Cultivating Problem-Solving Scholar-Practitioners: Impact of One CPED Program on Leader Self-Efficacy

Nancy Akhavan, Nichole Walsh, Janeen Goree

Abstract


This single case study is a qualitative inquiry into the cultivation of doctoral candidates and graduates on their efficacy as leaders in using inquiry as to approach problems of practice in daily work. The study examined a doctoral program in educational leadership at one large public university in California, USA. The case study methods included artifact analysis, an examination of field notes, and semi-structured one-on-one phone interviews. The data analysis of all sources revealed three themes related to participants’ leader self-efficacy in using scholarly inquiry on problems of practice in the field. Findings indicate that the participants grew in their leader self-efficacy, transformed, and confident in their sense of self as an educational scholar-practitioner to enact change. As a result of their experience in a Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) program, graduate participants also highlight the focus on inquiry processes to solve problems of practice as vital to educational leadership. Conclusions highlight considerations for similar programs when evaluating how they prepare graduates to impact education beyond coursework. Further research should emphasize how programs are addressing problems of practice for social justice to impact educational leaders in the field upon program completion. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.11.1


Keywords


education doctorate; leader self-efficacy; scholar-practitioner; problems of practice; educational leadership

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arrieta, G. S., & Ancho, I. V. (2020). Ready or Not: The Experiences of Novice Academic Heads in School Leadership. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 78–98. doi:10.26803/ijlter.19.5.5

Auerbach, S. (2011). “It’s not just going to collect dust on a shelf:†Faculty Perceptions of the Applied Dissertation in the New California State University (CSU) EdD Programs Leadership Education from within a Feminist Ethos. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 6(3), 59–82. doi:10.1177/194277511100600301

Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H.

Bandura, A. (1977b). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Buss, R. R. (2018). How CPED guiding principles and design concepts influenced the development and implementation of an EdD program. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 3(2), 40-47. doi:10.5195/ie.2018.57

Chitpin, S. (2014). Principals and the professional learning community: Learning to mobilize knowledge. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(2), 215-229. doi:10.1108/IJEM-04-2013-0044

Chowdhury, I. A. (2015). Issue of quality in a qualitative research: An overview. Innovative Issues and Approaches in Social Sciences, 8(1), 142-162. doi:10.12959/issn.1855-0541.iiass-2015-no1-art09

CPED. (2019a). Carnegie project on the education doctorate. Retrieved Nov. 25, 2020 from https://www.cpedinitiative.org/

CPED. (2019b). The framework: Guiding principles on the program design. Retrieved Nov. 24, 2020 from https://www.cpedinitiative.org/the-framework

Cresswell, J. A., & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cunningham, K. M. W., VanGronigen, B. A., Tucker, P. D., & Young, M. D. (2019). Using powerful learning experiences to prepare school leaders. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 14(1), 74–97. doi:10.1177/1942775118819672

Denzin, N. K. (2017). Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1) 8-16. doi:10.1177/1077800416681864

Fairholm, M. R. (2014). Trans-leadership linking influential theory and contemporary research. In R. S., Morse, T. F., Buss & C. M, Kinghorn, (eds.), Transforming public leadership for the 21st century, 105-124. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315698588

Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and leading reform. Oxford, UK: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes Institute.

Gibney, J. (2011). Knowledge in a “shared and interdependent worldâ€: Implications for a progressive leadership of cities and regions. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 613-627. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.548474

Hamann, E. T., & Trainin, G. (2018). Problems of practice as stance. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Educational Practice, 3(2), 48-50. Retrieved Nov 28, 2020 from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/teachlearnfacpub/346/

Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., & Harms, P. D. (2008). Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(6), 669-692. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.007

Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Chan, A. (2012). Leader self and means efficacy: A multi-component approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118(2), 143–161. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.007

Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Chan, A. (2013). Leader self and means efficacy measure. PsycTESTS Dataset. doi:10.1037/t24459-000

Hannah, S. T., Woolfolk, R. L., & Lord, R. G. (2009). Leader selfâ€structure: a framework for positive leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(2), 269-290. doi:10.1002/job.586

Hovannesian, A. (2013). CPED: Reshaping perceptions of the scholarly practitioner. Planning and Changing, 44(3/4), 308-316. Retrieved Nov 28, 2020 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1145947

Jenkins, D. (2020). What the best leadership educators do: A sequential explanatory mixed methods study of instructional and assessment strategy use in leadership education. Journal of Leadership Education, 19(4). doi:10.12806/v19/i4/r4

Kennedy, B. L., Bondy, E., Dana, N. F., Vescio, V., & Ma, V. W. (2019). The development and enactment of practitioner scholarship among graduates from one online Ed.D. programme. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(5), 653–669. doi:10.1080/0309877x.2019.1576858

Lenihan, P., Welter, C., Brandt-Rauf, P., Neuberger, B., Pinsker, E., Petros, M., &Risely, K. (2015). The University of Illinois at a Chicago school of public health doctor of public health program: An innovative approach to doctoral-level practice leadership development. American Journal of Public Health, 105(1), S55-S57. doi:10.2105/ajph.2014.302331

Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. Princeton, NJ: The Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.

Morrison, A. R. (2018). Beyond the status quo – setting the agenda for effective change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 511–529. doi:10.1177/1741143216682500

Murphy, J. & Vriesenga, M. (2007). Research on school leadership preparation in the United States: An analysis. School Leadership and Management, 26(2), 183-195. doi:10.1080/13634230600589758

Peterson, D. S. (2017). Preparing scholarly practitioners: Redesigning the EdD to reflect CPED principles. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 2(1). doi:10.5195/ie.2017.30

Peterson, D. S., Perry, J. A., Dostilio, L. D., & Zambo, D. (2016). Community engaged faculty: A must for preparing impactful EdD graduates. Metropolitan Universities Journal, 27(2): 59-73. doi:10.18060/21127

Peurach, D. J. (2016). Innovating at the nexus of impact and improvement: Leading educational improvement networks. Educational Researcher, 45(7), 421-429. doi:10.3102/0013189X16670898

Ramsey, A. (2019, January 25). The poverty line in Fresno. Fox 26 News. Retrieved Nov 28, 2020 from https://kmph.com/news/local/the-poverty-line-in-fresno

Rettke, H., Pretto, M., Spichiger, E., Frei, I. A., & Spirig, R. (2018). Using reflexive thinking to establish rigor in qualitative research. Nursing Research, 67(6), 490–497. doi:10.1097/nnr.0000000000000307

Rogers, R., Schaenen, I., Schott, C., O’Brien, K., Trigos-Carrillo, L., Starkey, K., & Chasteen, C. C. (2016). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature, 2004-2012. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1192-1226. doi:10.3102/0034654316628993

Sierra Health Foundation. (2016). California’s San Joaquin Valley: A region and its children under stress. UC Davis Center for Regional Change: Hartzog, C., Abrams, C., Erbstein, N., London, J. K. & Watterson, S. Retrieved Nov 28, 2020 from https://www.sierrahealth.org/assets/pubs/A_Region_and_Its_Children_Under_Stress-Web.pdf

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

Sudirman, A., & Gemilang, A. V. (2020). Promoting work-based learning as a praxis of educational leadership in higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 149-173. doi:10.26803/ijlter.19.3.9

Thanaraj, A. (2016). Improving leadership practice through the power of reflection: an epistemological study. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(9), 28-43. Retrieved Nov 28, 2020 from http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/757/pdf

Thompson, J., Hagenah, S., Lowhwasser, K., & Laxton, K. (2015). Problems without ceilings: How mentors and novices frame and work on problems-of-practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(4), 363-381. doi:10.1177/0022487115592462

University of Cumbria. (2020). Gibb’s Reflective Cycle. Retrieved Nov 28, 2020 from https://my.cumbria.ac.uk/media/MyCumbria/Documents/ReflectiveCycleGibbs.pdf

Vasudeva, A. (2017). Adapted from the 2017 CPED convening presentation: Reflections and new directions on CPED’s 10th anniversary. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 2(1), 1-5. doi:10.5195/ie.2017.47

Welch, O. M. (2013). Interrogating our practice: Enacting a “yes and†CPED agenda at Duquesne university. Planning and Changing, 44(3/4), 149. Retrieved Nov 28, 2020 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1145892

Zambo, D. (2013). Elbow learning about change, leadership and research in an CPED-influenced program. Planning and Changing, 44(3/4), 237. Retrieved Nov 28, 2020 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1145923

Zambo, D., Buss, R. R., & Zambo, R. (2015). Uncovering the identities of candidates and graduates in a CPED-influenced EdD program. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 233-252. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.823932


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493