Empowering Future Innovators: A TRIZ-Integrated Design Thinking Approach to Engineering Prototyping and Entrepreneurship in Oman

Prekerthi Panikar, Colin Milligan, Ahmed Hassan Al Bulushi, Syed Mohammad Rizwan, Nabila Al Balushi

Abstract


The onset of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) introduced advanced technologies that engineering specialists could use to their benefit. This study sets out to explore if the engineering curriculum, as well as the engineering pedagogy, has had a chance for a facelift. Integrating technologies in design-thinking is seen as enhancing graduates’ skills in effectively incorporating technologies into engineering innovations. A survey data involving 200 third and fourth-year engineering graduates at the College of Engineering (CoE), National University of Science & Technology (NUST), Oman, were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to study the relationship between students’ self-perception of Integrated Design Thinking, Innovation Capabilities, Systematic Invention, and self-reported familiarity and the Knowledge of Engineering Innovation Tools, and self-confidence in Prototyping.  The findings reflect a positive relationship between the observed variable and Prototyping, thus consolidating the necessity for an educational framework integrating TRIZ, design thinking, and technology through pedagogy and assessments. In this way, universities can guarantee that graduates cultivate innovation capabilities, entrepreneurial mindset and proficiency in rapid prototyping and solution enhancement. Introducing engineering students to design and innovation requires a targeted method that aligns with best practices and emerging technologies to apply them in real problem-solving. This study evaluates the critical role of human-centered design thinking, aligned with the technology-centered TRIZ, in honing the predictive design approach to prepare the engineers of tomorrow through a transformation in pedagogy and assessments. This study on TRIZ-Integrated Design Thinking is the first in Oman and is expected to contribute to broader research involving other disciplines and stakeholders.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.2.17


Keywords


Integrated Design-Thinking; Engineering Entrepreneurship; Oman; Innovation Capability; Theory of Inventive Problem Solving- TRIZ

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al?Baimani, N., Clifton, N., Jones, E., & Pugh, R. (2021). Applying the ecosystem model in a new context? The case of business incubation in Oman. Growth and Change, 52(2), 663-686. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12471

Barak, M., & Goffer, N. (2002). Fostering systematic innovative thinking and problem solving: Lessons education can learn from industry. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020259623483

Beckman, S. L., & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California Management Review, 50(1), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166415

Belski, I. (2019). TRIZ thinking heuristics to nurture future generations of creative engineers. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2019.1699493

Bender-Salazar, R. (2023). Design thinking as an effective method for problem-setting and needfinding for entrepreneurial teams addressing wicked problems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00291-2

Bertoncelli, T., Mayer, O., & Lynass, M. (2016). Creativity, learning techniques and TRIZ. Procedia Cirp, 39, 191-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.187

Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2013). Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20038

Broo, D. G., Kaynak, O., & Sait, S. M. (2022). Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 25, 100311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100311

Cano-Moreno, J. D., Arenas Reina, J. M., Sánchez Martínez, F. V., & Cabanellas Becerra, J. M. (2021). Using TRIZ10 for enhancing creativity in engineering design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09704-3

Carvalho Botega, L. F., & da Silva, J. C. (2022). A data-driven Machine Learning approach to creativity and innovation techniques selection in solution development. Knowledge-Based Systems, 257, 109893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109893

Carlgren, L., Rauth, I. and Elmquist, M., 2016. Framing design thinking: The concept in idea and enactment. Creativity and innovation management, 25(1), pp.38-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12153

Cennamo, K., & Kalk, D. (2019). Real world instructional design: An iterative approach to designing learning experiences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203712207

Chang, D., Li, F., Xue, J., & Zhang, L. (2023). A TRIZ-inspired knowledge-driven approach for user-centric smart product-service system: A case study on intelligent test tube rack design. Advanced engineering informatics, 56, 101901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.101901

Chang, Y. S. (2022). Influence of virtual reality on engineering design creativity. Educational Studies, 48(3), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1754767

Chang, Y. S., Chien, Y. H., Yu, K. C., Chu, Y. H., & Chen, M. Y. C. (2016). Effect of TRIZ on the creativity of engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.003

Charosky, G., Hassi, L., Papageorgiou, K., & Bragós, R. (2022). Developing innovation competences in engineering students: A comparison of two approaches. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(2), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1968347

Chasanidou, D., Gasparini, A. A., & Lee, E. (2015). Design thinking methods and tools for innovation. In Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Discourse: 4th International Conference, DUXU 2015, Held as Part of HCI International 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 2–7, 2015, Proceedings, Part I (pp. 12–23). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20886-2_2

Chou, J. R. (2021). A TRIZ-based product-service design approach for developing innovative products. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 161, 107608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107608

Chryssou, C. E. (2020). University–industry interactions in the Sultanate of Oman: Challenges and opportunities. Industry and Higher Education, 34(5), 342-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219896748

Cropley, A. (2015). Creativity in education and learning: A guide for teachers and educators. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826270

Da Silva, R. H., Kaminski, P. C., & Armellini, F. (2020). Improving new product development innovation effectiveness by using problem solving tools during the conceptual development phase: Integrating design thinking and TRIZ. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(4), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12399

Deininger, M., Daly, S. R., Sienko, K. H., & Lee, J. C. (2017). Novice designers' use of prototypes in engineering design. Design studies, 51, 25-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.04.002

Dell’Era, C., Magistretti, S., Candi, M., Bianchi, M., Calabretta, G., Stigliani, I., & Verganti, R. (2025). Design thinking in action: a quantitative study of design thinking practices in innovation projects. Journal of Knowledge Management, 29(11), 32-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-04-2024-0424

Dodun, O., Cavique, M., Sl?tineanu, L., & Du?a, P. (2022). Using the axiomatic design in engineering. In Advances in Product Design Engineering (pp. 25–60). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98124-2_2

Dumas, D., Schmidt, L. C., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.002

Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x

Eisenbart, B., Bouwman, S., Voorendt, J., McKillagan, S., Kuys, B., & Ranscombe, C. (2022). Implementing design thinking to drive innovation in technical design. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 10(3), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2022.2048698

Ericson, J. D. (2022). Mapping the relationship between critical thinking and design thinking. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(1), 406-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00733-w

García-Manilla, H. D. (2023). Application of design thinking and TRIZ theory to assist a user in the formulation of an innovation project. In TRIZ in Latin America: Case Studies (pp. 57–79). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20561-3_3

Genco, N., Hölttä?Otto, K., & Seepersad, C. C. (2012). An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00041.x

Ghane, M., Ang, M. C., Cavallucci, D., Kadir, R. A., Ng, K. W., & Sorooshian, S. (2022). TRIZ trend of engineering system evolution: a review on applications, benefits, challenges and enhancement with computer-aided aspects. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 174, 108833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108833

Guaman-Quintanilla, S., Everaert, P., Chiluiza, K., & Valcke, M. (2023). Impact of design thinking in higher education: a multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), 217-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09724-z

Habbal, F., Kolmos, A., Hadgraft, R. G., Holgaard, J. E., & Reda, K. (2024). Reshaping Engineering Education: Addressing Complex Human Challenges (p. 265). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5873-3

Hede, S., Ferreira, P. V., Lopes, M. N., & Rocha, L. A. (2015). TRIZ and the paradigms of social sustainability in product development endeavors. Procedia engineering, 131, 522-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.447

Hua, Z., Yang, J., Coulibaly, S., & Zhang, B. (2006). Integration TRIZ with problem-solving tools: A literature review from 1995 to 2006. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 1(1/2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2006.011091

Jamieson, M. V., & Shaw, J. M. (2020). Teaching engineering innovation, design, and leadership through a community of practice. Education for Chemical Engineers, 31, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.04.001

Jiang, C., & Pang, Y. (2023). Enhancing design thinking in engineering students with project?based learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(4), 814-830. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22608

Jørgensen, F., & Busk Kofoed, L. (2007). Integrating the development of continuous improvement and innovation capabilities into engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790601116964

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

Lee, K. (2018). Innovative design thinking process with TRIZ. In D. Cavallucci, R. De Guio, & S. Kozio?ek (Eds.), Automated Invention for Smart Industries: 18th International TRIZ Future Conference, TFC 2018, Strasbourg, France, October 29–31, 2018, Proceedings (pp. 241–252). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02456-7_20

Lichtenthaler, U. (2020). A conceptual framework for combining agile and structured innovation processes. Research-Technology Management, 63(5), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2020.1790240

Liedtka, J. (2018). Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review, 96(5), 72–79.

Livotov, P. (2015). Measuring motivation and innovation skills in advanced course in new product development and inventive problem solving with TRIZ for mechanical engineering students. Procedia Engineering, 131, 767–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.374

Martorelli, M., & Gloria, A. (2023). Strategies and generative design towards the development of innovative products. In Springer Handbook of Additive Manufacturing (pp. 269–286). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20752-5_17

Mawale, M. B., Kuthe, A. M., & Dahake, S. W. (2016). Additive layered manufacturing: State-of-the-art applications in product innovation. Concurrent Engineering, 24(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293x15613111

Mendoza-Silva, A. (2021). Innovation capability: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 707–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2019-0263

Meyer, M. H., Lee, C., Kelley, D., & Collier, G. (2020). An assessment and planning methodology for university-based entrepreneurship ecosystems. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 29(2), 259–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355720930571

Miranda, J., Navarrete, C., Noguez, J., Molina-Espinosa, J. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Navarro-Tuch, S. A., & Molina, A. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93, 107278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278

Mohammadi, A., Yang, J., Borgianni, Y., & Zeng, Y. (2024). Barriers and enablers of TRIZ: A literature analysis using the TASKS framework. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(4), 1206–1230. https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-01-2022-0066

Nguyen, H. N., Lasa, G., Iriarte, I., Atxa, A., Unamuno, G., & Galfarsoro, G. (2022). Human-centered design for advanced services: A multidimensional design methodology. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 53, 101720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101720

Oman, S. K., & Tumer, I. Y. (2010). Assessing creativity and innovation at the concept generation stage in engineering design: A classroom experiment. In ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 821–829). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2010-29021

Ovbiagbonhia, A. R., Kollöffel, B., & Brok, P. D. (2023). Investigating the impact of innovation competence instruction in higher engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(6), 1068-1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2219216

Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking – A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637

Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011

Park, S. J. (2023). Testing the effects of a TRIZ invention instruction program on creativity beliefs, creativity, and invention teaching self-efficacy. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12883–12902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11614-x

Petrakis, K., Wodehouse, A., & Hird, A. (2021). Physical prototyping rationale in design student projects: an analysis based on the concept of purposeful prototyping. Design Science, 7, e7. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.6

Petrov, V. (2019). TRIZ. Theory of inventive problem solving. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04254-7

Qiu, C., Tan, J., Liu, Z., Mao, H., & Hu, W. (2022). Design theory and method of complex products: A review. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 35(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00779-0

Rambocas, M., & Gama, J. (2013). Marketing research: The role of sentiment analysis. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-05-2017-0030

Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?. Review of educational research, 82(3), 330-348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429

Ringle, Christian M., Wende, Sven, & Becker, Jan-Michael. (2024). SmartPLS 4. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com

Saunila, M., & Ukko, J. (2012). A conceptual framework for the measurement of innovation capability and its effects. Baltic Journal of Management, 7(4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261211272139

Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of creativity: Introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420038958

Selznick, B. S., & Mayhew, M. J. (2018). Measuring undergraduates’ innovation capacities. Research in Higher Education, 59, 744–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9486-7

Sheng, I. L. S. (2023, August). Improving product ideation among engineering undergraduates using TRIZ and design thinking. In 2023 IEEE 12th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED) (pp. 41–43). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iceed59801.2023.10264033

Spreafico, C. (2022). Can TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) strategies improve material substitution in eco-design? Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 889–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.010

Tavanti, M. (2023). Design thinking for sustainable innovation. In Developing Sustainability in Organizations: A Values-Based Approach (pp. 405-423). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36907-0_14

Tidd, J. (2023). Managing innovation. IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Society Body of Knowledge (TEMSBOK), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119987635.ch6

Vijayakumar Bharathi, S., & Pande, M. B. (2024). Does constructivism learning approach lead to developing creative thinking skills? The mediating role of online collaborative learning environments. Journal of Computers in Education, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00321-2

Wang, Z., Zheng, P., Li, X., & Chen, C. H. (2022). Implications of data-driven product design: From information age towards intelligence age. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 54, 101793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101793

Weigert, A. P., & de Carvalho, M. A. (2023). New services ideation: IDEATRIZ methodology application. In TRIZ in Latin America: Case Studies (pp. 105–127). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20561-3_5

Wu, Z. (2022). Understanding teachers' cross-disciplinary collaboration for STEAM education: Building a digital community of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101178

Yin, Y. H., Nee, A. Y., Ong, S. K., Zhu, J. Y., Gu, P. H., & Chen, L. J. (2015). Automating design with intelligent human–machine integration. CIRP Annals, 64(2), 655-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2015.05.008

Zachariadis, M., Scott, S., & Barrett, M. (2013). Methodological implications of critical realism for mixed-methods research. MIS quarterly, 855-879. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2013/37.3.09

Zappe, S., Hochstedt, K., Kisenwether, E., & Shartrand, A. (2013). Teaching to innovate: Beliefs and perceptions of instructors who teach entrepreneurship to engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.7814/jeen5v4p5zhk

Zlotin, B. and Zusman, A. (2020) TRIZ Software for Creativity and Innovation Support.: Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham.: 2364-2373. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_39


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493