analys.

Forskningsrapporter från Pedagogiska institutionen, nr 65 (pp. 1-18). Stockholms universitet.

Jordet, A. (2007). â€Nærmiljøet som klasserumâ€: En undersøkelse om uteskolens didaktikk i et danningsteoretisk og erfaringspedagogisk perspektiv. Doctoral Dissertation, Universitetet i Oslo, Det utdanningsvitenskaplige fakultet.

Lager-Nyqvist, L. (2003). Att göra det man kan: en longitudinell studie av hur sju lärarstudenter utvecklar sin undervisning och formar sin lärarroll i naturvetenskap. Doctoral Dissertation, Acta Universitaits Gothoburgensis, Göteborg Studies in Educational Science.

Lai, K.C. (1999). Freedom to learn: a study of the experiences of secondary school teachers and students in a geography field trip. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 8(3), 239-255.

Linn, M.C,, Davis, E.A., & Bell, P. (2004). Internet Environments for Science Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Magntorn, O. (2007). Reading nature: developing ecological literacy through teaching. Doctoral Dissertation, Linköpings Universitet, Swedish National Graduate School in Science and Technology Education, FontD, Department of Social and Welfare Studies.

Mygind, E. (2009). A comparison of childrens’ statements about social relations and teaching in the classroom and in the outdoor environment. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 9(2), 151-169.

Nundy, S. (1999). The fieldwork effect: the role and impact of fieldwork in the upper primary school. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 8(2), 190-198.

Nundy, S. (2001). Raising achievement through the Environment: The case for fieldwork and field centres. Peterborough: National Association of Field Studies Officers.

Näsström, G. (2008). Measurement of Alignment between Standards and Assessment. Doctoral Dissertation, Umeå University, Department of Educational Measurement.

O´Brien, L., & Murray, R. (2007) Forest school and its impacts on young children: Case studies in Britain. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 249-265.

Openshaw, P. H., & Whittle, S. J. (1993). Ecological field teaching: How can it be made more effective? Journal of Biological Education, 27(1), 58-70.

Österlind, K., & Halldén, O. (2007). Linking theory to practice: a case study of pupils’ course work on freshwater pollution. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 16(1), 73-89.

Rea, T., & Waite, S. (2009). International perspectives on outdoor and experiental learning. Education 3-13, 37(1), 1-4.

Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K.; Morris, M., Choi; M., Sanders, K., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of Research on Outdoor Learning. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.

Sandell, K., & Öhman, J. (2010). Educational potentials of encounters with nature: reflections from a Swedish outdoor perspective. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 113-132.

The National Agency for Education, 2011. Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisure-time centre 2011. Retrieved March 9, 2012, from

www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2687

Wilhelmsson, B., Ottander, C. and Lidestav, G. (2012) Teachers’ intentions with outdoor teaching in school forests: Skills and knowledge teachers want students to develop, NorDiNa 8(1) 26-40.

Vetenskapsrådet (2006) Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. Retrieved February 15, 2011, from http://www.codex.vr.se

von Wright, G. H. (1979). The determinants of actions. In H. Kohlenberger (Ed.) Reason, action and experience. Essays in honour of Raymond Klibansky. (pp. 107-119). Hamburg, Felix Meiner verlag.

von Wright, G. H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493