Confrontation and Reconstruction of Beliefs and Attitudes towards Mathematics

Roland Pourdavood, Xiongyi Liu

Abstract


The problems of pre-service elementary teachers’ (PSTs) lack of mathematics content knowledge and pedagogy are filled with complexity. Understanding this complexity and providing PSTs opportunities to experience meaningful mathematics learning may be a step towards PSTs mathematical empowerment. This mixed-method study investigates PSTs’ prior mathematics learning experiences, beliefs and attitudes towards mathematics, and how these beliefs and attitudes are confronted and transformed during a semester-long methods course in mathematics. Data sources include survey questionnaires, PSTs’ verbal and written responses to various classroom assignments and activities, classroom observations, and instructor’s field notes. The findings of the study suggest that the PSTs’ prior learning experiences vary across grade levels and are related to their self-reported beliefs and attitudes towards mathematics teaching and learning to a minimal extent. With a constructivist environment promoting critical reflections and classroom discussions, the methods course provides the PSTs opportunities to question their prior experiences and examine their beliefs and attitudes. However, this transformative experience of the PSTs is a complex process which requires an ongoing professional development and support. Engaging PSTs in action research in their own classrooms is a step towards mass access and equity in mathematics teaching and learning and transforming culture of mathematics teaching and learning in public schools. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.19


Keywords


Pre-service teachers; Beliefs and attitudes; Mathematics teaching and learning; Constructivism; Transformative experience

Full Text:

PDF

References


Briley, J. S. (2012). The relationships among mathematics teaching efficacy, mathematics self-efficacy, and mathematical beliefs for elementary pre-service teachers. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 5, 1-13.

Burton, M. (2012). What is math? Exploring the perception of elementary pre-service teachers. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 5, 1-17. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ970350.pdf

Cardetti, F., & Truxaw, M. P. (2014). Toward improving the mathematics preparation of elementary pre-service teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 114(1), 1-9.

Chen, J., McCray, J., Adams, M., & Leow, C. (2014). A survey study of early childhood teachers’ beliefs and confidence about teaching early math. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(6), 367-377. doi:10.1007/s10643-013-0619-0

Cobb, P. (1994). Where is mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20. doi:10.2307/1176934

Cobb, P., & Yachel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 175-190. doi:10.1080/00461520.1996.9653265

Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1990). Classroom as learning environments for teachers and researchers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph, 4, 125-146 & 195-210.

Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(5), 451-462. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.36.5.451

Dreher, A., Kuntze, S., & Lerman, S. (2016). Why use multiple representations in the mathematics classroom? Views of English and German pre-service teachers. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 14, 363-382. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9633-6

Dweck, C., & Reppucci, D. (1973). Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(1), 109-116. doi:10.1037/h0034248

Edwards, S. (2017). Play-based learning and intentional teaching: Forever different. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 42(2), 4-11. doi:10.23965/ajec.42.2.01

Gentile, J. R., & Monaco, N. M. (1986). Learned helplessness in mathematics: What educators should know. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5(2), 159-178.

Gentile, J. R., & Monaco, N. M. (1988). A learned helplessness analysis of perceived failure in mathematics. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 10(1), 15-28.

Guba, E. G.,& Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Comparing paradigm in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.

Ismajli, H., & Imami-Morina, I. (2018). Differentiated instruction: Understanding and applying interactive strategies to meet the needs of all students. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 207-218. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.ii315a

Kloosterman, P. (1988). Self-confidence and motivation in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 345-351. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.80.3.345

Kostelnik, M. J., Soderman, A. K., & Whiren, A. P., & Rupiper, M. L. (2015). Developmentally appropriate curriculum: Best practices in early childhood education (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Kostos, K., & Shin, E. (2010). Using math journals to enhance second grades’ communication of mathematics thinking. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(3), 223-231. doi:10.1007/s10643-010-0390-4

Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Education Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 707-734. doi:10.1007/s11433-015-9422-5

Lika, M. (2017). The impact of curricula and lesson planning in the teaching process. Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law, and Social Science, 3, 240-247.

Livy, S., Muir, T., & Sullivan, P. (2018). Challenging tasks lead to productive struggle. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom. 23(1), 19-24.

Maher, C., & Alston, A. (1990). Chapter 10: Teacher development in mathematics in a constructivist framework. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 4, 147-210. doi:10.2307/749918

Marshall, H. H. (1994). Children's understanding of academic tasks: Work, play, or learning. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 9(1), 35-46. doi:10.1080/02568549409594951

McAfee, O., Leong, D. J., & Bodrova, E. (2016). Assessing and guiding young children’s development and learning (6th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 575-596). New York: Macmillan.

Morrison, G. S. (2017). History and theories: Foundations for teaching and learning. Fundamentals of Early Childhood Education (pp. 66-103). Boston: Pearson.

Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Baker, J., Westenskow, A., Anderson-Pence, K. L., Shumway, J. F., & Jordan, K. E. (2014). Predictors of achievement when virtual manipulatives are used for mathematics Instruction. REDIMAT - Journal of Research In Mathematics Education, 3(2), 121-150.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1995). Assessment standards for School mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards. Reston, VA: NCTM.

National Research Council (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics Education, Reston, AV: NCTM.

Reyes, L. H. (1984). Affective variables and mathematics education. The Elementary School Journal, 84(5), 558-581. doi:10.1086/461384

Saeed, M., Tahir, H., & Latif, I. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions about the use of classroom assessment techniques in elementary and secondary schools. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(1), 115-130.

Satsangi, R., Bouck, E. C., Taber-Doughty, T., Bofferding, L., & Roberts, C. A. (2016). Comparing the effectiveness of virtual and concrete manipulatives to teach algebra to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(4), 240-253. doi:10.1177/0731948716649754

Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 435-443. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.84.4.435

Sead, R., Jelena, S., & Elvir, C. (2016). Cooperative approach to learning in mathematics. Human Research in Rehabilitation, 6(1), 109-125.

Shirvani, H. (2009). Does your elementary mathematics methodology class correspond to constructivist epistemology? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(3), 245-258.

Sivakova, D., Kochoska, J., Ristevska, M., & Gramatkovski, B. (2017). ICT- The Educational programs in teaching mathematics. TEM Journal, 6(3), 469-478. doi:10.18421/TEM63-06

Steffe, L. P. (2016). Toward a model of constructivist mathematics teaching. Constructivist Foundations, 12(1), 75-77. doi:10.2307/749206

Stuart, C., & Thurlow, D. (2000). Making it their own: Pre-service teachers' experiences, beliefs, and classroom practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(2), 113-121. doi:0.1177/002248710005100205

Whiren, A. P., Soderman, A. K., Kostelnik, M. J., & Rupiper, M. (2014). Developmentally appropriate curriculum: Best practices in early education (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Yates, S. (2009). Teacher identification of student learned helplessness in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(3), 86-106. doi:10.1007/bf03217554

Yost, D. S., Sentner, S. M., & Forlenza-Bailey, A. (2000). An examination of the construct of critical reflection: Implications for teacher education programming in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(1), 39-49. doi:10.1177/ 002248710005100105


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493