Exploring the Acceptance of Mobile-Assisted Peer Feedback in English Speaking among Chinese EFL Students
Abstract
Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this quasi-experimental study examined the use of Mobile-Assisted Peer Feedback (MAPF) tools via the Tencent Mini Programme among Chinese university EFL learners to enhance English speaking proficiency. A mixed-methods approach was employed, using descriptive statistics for questionnaire data and thematic analysis with NVivo for interview data. Sixty non-English major students (CEFR levels A2-B1) were selected through purposive sampling and assigned to three groups: one-way, dialogic, and visualised peer feedback. Results showed positive responses across all modes, with visualised feedback rated highest for usefulness, behavioural intention, and speaking improvement. The study highlights the need to consider technological, individual, and sociocultural factors in mobile-assisted feedback for language learning. Future research should explore long-term effects, application in diverse contexts, and further refinement of mobile-assisted feedback modes to enhance learner engagement. This study contributes to the research on MAPF in English speaking and offers practical insights for educational technology development.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.9.17
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bahari, A. (2021). Computer-mediated feedback for L2 learners: Challenges versus affordances. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12481
Baker, M. J., & Baker, W. H. (2022). Qualitative oral-presentation feedback: Comparisons from business professionals, instructors, and student peers. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906221120015
Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
Chang, C., & Lin, H.-C. K. (2020). Effects of a mobile-based peer-assessment approach on enhancing language-learners’ oral proficiency. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(6), 668–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1612264
Chen Hsieh, J. S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, W.-C. V. (2017). Technological acceptance of LINE in flipped EFL oral training. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.066
Chen, J., Wang, M., Dede, C., & Grotzer, T. A. (2017). Design of a Three-Dimensional Cognitive Mapping Approach to Support Inquiry Learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 191–204. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26229217
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). e-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119239086.fmatter
Dai, Y., & Wu, Z. (2023). Mobile-assisted pronunciation learning with feedback from peers and/or automatic speech recognition: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(5–6), 861–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1952272
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877
Dong, L., Jamal Mohammed, S., Ahmed Abdel-Al Ibrahim, K., & Rezai, A. (2022). Fostering EFL learners’ motivation, anxiety, and self-efficacy through computer-assisted language learning- and mobile-assisted language learning-based instructions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 899557. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899557
Ebadijalal, M., & Yousofi, N. (2023). The impact of mobile-assisted peer feedback on EFL learners’ speaking performance and anxiety: Does language make a difference? The Language Learning Journal, 51(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2021.1957990
Er, E., Dimitriadis, Y., & Gaševi?, D. (2021). A collaborative learning approach to dialogic peer feedback: A theoretical framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 586–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1786497
Gong, H., & Yan, D. (2023). The impact of Danmaku-based and synchronous peer feedback on L2 oral performance: A mixed-method investigation. PLOS ONE, 18(4), e0284843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284843
Gu, X., & Cai, H. (2019). How a semantic diagram tool influences transaction costs during collaborative problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12307
Hoi, V. N., & Mu, G. M. (2021). Perceived teacher support and students’ acceptance of mobile-assisted language learning: Evidence from Vietnamese higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 879–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13044
Jonsson, A. (2012). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467125
Kartal, G. (2022). Evaluating a mobile instant messaging tool for efficient large-class speaking instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(5–6), 1252–1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2074463
Klimova, B. (2021). Evaluating impact of mobile applications on EFL university learners’ vocabulary learning: A review study. Procedia Computer Science, 184, 859–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.108
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). Mobile learning and the future of learning. International HETL Review, 2, 13–18. https://www.hetl.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/HETLReviewVolume2Article2.pdf
Morchid, N. (2019). The determinants of use and acceptance of mobile assisted language learning: The case of EFL students in Morocco. SSRN Electronic Journal, 5, 76–97. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3431747
Nguoi Chui Lam, C., Habil, H., & Min Hui, S. (2022). A mobile application developed for scaffolding ESL learners in providing peer feedback. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 7(2), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp291-313
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1253–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186
Rivas, C. (2012). Coding and analysing qualitative data. Researching Society and Culture, 3, 367–392. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/378176/
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
Shadiev, R., Liu, J., & Cheng, P. Y. (2023). The impact of mobile-assisted social language learning activities on speaking skills and self-efficacy development. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(5), 664–679. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3243721
Smith, D. A. (2017). Collaborative peer feedback. International Association for Development of the Information Society, 183–186. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED579292.pdf
Sumtsova, O., Aikina, T., Bolsunovskaya, L., Phillips, C., Zubkova, O., & Mitchell, P. (2018). Collaborative learning at engineering universities: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(1), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i01.7811
Topping, K. J. (2017). Peer assessment: Learning by judging and discussing the work of other learners. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.31532/InterdiscipEducPsychol.1.1.007
Vedechkina, M., & Borgonovi, F. (2021). A Review of Evidence on the Role of Digital Technology in Shaping Attention and Cognitive Control in Children. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 611155. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611155
Wan Azli, W. U. A., Shah, P. M., & Mohamad, M. (2018). Perception on the usage of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) in English as a second language (ESL) learning among vocational college students. Creative Education, 9(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.91008
Wang, Y.-C., & Hsu, L. (2020). Shall we go to the MALL?—Students’ perceptions of a business English learning app. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(2), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.2.1348
Wu, J. G., & Miller, L. (2020). Improving English learners’ speaking through mobile-assisted peer feedback. RELC Journal, 51(1), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219895335
Xu, Q., & Peng, H. (2022). Exploring learner motivation and mobile-assisted peer feedback in a business English speaking course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 1033–1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12660
Xu, Q., & Yu, S. (2018). An action research on computer-mediated communication (CMC) peer feedback in EFL writing context. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0379-0
Xu, Q., Dong, X., & Jiang, L. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions of mobile?assisted feedback on oral production. TESOL Quarterly, 51, 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.335
Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
Yao, J., Li, Y., Chen, X., & Yang, Z. (2023). A study on the impact of different real-time interactive visualization interfaces on college students' peer dialogue feedback. Journal of Distance Education, 2023(01), 102-112. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20230518001-N202305180005-00010
Yao, J., Li, Y., Pan, J., & Cheng, M. (2022). Research on the influence of peer dialogue feedback on college students’ online deep learning. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 40(3), 112–126. https://link.oversea.cnki.net/doi/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.03.010
Zhang, D., & Pérez-Paredes, P. (2019). Chinese postgraduate EFL learners’ self-directed use of mobile English learning resources. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(8), 1128–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1662455
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493