Critical Reflections and Using Bourdieu-Scheerens Framework in Transformative Mixed Methods Teachers’ Licensure Review Evaluation
Abstract
This methodological paper presents critical reflections on transformative mixed methods based on a published study titled “Evaluation of University Review Program for Teachers’ Licensure Examination: A Transformative Mixed Methods Study Using Bourdieu-Scheerens Framework” in the International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. We introduce the paper in the introductory part and situate its contribution to transformative mixed methods literature. Our reflections reveal that the lead researcher’s personal and professional backgrounds, social awareness, and social responsibility were pivotal in the development of the LET Intensive Review and the Bourdieu-Scheerens framework used in the transformative mixed methods evaluation. The dominance of the qualitative research approach in the paper unveils the researcher’s educational orientation and identity. Finally, transformative mixed methods research holds immense potential for a contextually and culturally grounded educational evaluation.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.1.27
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arzadon, M. M., & Colicol, F. L. (2024). Making do in remote learning: Implications for
a. parental involvement policy reforms in the Philippines. The International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership, 31(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.18848/2329-1656/CGP/v31i01/47-67
Asian Development Bank. (2009). Poverty in the Philippine: Causes, constraints, and
a. opportunities. https://www.adb.org/publications/poverty-philippines-causes-constraints-and-opportunities
Barrett, B. D., & Martina, C. A. (2012). Towards a non-deterministic reading of Pierre Bourdieu: Habitus and educational change in urban schools. Policy Futures in Education, 10(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.3.249
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University
a. Press. (Original work published in 1972)
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice, Trans.).
a. Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1979)
Colicol, F. L. Puig, C. Z, & Judan, S. J. (2022). Evaluation of university review program for
a. teachers’ licensure examination: A transformative mixed methods study using Bourdieu-Scheerens Framework. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.16
Colicol, F. L., Sali-Latif, F. K. (2023). Parental occupation, social class, and school choice in southern Philippines: Their implications to educational public-private partnership vis-à-vis the K-12 SHS voucher program. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.19
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
a. approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
DeCuir-Gunby, J. T. (2020). Using critical race mixed methodology to explore the experiences of African Americans in education. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1793762
Doyle, L., Brady, A-M, & Byrne, G. (2016). An overview of mixed methods research-revisited. Journal of Research in Nursing, 2(8), 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987116674257
Estrada, J. E. (2010). An act to establish the national youth center of the Philippines and for
a. other purposes. https://legacy.senate.gov.ph/lisdata/83126867!.pdf
Fa`bregues, S., Molina-Azorin, J. F., & Fetters M. D. (2021). Virtual special issue on “Quality in Mixed Methods Research”. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211001974
Ghiara, V. (2020). Disambiguating the role of paradigms in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818819928
Haynes-Brown, T. K. (2025). The role of sampling in an explanatory sequential mixed methods study: General applications of the transformative paradigm. Methods in Psychology. 12, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2025.100176
Haynes-Brown, T. K., & Shannon-Baker, P. (2021). Integrating video evidence in mixed
a. methods research: Innovations, benefits, and challenges for research exploring how beliefs shape actions. Methods in Psychology, 5, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100068
Human Rights Watch. (2024). World report 2024: Philippines. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/philippines
Hunt-Anderson, I., Shannon-Baker, P. (2023). “I can’t say it”! Doodling to emancipate
a. adolescents’ voices in a transformative mixed methods study of covert bullying in Jamaican high schools. Methods in Psychology, 8, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2023.100114
James, D. (2014). Investigating the curriculum through assessment practice in higher education: The value of a ‘learning cultures’ approach. Higher Education, 67, 155– 169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9652-6
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed
a. methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
McCombes, S. (2023). Descriptive research | Definition, types, methods & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/
McCrudden, M. T., & Marchand, G. (2020). Multilevel mixed methods research and educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1793156
Mertens, D. M. (2007). Transformative paradigms. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3),
a. 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811
Mertens, D. M. (2010). Transformative mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry. 16(6),
a. 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364612
Mertens, D. M. (2022). Transformative-qualitatively driven mixed methods: For a change. https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.nova.edu/dist/a/4/files/2022/01/Transformative-Qualitatively-Driven-Mixed-MethodsMertens.pdf
Mindanao State University System. (2013). Overview. https://www.msu.edu.ph/about.php
Perez, A., Howell Smith, M. C., Babchuk, W. A., & Lynch-O’Brien, L. I. (2023). Advancing
a. quality standards in mixed methods research: Extending the legitimation typology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1) 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221093872
Rodil, R. (1999). The Lumads are our people, too! Paper presented at Bishops Ulama
a. Forum, Davao City. https:// iyil.ph/documents/24/Lumads-Our-People-Too.pdf
Russel, S. D., Davide-Ong, L., Gonzalez, A. R., Ty, R., Madale, N. T., & Medina, N. A. (2004). The Mindanao conflict and prospects for peace in the southern Philippines. Center for Southeast Asian Studies and Office of International Training, Northern Illinois University. https://www.niu.edu/clas/cseas/_pdf/lesson-plans/topical-overviews/mindanao-peace.pdf
Sayed, Y., & Ahmed, R. (2015). Education quality, and teaching and learning in the post- 2015 education agenda. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 330– 338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.11.005
Simeon, L. M. (2016). DA focus on 10 poorest provinces. Philstar Global. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/06/27/1597101/da-focus-10-poorest-provinces
Shannon-Baker, P. (2016). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815575861
Scheerens, J. (2011). Perspectives on educational quality. In J. Scheerens, H. Luyten, & J. van Ravens (Eds.), Perspective on educational quality: Illustrative outcomes on primary and secondary schooling in the Netherlands (pp. 3–33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0926-3_1
Ty, R. (2010). Indigenous peoples in the Philippines: Continuing struggle. Hurights. https://www.hurights.or.jp/archives/focus/section2/2010/12/indigenous-peoples-in-the-philippines-continuing-struggle.html
Veñegas, S., Dacela, M. A., Mangudadatu, B. I. S., & Takata, B. K. (2023). Epistemic injustice and indigenous education in the Philippines. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–10. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2190018
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493