Mathematics Learners’ Perceptions of Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning during the COVID-19 Lockdown in a Disadvantaged Context
Abstract
The COVID-19 global pandemic’s impact on education will take years to resolve. At this point, it is sensible to ponder the big questions of mathematics teaching and learning in disadvantaged contexts. This descriptive mixed-methods study is focused on the learners’ perceptions of the Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning (ERTL) of mathematics during the COVID-19 lockdown. The study was conducted with 137 learners at public secondary schools in a disadvantaged context in South Africa. Purposive and stratified random sampling techniques were used to select the respondents. The data was collected through a Google-generated semi-structured questionnaire. Content analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data from the open-response items. The quantitative data was analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. The findings were that most learners in resource-constrained contexts neither enjoyed nor benefitted from the ERTL of mathematics and preferred face-to-face classroom interactions with the teachers. Many learners stated that they were used to seeing the teachers’ gestures, body language, and facial expressions. Most learners indicated that it was challenging not to work in groups when solving mathematics problems and that they could not learn mathematics productively at home. Further findings were that the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted learners in disadvantaged contexts since they did not have adequate digital resources and internet connectivity to learn mathematics remotely. The COVID-19 pandemic will end one day. Studying the learners’ perceptions of the ERTL assists in the creation of programmes that can enhance digital mathematics teaching and learning in disadvantaged contexts.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.11
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ackoff, R. L. (1953). The Design of Social Research. University of Chicago Press.
Alibali, M., Nathan, M., Wolfgram, M., Church, R., Jacobs, S., Johnson Martinez, C., & Knuth, E. (2014). How teachers link ideas in mathematics instruction using speech and gesture: A corpus analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 32(1), 65–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.858161
Amnesty International. (2020). Broken and Unequal: The State of Education in South Africa. Amnesty International Ltd.
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis & E. Simmit (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3–14). CMESG/GDEDM.
Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 217–231. https://doi.org/10.28945/2051
Busto, S., Dumbser, M., & Gaburro, E. (2021). A Simple but Efficient Concept of Blended Teaching of Mathematics for Engineering Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(4), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020056
Cauchemez, S., Ferguson, N. M., Wachtel, C., Tegnell, A., Saour, G., Duncan, B., & Nicoll, A. (2009). Closure of schools during an influenza pandemic. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 9(8), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016S1473-3099(09)70176-8
Chirinda, B., Ndlovu, M., & Spangenberg, E. (2021). Teaching Mathematics during the COVID-19 Lockdown in a Context of Historical Disadvantage. Education Sciences, 11(4), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040177
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Dube, B. (2020). Rural Online Learning in the Context of COVID-19 in South Africa: Evoking an Inclusive Education Approach. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 135-157. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2020.5607
Earn, D. J. D. (2012). Effects of School Closure on Incidence of Pandemic Influenza in Alberta, Canada. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156(3), 173. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-3-201202070-00005
Gall, M. D., Gall J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning.
Hrastinski, S., Edman, A., Andersson, F., Kawnine, T., & Soames, C. A. (2014). Informal math coaching by instant messaging: Two case studies of how university students coach K-12 students. Interactive Learning Environments, 22, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.641682
Khirwadkar, A., Khan, S. I., Mgombelo, J., Obradovi?- Ratkovi?, S., & Forbes, W. A. (2020). Reimagining Mathematics Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Brock Education Journal 29(2), 42-6. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v29i2.839
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. National Academy Press.
Koskey, K. L. K., Cain, B., Sondergeld, T. A., Alvim, H. G., & Slager, E. M. (2015). A mixed-methods investigation of factors and scenarios influencing college students’ decision to complete surveys at five mid-western universities. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 27(1).
Lu, J., & Churchill, D. (2014). The effect of social interaction on learning engagement in a social networking environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 22, 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.680966
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher. S. (2014). Research in education: evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson.
Mertens, D. M. (2015). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Mhlanga, D., & Moloi, T. (2020). COVID-19 and the Digital Transformation of Education: What Are We Learning on 4IR in South Africa? Education Sciences, 10(7), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070180
Mulenga, E. M., & Marbán, J. M. (2020). Is COVID-19 the Gateway for Digital Learning in Mathematics Education? Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), 269. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/7949
Murat, M. & Bonacini, L. (2020). Coronavirus pandemic, remote learning and education inequalities. GLO Discussion Paper, No. 679, Global Labor Organization (GLO), Essen.
Ndlovu, M. & Mostert, I. (2018). Teacher perceptions of Moodle and throughput in a blended learning in-service programme for secondary mathematics. Africa Education Review, 15(2), 131-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1241667
Plano Clark, V., &. Ivankova, N. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Sage.
Spaull, N. (2019). Equity: A Price Too High to Pay? In N. Spaull & J. Jansen (Eds), South African Schooling: The enigma of inequality (pp. 1-19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18811-5_1
Statistics South Africa. (2019). Inequality Trends in South Africa: A multidimensional diagnostic of inequality. Statistics South Africa.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Unesco. (2020). Covid-19 education response. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/globalcoalition
Züll, C. (2016). Open-Ended Questions. GESIS Survey Guidelines. Mannheim, Germany: GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493