Analyzing the Doctoral Candidates’ Level of Efforts to ‘Leapfrog’ Their Dissertation Accomplishment Needs

Hermayawati Hermayawati

Abstract


Completing a doctoral program is a significant challenge faced by many doctoral candidates worldwide. This multi-case study explores the level of effort demonstrated by doctoral candidates in overcoming challenges to complete their dissertations as one of the scientific writing works, which must be accomplished to achieve their doctoral degrees. The six doctoral candidates who were in process of finishing their dissertations, were involved in this study. In this case, three persons studied at an Indonesian state university while the three others studied at overseas universities. One of the six doctoral candidates is Malaysian while the five others are Indonesian. In-depth observations during their dissertation writing process were conducted to gather the data purposively. The gathered data were analyzed descriptively using member checking. This study revealed three key aspects of doctoral success. First, intrinsic motivation and strong intrinsic motivation (67%-87%) among five participants supported sustained effort, while low intrinsic motivation (37%) hindered progress. Second, concerning goals and study periods, clear goals and shorter timelines (e.g., four years) facilitated completion, whereas low goal focus and extended periods (over seven years) impeded progress. Third, concerning strategies for success, effective practices included goal-setting, persistence, and community engagement. Resilience was evident in some participants despite extended timelines, while lack of intervention strategies contributed to failure. These findings offer valuable insights for improving doctoral education practices. However, future studies are recommended to involve more participants and employ other scoring-rubrics to measure doctoral candidates level of effort.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.2.9


Keywords


Doctoral candidates; doctoral student; leapfrogging; level of effort; member-checking

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, G., Ishaq, M., Hassan, M., Ishaq, I., & Ahmed, M. I. (2022). Challenges in writing a research thesis/dissertation: Its effect on PhD students. International Journal of Business Management & Research, 11(2), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6368126

Aitchison, C. (2022). Doctoral writing development: Supervisors and institutional support (Part one). Doctoral Writing Blog. https://doctoralwriting.wordpress.com/2022/10/19/doctoral-writing-development-supervisors-and-institutional-support-part-one

Bloomberg, A. (2024). Doctoral studies as a precarious identity process: Deviance and the rational ideal of the doctoral process. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2420205

Cacciattolo, K. (2015). A comparison of depth interviews and observations as methods of data collection. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1377.4564

Chen, J., & Zhao, Z. (2024). A study on the influence of academic passion on PhD students’ research engagement—The role of ambidextrous learning and academic climate. PLOS ONE, 19(6), e0303275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303275

Crawford, C. M. (2020). The 10 “C”s towards authentically supporting doctoral students: Gracefully and successfully supporting doctoral students towards completing the capstone experience. University of Houston. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9707-0.ch006

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

CSDT. (2024). Intrinsic motivation inventory (IMI). Center for Self-determination Theory. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/intrinsic-motivation-inventory

Fairbanks, B. (2024). The difference between doctoral students and doctoral candidates. University of Phoenix. https://www.phoenix.edu/blog/doctoral-candidate-vs-doctoral-student.html

Glockmann, M., Li, Y., Lakes, T., Kropp, J. P., & Rybski, D. (2021). Quantitative evidence for leapfrogging in urban growth. SAGE Journals, 49(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808321998713

Hermayawati, H. (2021). Analysis of the submitted lecturers’ scientific works in a reputable international journal: A multiple case study. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(3), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.6

Hytham, M. (2024). Level of effort activities: Tips and tricks for successful scheduling. Planning Engineer. https://planningengineer.net/level-of-effort-activities-tips-and-tricks-for-successful-scheduling

Indeed Editorial Team. (2023). What is level of effort? A definitive guide. Indeed Career Guide. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/level-of-effort

Indeed Editorial Team. (2024). 3 types of goals (plus tips for setting and executing them). Indeed Career Guide. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/3-types-of-goals

Indrayadi, T. (2023). Doctoral students’ challenges in preparing and publishing research in reputable international journals. Issues in Educational Research, 33(3), 1012–1029. http://www.iier.org.au/iier33/indrayadi.pdf

Litalien, D., Tóth-Király, I., Guay, F., & Morin, A. J. S. (2024). Motivational pathways to student engagement: A longitudinal model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 77, 102279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102279

Misdalina, U., Asmawi, M., & Sujanto, B. (2020). Analysis of lecturers’ work performance based on pedagogy competence and work motivation. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 6(8), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v6i8.el07

Nagy, R. (2016). Tracking and visualizing student effort: Evolution of a practical analytics tool for staff and student engagement. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.32.8

Ndlovu, V., & Newman, P. (2020). Leapfrog technology and how it applies to trackless tram. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 10(3), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2020.103013

Oxford Languages. (2024). Verb, gerund or present participle: Leapfrogging. Oxford University Press. https://languages.oup.com/google-dictionary-en

PMO Team. (2024). 7-step guide on how to assess level of effort together for accurate planning. ClickUp Blog. https://clickup.com/blog/level-of-effort/

Rafi, M. S., & Moghees, A. (2022). Writing challenges, causes, and strategies to facilitate the doctoral dissertation?writing process: A qualitative analysis. International Social Science Journal, 73(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12367

Scott, J. (2024). Understanding level of effort (LoE) and its importance for scoping. ScopeStack Blog. https://scopestack.io/understanding-level-of-effort-loe-and-its-importance-for-scoping

Sitompul, S. K., & Anditasari, A. W. (2022). Challenges in writing academic research: An exploration of master’s students’ experiences. Getsempena English Education Journal, 9(2), 136–148. https://ejournal.bbg.ac.id/gee

Suman, K. R. (2024). Supporting doctoral candidates through completion and final examination. Encyclopedia, 4(2), 836–846. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020053

Wahidah, E. Y., Sirait, S., & Kusumaputri, E. S. (2023). Doctoral student experiences in Indonesian postgraduate programs: A phenomenological investigation of challenges. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 4250–4261. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.4608

Wang, X., Wang, C., & Wang, J. (2019). Towards the contributing factors for stress confronting Chinese PhD students. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 14, 1598722. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2019.1598722

Winthrop, R., & Barton, A. (2017). Leapfrogging toward success in education: A new approach to addressing skills uncertainty and inequality across the globe. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/leapfrogging_toward_success_in_education

Wyllie, D. J. A. (2021). Thesis write-up and manuscript preparation: Related but distinct tasks. Journal of Physiology, 599(11), 2771–2775. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP281153

Yap, X. S., Truffer, B., Li, D., & Heimeriks, G. (2022). Environmental innovation and societal transitions towards transformative leapfrogging. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 44, 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.06.001

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yulianti, F., Zamzam, F., Aravik, H., Marnisah, L., Yustini, T., Satria, C., & Sanmorino, A. (2020). Improving lecturers’ scientific publication through capacity building moderation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 6014–6021. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082237

Zhang, W., Irwin, E. G., & Wrenn, D. H. (2016). Spatial heterogeneity, accessibility, and zoning: An empirical investigation of leapfrog development. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.Figshare.3201700


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493