Research-Based Biotechnology Book with Virtual Laboratory for Elevating TPACK of Biology Pre-Service Teacher
Abstract
This study aims to determine the development of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) biology education pre-service teachers using research-based biotechnology book equipped with a virtual laboratory. This research was conducted at the Biology Education Program-University of Jember, which involved 32 pre-service teachers who took the biotechnology course. This research applied Reflective, Recursive, Design, and Development (R2D2) design model and paired sample t-test to figure out differences between before and after using the developed product. The validation process involved six experts of content, media development, and user. The results of the book and virtual laboratory validation showed an average value of 86.17%, which is classified as a very valid category. The pre-service teacher response revealed an excellent value of 80.58%. Subsequently, a biotechnology book and virtual laboratory were used to test the TPACK competencies level of biology pre-service teachers. The paired sample t-test results showed 0,000 values, which means there were significant differences before and after the use of the research-based book and virtual laboratory developed. To summarize, a research-based biotechnology book equipped with a virtual laboratory can increase TPACK of biology pre-service teachers and recommend them as tools to teach biotechnology.Â
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.18
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alayyar, G. M., Fisser, P., & Vogt, J. (2013). Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in pre-service science teachers: support from blended learning. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(8), 1298-1316. https://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.773
Bal, S., Samanci, N. K., & Bozkurt, O. (2007). University pre-service teacher's knowledge and attitude about genetic engineering. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 119-126.
Brown, D, & Warschauer, M. (2006). From the university to the elementary classroom: pre-service teacher’s experiences in learning to integrate technology in instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 599-62.
Ching, S. C., Koh, J. H. L., Chin, C. T., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling of primary school pre-service teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Elsevier Journal of Computers & Educations, 1184-1193.
Degeng, I. N. S. (2001). Pedoman Penyusunan Bahan Ajar menuju Pribadi Unggul [Guidelines for preparing superior personal towards learning material]. Surabaya: TEP-PPS University of PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya.
Dyehouse, M., Diefes-Dux, H., Bannet, D. E., & Imbrie, P. K. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure undergraduates' nanotechnology awareness, exposure, motivation, and knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 500-510. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9117-3
Greene, H. A., & Petty, W. T. (1981). Developing language skills in the elementary schools. Boston: Alyn and Bacon, Inc.
Griffith Institute for Higher Education. (2008). Research-based learning: strategies for successful linking teaching and research. The University of Griffith.
Harris, J. B., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2012). Testing an instrument using structured interviews to assess experienced teacher's TPACK. Teacher Education Faculty Proceedings & Presentations Paper 15.
Moreland, J., Jones, A., & Cowie, B. (2006). Developing pedagogical content knowledge for the new sciences: the example of biotechnology. Teacher Education Journal, 143-155. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10476210600680341
Roothaar, R., Pittendrigh, B. R. & Orvis, K. S. (2006). The Lego® analogy model for teaching gene sequencing and biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 40(4), 166-17. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656039
Kohler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2006). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. J. Educational Computing Review, 32(2), 131-152. https://dx.doi.org/10.2190/0ew7-01wb-bkhl-qdyv
Kohler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. Michigan: Michigan State University Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education East Lansing.
Lesmono, A. D., Fitriyana, & Wahyuni, S. (2012). Development of physics practical instructions based on virtual laboratory on physics learning in middle school. Physics Learning Journal, 1(3), 272-277.
Liem, I., Napitupulu, J., Pangaribuan, A. C., & Turnip, T. N. (2010). Modeling of the virtual science laboratory. Batam Polytechnic National Seminar, 2(2), 2085-3858. Batam:Indonesia.
Muladi., Fahmi, A., & Ahmad, A. (2011). Development of interactive multimedia-based virtual biology laboratory. Seminar on Electrical, Informatics, and Its Education, 3(10), 65. Malang:Indonesia.
Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H., & Ayas, C. (2013). Exploring relationship among TPACK components and development of the TPACK Instrument. Educational InfTechnol Springer.
Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. (2008). Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary teacher education to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education, 50(3), 1084–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.006
Purwaningsih, E. (2015). Strengthening knowledge of physics materials with content representation (CoRe) for prospective physics teachers. Proceedings of the National Science Education Seminar. Bandung:Indonesia.
Pusparini, F., Riandi, R., & Sriyanti, S. (2017). Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) in animal physiology. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: 895 012059. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE). Bandung:Indonesia.
Puspita, R., & Yamin, M. (2008). Virtual Lab application information system at Gunadarma University information system laboratory. Proceedings, National Computer Scientific Seminar, and Intelligence System (KOMMIT 2008). ISSN: 1411-6286. Jakarta:Indonesia.
Roach M., Blackmore P., & Dempster J., (2000), Supporting high-level learning through research-based methods: interim guideline for course design. University of Warwick: TELRI Project.
Rosyid. A. (2016). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: a knowledge framework for Indonesian teachers in the MEA era. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Educational Innovation. Solo:Indonesia.
Schrum, L., Thompson, A., Maddux, C., Sprague, D., Bull, G., & Bell, L. (2007). Editorial: research on the effectiveness of technology in schools: The roles of pedagogy and content. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(1), 456-460.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Education Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Utomo, A. P., Prihatin, J., & Pujiastuti. (2014). Pengembangan bahan ajar IPA berbasis pendekatan Sains Teknologi Masyarakat (STM) pada pokok bahasan limbah dan penanganannya kelas XI Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) [Development of science learning material based on STS approach on waste handling topic in vocational school]. Pancaran Pendidikan, 3(4), 163-174.
Waris, A. (2009). Model pembelajaran berbasis riset di Prodi Fisika ITB [Research-based Learning Model in Study Program of Physics Bandung Intitute of Technology]. Berita Pembelajaran, 6(2), 1-3.
Widayati, D. T., Luknanto, D., Rahayuningsih, E., Sutapa G., & Harsono. (2010). Pedoman umum pembelajaran berbasis riset [Manual of research-based learning]. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.
Yeh, F. Y., Lin, T. C., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., & Hwang, F. K. (2015). Science teachers' proficiency levels and patterns of TPACK in a practical context. Journal of Science Educational Technology, 24(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9523-7
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493