Learning Space Design and Classroom Behavior

Edward J Baum

Abstract


This report describes a study of the impact of learning space design on student and instructor behavior.  We investigated learning space features that enable guided inquiry instruction in two different classrooms, a typical node classroom, and a spoke classroom, the Steelcase Learn Lab.   Students report that group cohesiveness, engagement, task orientation, and cooperation are encouraged in both classrooms. Both classrooms are not equally satisfactory for the same types of activity, however.   The Spoke classroom best supports and is clearly preferred for group activities such as case studies, discussions, and debates.  The seating offers excellent sight lines, enabling everyone in the room to easily interact with everyone else as well as see visual presentations.  The seating arrangement in the Node classroom fragments the class into small study/research groups, making it an ideal environment to apply various well-known small-group active learning methods such as “Physics by Inquiry†and “Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learningâ€.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.9.3


Keywords


classroom management, active learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acker, R and Miller, M (2005). “Campus Learning Spaces: Investing in How Students Learnâ€, Educause Centre for Applied Research, ECAR Research Bulletin, Vol 2005(8).

AMA Alexi Marmot Associates (2006). “Spaces for learning. A review of learning spaces in further and higher education.â€, A report for the Scottish Funding Council prepared by AMA Alexi Marmot Associates in association with HAA design.

Argyle, M (1975). Bodily Communication. Methuen, London.

Banning, J.H. (1992). “The connection between learning and the learning environmentâ€, Children,. Learning & School Design, The First National Invitational Conference for Architects and Educators, p.24

Brase, W. (1988). “Design criteria for effective classroomsâ€, Planning for Higher Education, 17(1), 81-91.

Brooks, D.C. (2011). Space matters. The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. J. Educ. Technol., 42, 719-726.

Brooks, D.C. (2012). Space and Consequences: The Impact of Different Formal Learning Spaces on Instructor and Student Behavior. J. Learning Spaces, 1 (2).

Brown, B. and Lippincott, J. (2003). “Learning spaces: more than meets the eyeâ€, Educause Quarterly No. 1, 14-16.

Cannon, R. A. (1988). “Learning Environment†in D. Unwin and R. McAleese (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Educational Media Communications and Technology, Greenwood Press, New York, 222-235.

Conway, K. (1993). “Master Classrooms: Classroom Design with Technology in Mindâ€, Resources in Education, http://www.iat.unc.edu/publications/conway/conway1.html.

Cruickshank, W.M. and Quay, H.C. (1970). “Learning and physical environment: The necessity for research and research designâ€, Exceptional Children, 37, 261-268.

Dopplet, Y., and Barack, M. (2002).Pupils identify key aspects and outcomes of a technological learning environment. J. of Technological Studies, 28(1), 12-18.

Dopplet, Y. and Schunn, C. D. (2008). Identifying students’ perceptions of the important classroom features affecting learning aspects of a designed-based learning environment. Learning Environ. Research, 11, 195-209.

Dori, Y. and Belcher, J. (2004). “How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetic concepts?â€, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243-279

Earthman, G. I., and Lemaster, L. (1996). Review of the research on the relationship between school buildings, student achievement, and student behavior. Report Number: EF005023, Council of Environmental Facility Planners International, Scottsdale, Arizona

Ellett, C. D., Loup, K. S., Culross, R. R., McMullen, J. H., and Rugutt, J. K. (1997). Assessing Enhancement of Learning, Personal Learning Environment, and Student Efficacy: Alternatives to Traditional Faculty Evaluation in Higher Education, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 167-192.

Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment:, Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22, 201–204.

Espey, M. (2008). “Does Space Matter? Classroom Design and Team-Based Learningâ€, Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(4), 764-775.

Fisher, K. (2000). “Building Better Outcomes: The Impact of School Infrastructure on Student Outcomes and Behaviorâ€, Schooling Issues Digest.

Fraser, B. J., Giddings, J. G., and McRobbie, J. C. (1995). Evolution and validation form of an instrument for assessing node classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 399–422.

Fraser, B. J. (1998). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects, and determinants. In Fraser, B. J., and Tobin, K. G., (Eds.) International Handbook of Science Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 527-564.

Hare, A. P., and Bales, R. F. (1963). Seating position and small group interaction. Sociometry, 26, 480-486.

Henderson, D., Fisher, D., and Fraser, B. (2000). Interpersonal behavior, laboratory learning environments and student outcomes in senior biology classes. J. Research in Science Teaching, 32, 399-422.

Hill, M. C. and Epps, K. K. (2009). “Does Physical Classroom Environment Affect Student Performance, Student Satisfaction, and Student Evaluation of Teaching in the College Environment?â€, Proceedings of the Academy of Educational Leadership, 14(1), 15-19.

Hunley, S. and Schaller, M. (2009). “Assessment: The key to Creating Spaces that Promote Learningâ€, Educause Review, 44(2), 26-34.

Hurst, M. D. (2005). “Schools eye future costsâ€, Education Week, 24(35), 34-39.

Kroemer, K. and Grandjean, E. (1997). Fitting the Task to the Human: a textbook of occupational ergonomics, Fifth Edition, Taylor and Francis, London

Laws, P. 1991. “Workshop Physics: Learning Introductory Physics by Doing It.†In D. DeZure, D. (Ed)., Learning from change, landmarks in teaching and learning in higher education, pp. 247-248.

Muthyala, Rajeev S., and Wei Wei, 2013. Does Space Matter? Impact of Classroom Space on Student Learning in an Organic-First Curriculum, J. Chemical Education, 2013, 90, 45-50.

Monahan, T. (2002). "Flexible Space and Built Pedagogy: Emerging IT Embodiments," Inventio, 4(1), 1-19.

Moore, G. T. (1986). “Effects of the Spatial Definition of Behavior Settings on Children's Behavior: A Quasi-Experimental Field Studyâ€, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 205-231.

Oliver-Hoyo, M.T., Allen, D., Hunt,W.F., Hutson J., and Pitts, A. 2004. Effects of an active learning environment: Teaching innovations at a research I institution. J. Chem Educ., 81, 441-448.

Rosenfield, P., Lambert, N. M. and Black, A. (1985). Desk arrangement effects on pupil classroom behaviour. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 1, 101–108.

Sanoff, H. (1994). The School Building Assessment Manual. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Sanoff, H. (2000). Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning. John Wiley, & Sons, New York.

Schneider, M. (2002). “Do school facilities affect academic outcomes?â€, National Clearing house for Educational Facilities, November 2002.

Scott-Weber, L., Marini, M., and Abraham, J. (2000). Higher education classrooms fail to meet needs of faculty and students, J. of Interior Design, 26(1), 16-34.

Sommer, R. and Olsen, H. (1980). “The soft classroomâ€, Environment and Behavior, 12 (1) 1 3-16.

Spencer, J. N., & Moog, R. S., 2008. “The Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Approach to Teaching Physical Chemistryâ€. In M.D. Ellison & T.A. Schoolcraft (Eds.), Advances in Teaching Physical Chemistry: ACS Symposium Series 973 (pp. 268-279). Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society.

Strange, C. C., and Banning, J. H. (2001). Educating by Design : Creating Campus Learning Environments That Work, Jossey-Bass.

Steinzor, B (1950). â€The spatial factor in face-to-face discussion groupsâ€, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45, 552-555.

Syllabus Media Group (2005). “Designing the Space: A conversation with William J. Mitchell, Campus Technologyâ€, Syllabus Media Group, June 2003, www.campus- technology.com/article.

Tanner, C. K. (2000). “The Influence of School Architecture on Academic Achievementâ€, Journal of Educational Administration, 38 (4), 309-330.

Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. J. of Higher Education, 68(6), 599-623.

Veltri, S., Banning, J. H. and Davies, T. G. (2006). “The Community College Classroom Environment: Student Perceptionsâ€, College Student Journal, 40(3), 517-528.

Wannarka, R. and Ruhl, K. (2008). Seating arrangements that promote positive academic and behavioral outcomes: a review of empirical research. Support for Learning, 23 (2), 89–93.

Weinstein, C.S. (1979). “The Physical Environment of the School: A Review of the Researchâ€Review of Educational Research, 49 (4), 577-610.

Wong, F. L. A., and Fraser, B. J. (1996). Environment attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science and Technology Education, 14, 91-102.

Zandvleit, D. B. and Fraser, B. J. (2004). Learning Environments in Information and Communication Technology Classrooms, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(1), 97-123.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493