Preparing Pre-service and In-service Teachers to Teach Mathematics and Science Using an Integrated Approach: The Role of a Six-Week Summer Course

Roland G. Pourdavood, Meng Yan

Abstract


Many pre-service and in-service elementary teachers indicate that they have limited content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and experience regarding the integrated teaching of mathematics and science. Such limitation puts them in an uncertain and vulnerable situation in terms of planning and instruction. This qualitative, descriptive, and interpretative study examines the experiences of 28 pre-service and in-service teachers as they plan and teach during a six-week summer course on integration of mathematics and science instruction for 4th and 5thgrades. The research question is: how may a six-week summer course focusing on planning and teaching mathematics and science using an integrated approach enhance teachers’ knowledge, experience, and confidence in teaching? Data include participating teachers’ reflections on assigned readings, meeting discussions, collaborative planning and teaching, their final papers, and the instructor’s field notes. The findings suggest that the exchange of ideas and information along with the instructor’s ongoing support provides the teachers with opportunities to become more knowledgeable and confident in integrating mathematics and science. The study also suggests that ongoing professional development and school district administrative support are essential components for sustaining teachers’ professional development related to teaching mathematics and science from an integrated perspective.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.1.4


Keywords


collaboration; integration; interdisciplinary; professional development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, T. L. (1998). Prospective elementary teachers' mathematics subject matter knowledge: The real number system. Action in Teacher Education, 20(2), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1998.10462915

American Association for the Advancement of Science. AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press.

Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1349

Babbitt, B. C., & Van Vactor, J. C. (1993). A case study of mathematics learning disability in a prospective teacher. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 15(1), 23-37.

Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject matter knowledge part of the equation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Teachers’ subject matter knowledge and classroom instruction (Vol. 2, pp. 1- 48). JAI Press.

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554

Basista, B., & Mathews, S. (2002). Integrated science and mathematics professional development programs. The School of Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18219.x

Berlin, D. F., & Lee, H. (2005). Integrating science and mathematics education: Historical analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 105(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18032.x

Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (1995). Connecting school science and mathematics. Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum, 22-33.

Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (2010). Preservice mathematics and science teachers in an integrated teacher preparation program for grades 7–12: A 3-year study of attitudes and perceptions related to integration. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9164-0

Bossé, M. J., Lee, T. D., Swinson, M., & Faulconer, J. (2010). The NCTM process standards and the five Es of science: Connecting math and science. School Science and Mathematics, 110(5), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00033.x

Bragow, D., Gragow, K. A., & Smith, E. (1995). Back to the future: Toward curriculum integration. Middle School Journal, 27(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.1995.11496152

Brown, R. E., & Bogiages, C. A. (2019). Professional development through STEM integration: How early career math and science teachers respond to experiencing integrated STEM tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9863-x

Bruce-Davis, M. N., Gubbins, E. J., Gilson, C. M., Villanueva, M., Foreman, J. L., & Rubenstein, L. D. (2014). STEM high school administrators’, teachers’, and students’ perceptions of curricular and instructional strategies and practices. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(3), 272-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x14527952

Bybee, R. W. (1993). Reforming science education: Social perspectives & personal reflections. Teachers College Press.

Caprile, M., Palmén, R., Sanz, P., & Dente, G. (2015). Encouraging STEM studies labor market situation and comparison of practices targeted at young people in different member states. Policy Department A.

Charette, R. N. (2013). The STEM crisis is a myth. IEEE Spectrum, 50(9), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1109/mspec.2013.6587189

Charmaz, K. (2001). Grounded theory: Methodology and theory construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/00775-0

Christenson, J. (2011). Ramaley coined STEM term now used nationwide. Minona Daily News. https://www.winonadailynews.com/news/local/ramaley-coined-stem-term-now-usednationwide/article_457afe3e-0db3-11e1-abe0-001cc4c03286.html

Cobb, P. (1994). Where is mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x023007013

Cobb, P., & Yachel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31(3), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3103&4_3

Czerniak, C. M., Weber Jr, W. B., Sandmann, A., & Ahern, J. (1999). A literature review of science and mathematics integration. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 421-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17504.x

Davison, D. M., Miller, K. W., & Metheny, D. L. (1995). What does integration of science and mathematics really mean?. School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 226-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15771.x

Drake, S. M., (2000). Curriculum Handbook: Integrated curriculum. ASCD. http://www.ascd.org/publications/curriculum-handbook/425/chapters/Overview.aspx

Education Development Centre. IPS Group. (1969). College introductory physical science. Prentice Hall.

English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM education, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1

English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x

Frykholm, J., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting science and mathematics instruction: Pedagogical context knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18047.x

Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: A stand for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75397

Gomez, A., & Albrecht, B. (2013). True STEM education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 73(4), 8-16.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Comparing paradigm in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of educational psychology, 92(2), 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.331

Haigh, W. E. (1985). Improvement of under prepared mathematics and science teachers. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.

Haigh, W., & Rehfeld, D. (1995). Integration of secondary mathematics and science methods courses: A model. School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 240-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15774.x

Hays, D. G., & Singh, A. A. (2012). Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. The Guilford Press.

Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research (Vol. 500). National Academies Press.

Hopkins, S., Forgasz, H., Corrigan, D., & Panizzon, D. (2014, July 12-15). The STEM issue in Australia: What it is and where is the evidence. STEM Conference: STEM Education and Our Planet: Making Connections Across Contexts [Conference presentation]. Vancouver, Canada. https://stem2014.ubc.ca/

Huntley, M. A. (1998). Design and implementation of a framework for defining integrated mathematics and science education. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 320-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17427.x

Hurley, M. M. (2001). Reviewing integrated science and mathematics: The search for evidence and definitions from new perspectives. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18028.x

Isaacs, A., Wagreich, P., & Gartzman, M. (1997). The quest for integration: School mathematics and science. American Journal of Education, 106(1), 179-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/444180

Johnson. C. C., Mohr-Schoeder, M. J., Moore, T. J., & English, L. D. (2020). Handbook of research on STEM education. Taylor & Francis Publishing.

Judson, E. (2013). Development of an instrument to assess and deliberate on the integration of mathematics into student-centered science learning. School Science and Mathematics, 113(2), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12004

Koirala, H. P., & Bowman, J. K. (2003). Preparing middle level preservice teachers to integrate mathematics and science: Problems and possibilities. School Science and Mathematics, 103(3), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18231.x

Kruger, C. (1990). Some primary teachers’ ideas about energy. Physics Education, 25(2), 86-91. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/25/2/002

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2013). Is it STEM or "S & M" that we truly love?. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(8), 1237-1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9370-z

Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (1997). Integrated, interdisciplinary, or thematic instruction? Is this a question or is it questionable semantics?. School Science and Mathematics, 97(2), 57.

Lehman, J. R. (1994). Integrating science and mathematics: Perceptions of preservice and practicing elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 94(2), 58- 64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1994.tb12293.x

Lehman, J., Kim, W., & Harris, C. (2014). Collaborations in a community of practice working to integrate engineering design in elementary science education. Journal of STEM Education, 15(3).

Lonning, R. A., & DeFranco, T. C. (1994). Development and implementation of an integrated mathematics/science preservice elementary methods course. School Science and Mathematics, 94(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1994.tb12284.x

Lonning, R. A., & DeFranco, T. C. (1997). Integration of science and mathematics: A theoretical model. School Science and Mathematics, 97(4), 212-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17369.x

Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Sage Publication.

Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: country comparisons: international comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Final report.

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2

Masters, G. (2016). Policy insights: Five challenges in Australian school education. Australian Council for Educational Research.

McComas, W. F. (1993). STS education and the affective domain. What Research Says to the Science Teacher, 7, 161-168.

Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1069

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. The National Academies Press.

Neale, J. (2016). Iterative categorization (IC): A systematic technique for analysing qualitative data. Addiction, 111(6), 1096-1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13314

Pang, J., & Good, R. (2000). A review of the integration of science and mathematics: Implications for further research. School Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17239.x

Penprase, B. (2020). STEM education for 21st century. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41633-1

Prinsley, R., & Baranyai, K. (2015). STEM-trained and job-ready. Office of the Chief Scientist, 12, 1-4.

Pyke, C. L., & Lynch, S. (2005). Mathematics and science teachers' preparation for National Board of Professional Teaching Standards certification. School Science and Mathematics, 105(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18033.x

Ríordáin, M. N., Johnston, J., & Walshe, G. (2016). Making mathematics and science integration happen: Key aspects of practice. International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 47(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2015.1078001

Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd Ed.). SAGE Publications.

Shaughnessy, J. M. (2013). Mathematics in a STEM context. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle school, 18(6), 324-324. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.18.6.0324

STEM Task Force Report. (2014). Innovate: A blueprint for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in California public education. Californians Dedicated to Education Foundation.

Stevens, C., & Wenner, G. (1996). Elementary pre-service teachers’ knowledge and beliefs regarding science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10204.x

Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2(1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stuessy, C. L. (1995). Invited comments: A model for preservice teacher preparation that integrates the teaching and learning of mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics, 94(1), 30-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1994.tb12286.x

Treacy, P., & O’Donoghue, J. (2013). Authentic integration: A model for integrating mathematics and science in the classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2013.868543

Underbill, R. G. (1995). Integrating math and science: We need dialogue! School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 225-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15770.x

Utley, J., Moseley, C., & Bryant, R. (2005). Relationship between science and mathematics teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(2), 82-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18040.x

Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. Simon & Schuster.

West, S. S., Vasquez-Mireles, S., & Coker, C. (2006). Mathematics and/or science education: Separate or integrate. Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 11-18.

Wicklein, R. C., & Schell, J. W. (1995). Case studies of multidisciplinary approaches to integrating mathematics, science and technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 6(2), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v6i2.a.5


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493