Trajectories through Vocational Education and Training
Abstract
This article presents a longitudinal study of students in vocational education in Norway. Statistics show that one third of the students do not complete their vocational education. In our study, we have followed 32 students over six years from the time they started their vocational education. The method was annual semi structured interviews. The aim of the study was to develop insights into how students tend to change course choices, occupational aspirations, and dispositions to learning as well as approaches to studentship throughout this significant period of their life. The intention has been to bring out the students’ own descriptions, understandings and experiences related to the main research question: What choices do young people make regarding education and occupation and what is the background for these choices? The study draws upon the concept «learning trajectories». We describe findings from the study by using the three metaphors “stayers, movers and leaversâ€. These categories describe the students’ different learning trajectories. The category stayers describes those who have completed their planned education at the appointed time. Movers describes those who have changed courses along the way, and the category leavers describes those who do not complete upper secondary education.Â
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.11.11
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barry, M. & Reschly, AL (2012). Longitudinal Predictors of High School Completion. School Psychology Quarterly 27(2), 74-84.
Beekhoven, S., & Dekkers, H. (2005). Early school leaving in the lower vocational track: Triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data. Adolescence, 40(157), 197-213.
Bloomer, M. & Hodkinson, P. (2000a). Learning careers: Continuity and change in young people’s dispositions to learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 26(5), 583-598.
Bloomer, M. & Hodkinson, P. (2000b). The complexity and unpredictability of young people´s learning careers. Education and Training, 42(2), 68-74.
Byrhagen, K. N., Falch, T. & Strøm, B. (2006). Frafall i videregående opplæring: Betydningen av grunnskolekarakterer, studieretning og fylke.[Dropout in upper secondary education: The importance of elementary school grades, field of study and county] SØF-rapport nr. 08/06. Trondheim: NTNU, Senter for økonomisk forskning.
Charmaz, K., Belgrave, L. (2012). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. I J. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. Marvasti, & K. M. Marvasti, K. M. (red.), Handbook of interview research (2. utg.) (s. 347–365). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Falch, T., Johannesen, A. B. & Strøm, B. (2009). Kostnader av frafall i videregående opplæring. [Cost of dropout in upper secondary education]. SØF-rapport nr. 08/09. Trondheim: NTNU, Senter for økonomisk forskning.
Falch, T. & Nyhus, O.H. (2009). Frafall fra videregående opplæring og arbeidsmarkedstilknytning for unge voksne. [Dropout from upper secondary education and employment for young adults].SØF-rapport nr. 07/09. Trondheim: NTNU, Senter for økonomisk forskning.
Fry, R. (2003). Hispanic youth dropping out of US schools: Measuring the challenge. Washington D.C.: Pew Hispanic Centre.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967/1999). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Hodkinson, P. & Hodkinson, H. (2003). Individuals, communities of practice and the policy context: school teachers’ learning in their workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 25(1), 3-21.
Katznelson, N & Pless, M. (2007). Unges veje mod ungdomsuddannelserne. København: Center for Ungdomsforskning.
Kuczera, M., Brunello, G., Field, S. & Hoffman, N. (2008). Learning for jobs: OECD reviews of vocational education and training Norway. Retrieved October 12, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/45/34/41506628.pdf
Lahn, L. (2011). Professional learning as epistemic trajectories. I S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, R. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (red.), Learning across sites. New tools, infrastructures and practices (s. 53-68). Abingdon: Routledge.
Lamb, S., Markussen, E., Teese, R., Sandberg, N., & Polesel, J. (red.) (2011). School dropout and completion: international comparative studies in theory and policy. Springer: Dordrecht.
Land, D., & Legters, N. (2002). The extent and consequences of risk in US education. In S. Stringfield, & D. Land (Eds.), Educating at-risk students: One hundred-first yearbook of the national society for the study of education (s. 1-28). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lillejord, S., Halvorsrud, K., Ruud, E., Morgan, K., Freyr, T., Fischer-Griffiths, P., Eikeland, O. J., Hauge, T. E., Homme, A. D. & Manger, T. (2015). Frafall i videregående opplæring. En systematisk kunnskapsoversikt. [Dropout in upper secondary education. A systematic knowledge overview]. Oslo: Kunnskapssenter for utdanning.
Markussen, E. (2016). Forskjell på folk! I K. Reegård & J. Rogstad (red.), De frafalne. Om frafall i videregående opplæring – hvem er de, hva vil de og hva kan gjøres? [The dropouts. About dropout in upper secondary education – who are they, what do they want and what can be done?]. (s. 22-61). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
Markussen, E. (2011). Frafall i videregående opplæring – i Norge og andre land. [Dropout in upper secondary education – in Norway and other countries]. Bedre Skole 1, s. 10-15.
Markussen, E., Frøseth, M.W. & Sandberg, N. (2011). Reaching for the unreachable: Identifying factors predicting early school leaving and non-completion in Norwegian upper secondary education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 55(3), s. 225-253.
Patterson, J. A., Hale, D. & Stessman, M. (2007). Cultural contradictions and school leaving: A case study of an urban high school. The High School Journal, 91(2), 1-15.
Reegård, K. & Rogstad, J. (2016). Avsluttende randbemerkninger. [Final edge notes]. I K. Reegård & J. Rogstad (red.), De frafalne. Om frafall i videregående opplæring – hvem er de, hva vil de og hva kan gjøres? (s. 199-207). Oslo: Gyldendal.
Rumberger, R.W. (2011). Dropping out. Why students drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Statistisk sentralbyrå (2017). Gjennomføring i videregående oppæring. [Implementation in upper secondary education]. Retrieved January 3, 2018 from https://www.ssb.no/vgogjen
Vibe, N., Frøseth, M.W., Hovdhaugen, E. & Markussen, E. (2012). Strukturer og konjunkturer. Evaluering av Kunnskapsløftet. Sluttrapport fra prosjektet «Tilbudsstruktur, gjennomføring og kompetanseoppnåelse i videregående opplæring» [Structures and developmental cycles. Evaluation of the reform Knowledge Promotion. Final report from the project «Offer structure, implementation and competence achievement in upper secondary education»]. Rapport 26/12. Oslo: NIFU.
Wittek, L. (2013). Sjanger som struktur for doktorgradsløpet og veien videre som forsker. [Genre as a structure for the PhD course and the way forward as a researcher]. Uniped 36(4), 5-19. DOI: 10.3402/uniped.v36i4.23146
Wittek, L. & Bratholm, B. (2014). Læringsbaner – om lærernes læring og praksis. [Learning trajectories – about teachers’ learning and practice]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493