Perceptions of Foundation Phase Teachers on Principals as Literacy Leaders in Selected Primary Schools

Bernadictus Plaatjies

Abstract


The bleak picture of South Africa’s poor learner performance in international tests is perceived to be linked to ineffective literacy leadership in primary schools. This paper therefore explores the perceptions of foundation phase teachers on principals’ capacities as literacy leaders. For this paper, literacy leadership is limited to two facets: instruction and assessment. As such, the study explored teachers’ perceptions on principals as leaders in these two aspects. As custodians of the literacy curriculum, teachers possess a wealth of knowledge on instruction and assessment practices. It seems that this rich knowledge and classroom experiences are sometimes untapped into or ignored, which would seem strange and unfortunate. If utilised to the maximum, teachers’ knowledge and expertise could contribute immensely to improve literacy practices. This exploratory qualitative study employed a multiple-case study design and was conducted with 35 teachers from four schools in the Mangaung district of Bloemfontein’s Free State Department of Education (FSDOE). The study sample was purposefully selected and data were collected through open-ended questionnaires. Thematic analysis was employed to make sense of the data, and the findings disclose that teachers hold conflicting views regarding their principals as literacy leaders. Although some noble leadership practices were underscored, especially regarding internal moderation processes, the general impression was that principals’ literacy leadership skills are lacking. This study has highlighted the need for a greater focus on subject‑specific leadership in general, but more so for literacy specifically.  

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.7.1


Keywords


instructional leadership; leadership; literacy; reading; writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adom, D., Ankrah, A., & Yeboah, A. (2018). Constructivism philosophical paradigm: Implication for research, teaching and learning. [online] Eajournals.org. Retrieved from http://www.eajournals.org/ wp-content/uploads/Constructivism-Philosophical-Paradigm-Implication-for-Research-Teaching-and-Learning.pdf

Alig-Mielcarek, J. M. (2003). A model of school success: Instructional leadership, academic press, and student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Bean, R. M., & Dagen, S.W. (2012). Best practices of literacy as leaders. Keys to school improvement. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Bomer, R., & Maloch, B. (2019). Lessons for leaders on the preparation of literacy educators. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(2), 259-264.

Botha, R. J. (2013). The effective management of the school: Towards quality outcomes. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

Bouchamma, Y. (2012). Leadership practices in effective schools in disadvantaged areas of Canada. Educational Research International, 2012(2). doi:101155/2012/712149

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge; Oxon.

Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). California: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

De Lange, M., Dippenaar, H., & Anker, J. (2018). Shared writing as first phase in writing instruction of Intermediate Phase Afrikaans Home Language learners. Per Linguam 34(1), 33-46. doi:10.5785/34-1-704

Dempster, N., Townsend, T., Johnson, G., Bayetto, A., Lovett, S., & Stevens, E. (2017). Leadership and literacy: Principals, partnerships and pathways to improvement (e book). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.10007/978-3-319-54298-0

Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2011). National Curriculum Statement (NCS). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement. English Home Language. Foundation Phase Grades R-3. Pretoria: Government Printer.

Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2015). Policy on the South African Standard for Principalship. Enhancing the professional image and competencies of school principals. Retrieved from https://www.sapanational.com/files/POLICY-ON-THE-SASP--2-.pdf

Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2016). Personnel Administrative Measures (PAM). Retrieved from https://www.naptosa.org.za/doc-manager/30-labour-matter/archived/920-pam/file

Department of Education and Training. (2018). Literacy and numeracy strategy phase 2. Achieving excellence and equity in literacy and numeracy. The Education State. Retrieved from: https://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/school/teachers/teachingresources/literacynumeracy/Literacy_and_Numeracy_Strategy_Phase_2.pdf

Durga, V. S. S., & Rao, C. S. (2018). Developing students’ writing skills in English: A process approach. Journal for Research Scholars and Professional English Language Learning, 6(2), 1-5.

Gasson, S. (2004). Rigor in Grounded Theory research: An interpretive perspective on generating theory from qualitative field studies. In M.E. Whitman & A.B. Woszczynski (Eds.), The handbook of information systems research (pp. 79-102). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Gunning, T. (2014). Assessing and correcting reading and writing difficulties (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 1-20.

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142.

Herrera, R. (2010). Principal leadership and school effectiveness: Perspectives from principals and teachers (Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan). Dissertations. 568. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/568

Hoadley, U. (2018). RESEP working paper. Leading for literacy: A Review of the research. Stellenbosch working paper (No. WP 19/2018). Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch.

Houck, B., & Novak, S. (2017). Leading the way in literacy: Classroom visits offer a comprehensive view of teaching on learning. The Learning Professional, 38(5), 30 34.

Howie, S. J., Combrinck, C., Roux, K., Tshele, M., Mokoena, G. M., & McLeod Palane, N. (2017). PIRLS Literacy 2016. Progress in International Reading Literacy Study 2016: South African Children’s Literacy Achievement. Pretoria: Centre for Evaluation and Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.up.ac.za/media/shared/164/ZP_Files/pirls-literacy-2016_grade-4_15-dec-2017_low-quality.zp137684.pdf

International Literacy Association (ILA). (2019). Principals as literacy leaders [Literacy leadership brief]. Newark, DE: ILA.

Kgatla, M. E. (2013). Principals’ perceptions of their instructional leadership role in the improvement of numeracy and literacy in primary schools (Master’s dissertation). University of Pretoria.

Klar, H. W., & Brewer, C. A. (2013). Successful leadership in high-needs schools: An examination of core leadership practices enacted in challenging contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 768-808.

Kubicek, M. R., (2015). Principals’ use of classroom walkthrough observations to improve instruction: a grounded theory. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska). Retrieved from Lear, M.L. (2017). Principal perceptions as literacy leaders at high-need elementary schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2244&context=etd

Leithwood, K. A., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstroom, K. (2004). Review of research: leadership influences student learning. Retrieved from http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/20135/1/CAREI%ReviewofResearch%2%20Leadership%20Influences.pdf

Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstroom, K. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. University of Minnesota: Wallace Foundation.

Manna, P. (2015). Developing excellent school principals to advance teaching and learning: Considerations for state policy. The Wallace Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Developing-Excellent-School-Principals.pdf

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). California: Sage.

Matsumara, L. C., Satoris, M., Di Prima, B., & Garnier, H. E. (2009). Leadership for literacy coaching: The principal’s role in launching a new coaching program. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(5), 655-693. doi:10.1177/0013161X09347341

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mbhalathi, N. B. (2017). Instructional guidance for literacy teaching in Limpopo, South Africa: A case study of the foundation phase policy and practice (PhD thesis). University of the Free State, Bloemfontein.

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Boston: Pearson.

Mestry, R. (2017). Empowering principals to lead and manage public schools effectively in the 21st century. South African Journal of Education. 37(1), 1-11.

Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counselling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology. 52(2), 250-260. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250

Munroe, J. (2011). Principals as leaders in literacy: A strategy for literacy improvement in primary schools. What Works. The Work Program: Core Issues 11. Retrieved from http://www.whatworks.edu.au/upload/1348031338415_file_CoreIssues11.pdf

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2019). Reading framework for the 2019 national assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board: US Department of Education.

Ogbonnaya, U. I., & Awuah, F.K. (2019). Quintile ranking of schools in South Africa and learners’ achievement in probability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 18(1), 106-119.

Pinello, G. S. (2015). A regression study: Middle school literacy leadership practices in Virginia. (Doctoral dissertation). George Washington University, Washington D.C.

Plaatjies, B. O. (2019). Investigating principal capacity in literacy instructional leadership at selected primary schools. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(3), 136 160.

Pretorius, U. (2001). ’n Geletterdheidsgereedmakingsprogram en die implikasies daarvan vir skoolgereedheid: ’n Sielkundig-opvoedkundige perspektief [A literacy preparation program and its implications for school readiness: A psychological-educational perspective] (PhD thesis). Unisa, Pretoria.

Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2017). An introduction to qualitative research: Learning in the field (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

Schmoker, M. (2006). Results now: How we can achieve unprecedented improvements in teaching and learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Scott, M. R. (2017). Challenges of Instructional leadership in Manitoba First Nation Schools: An exploration of what principals have to say (PhD thesis). University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626-663. doi:10.1177/0013161X11436273

Sebastian, J., Camburn, E. M., & Spillane, J.P. (2018). Portraits of principal practice: Time allocation and school principal work. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(1), 47-84. doi:10.1177/0013161X17720978

Spaul, N. (2012). The inequalities that lead to pupils’ poor performance. The University of the Free State, Bloemfontein: SA Media.

Spaul, N. (2014). Education quality in South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa: An economic approach (PhD thesis). University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch.

Spillane, J. P., & Hopkins, M. (2013). Organizing for instruction in education systems and school organizations: How the subject matters. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(6), 721-747. doi:10.1080/00220272.2013.810783

Superville, D. R. (2019). How deeply principals should know content areas and how much it matters for helping teachers in an active debate. Education Week, 39(9), 14-16.

Taylor, N., & Hoadley, U. (2018). Leadership for literacy: Exploring leadership practices in township and rural primary schools serving poor communities in South Africa. Final report on the case study schools. University of Stellenbosch, Department of Economics: RESEP.

Taylor, R., & Collins, V.D. (2003). Literacy leadership for Grades 5-12. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Townsend, T., Bayetto, A., Dempster, N., Johnson, G., & Stevens, E. (2018). Leadership with a purpose: Nine case studies of schools in Tasmania and Victoria where the principal had undertaken the Principals as Literacy Leaders (PALL) Program. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(2), 204-237. doi:10.1080/15700763.2016.1278245.

Vogel, L. R. (2018). Learning outside the classroom: How principals define and prepare to be instructional leaders. Education Research International, Article ID 8034270, 1-14. doi:10.1155/2018/8034270

Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press.

Zimmerman, L. (2017). Learning from the best: Reading literacy development practices at a high-performing primary school. Per Linguam, 33(2), 36-50. doi:10.5785/33-2-740


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493