The Cognitive Complexity of Technical Sciences: An Analysis Using the Depth-of-Knowledge Level Scheme

Xolani Mhlungu, Sam Mabune Ramaila, Umesh Ramnarain

Abstract


This study examines the content complexity of Technical Sciences through the Depth-of-Knowledge (DOK) Level Scheme to provide a nuanced understanding of how cognitive demands influence student learning and instructional strategies. Using a quantitative research design and a systematic content analysis approach, the study evaluates the DOK levels embedded in Technical Sciences curricula, instructional resources, and assessment tools. The research focuses on categorizing Technical Sciences topics across the four DOK levels: recall and reproduction, skills and concepts, strategic thinking, and extended thinking. Data were collected from educational materials across various contexts and analysed to identify patterns in content complexity. The findings reveal a heterogeneous distribution of DOK levels, with some topics requiring higher-order thinking skills while others emphasize foundational knowledge. Significant discrepancies in the application of DOK levels across educational contexts were observed, underscoring the need for a consistent framework in curriculum design. The study highlights the implications for educators and curriculum developers, emphasizing the importance of integrating higher DOK levels into instructional practices to foster learners’ critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and deeper conceptual understanding. Recommendations include adopting DOK-aligned teaching strategies in Technical Sciences and conducting further research to explore the relationship between content complexity and student achievement. By addressing these gaps, the study contributes to ongoing efforts to enhance educational outcomes and promote a more rigorous and relevant Technical Sciences curriculum.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.2.30


Keywords


Bloom’s taxonomy; cognitive level; content complexity; depth-of-knowledge level scheme; technical sciences

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allee, K. A., & Castner, D. J. (2025). Can implementing a developmental approach to teacher preparation help diversify the teaching force? Presenting an illustrative continuum of four unique teacher candidates. Journal of Education, 205(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574241289596

Alonzo, D. (2020). Teacher education and professional development in Industry 4.0: The case for building a strong assessment literacy. In Teacher Education and Professional Development in Industry 4.0 (1st ed., p. 8). CRC Press. https://doi.org/9781003035978

Ammar, M., Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). Role of pedagogical approaches in fostering innovation among K-12 students in STEM education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, Article 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100839

Bertram, C. A., Mthiyane, C. C. N., & Naidoo, J. (2021). The tension between curriculum coverage and quality learning: The experiences of South African teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 81, Article 102353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102353

Department of Basic Education (South Africa). (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement. Government Printer.

Department of Basic Education (South Africa). (2014). CAPS for Technical Sciences. Government Printer.

Fontno, T., & Williams, A. (2019, April). Using depth of knowledge questions to encourage deep thinking: Intentional questioning as an instructional strategy [Conference session]. ACRL Recasting the Narrative Conference, Cleveland, Ohio. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352358190

Hassan, E., Groot, W., & Volante, L. (2022). Education funding and learning outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa: A review of reviews. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, Article 100181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100181

Joseph, O. B., & Nwankwo, C. U. (2024). Curriculums development for interdisciplinary STEM education: A review of models and approaches. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(8), 1575–1592. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i8.1371

Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214

Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1477405

Kuehn, M. (2019). The South African technical and vocational education and training system from a German perspective [Conference session]. Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education. https://doi.org/10.2478/cplbu-2020-0026

Liu, J., Liu, Z., Wang, C., Xu, Y., Chen, J., & Cheng, Y. (2024). K-12 students’ higher-order thinking skills: Conceptualization, components, and evaluation indicators. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, Article 101551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101551

Lourdusamy, R., Magendiran, P., & Fonceca, C. M. (2022). Analysis of cognitive levels of questions with Bloom’s taxonomy: A case study. International Journal of Software Innovation, 10(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSI.297922

Lumapenet, H. T., Sanduyogan, M. D., & Dilangalen, A. K. (2023). Teachers’ preparedness and challenges towards performance in the new normal education. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 9(3), 4557–4561. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371701513

Masharipova, F. (2024). From Bloom’s taxonomy into Webb’s depth of knowledge: Enhancing lesson planning strategies. Emergent Journal of Educational Discoveries and Lifelong Learning (EJEDL), 3(4), 10. https://doi.org/10.47134/emergent.v3i4.50

Moloi, M. J., & Motlhabane, A. T. (2023). Curriculum integration of physical sciences, engineering science, and technology subjects in relation to the Technical Sciences curriculum. South African Journal of Education, 43(2), Article 2209. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n2a2209

Nsengimana, T., Mugabo, L. R., Hiroaki, O., & Nkundabakura, P. (2024). Reflection on science competence-based curriculum implementation in Sub-Saharan African countries. International Journal of Science Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2356971

OECD. (2018). PISA in Focus 2018/91: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) for Development - Results in Focus. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrs3b93c7v2-en

Pallikkara, V., Pinto, P., & D’Souza, R. (2022). Framework for identification of curriculum gaps: A systematic approach. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35(Special Issue 1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v35is1/22009

Pestovs, P., Saleniece, I., & Namsone, D. (2019). Science large-scale assessment alignment to the revised science curriculum [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 3rd International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education, BalticSTE2019. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED619808.pdf

Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, Article 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305

Schwerdt, G., & Wuppermann, A. C. (2011). Is traditional teaching really all that bad? A within-student between-subject approach. Economics of Education Review, 30(2), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.11.005

Varma, C., & Malik, S. (2024). Perspective chapter: TVET in the 21st century – A focus on innovative teaching and competency indicators. In J.-H. Ye, & M. Jiang (Eds.), Technical and vocational education and training. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112516

Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education (Research Monograph No. 8). Council of Chief State School Officers.

Webb, N. L. (1999). Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states (Research Monograph No. 18). National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Council of Chief State School Officers.

Zhao, L., Zhao, B., & Li, C. (2023). Alignment analysis of teaching–learning-assessment within the classroom: How teachers implement project-based learning under the curriculum standards. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 5, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00078-1

Zindi, B. (2024). Challenges impeding the implementation of effective continuous teacher professional development programs in Eastern Cape Department of Education. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(4), 46–61. https://doi.orgthe /10.61093/bel.7(4).46-61.2023


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493