Educators’ Motivation and Intention within the UTAUT Model to Adopt the Flipped Classroom: A Scoping Review
Abstract
There is a growing concern for educational institutions to transform and innovate their teaching and learning pedagogy to meet today's demands. This phenomenon is reflected in the rise of the flipped or inverted classroom. However, the motivation and intention of educators to transform from conventional teaching to flipped classrooms is poorly understood. Therefore, a scoping review of the literature was undertaken to identify important determinants in educators’ motivation and intention within the UTAUT model to use the flipped classroom. Databases searched included the Web of Science, Scopus, and ERIC databases. Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage framework was utilized as the method for the scoping review process. The findings reveal four main themes and twelve sub-themes regarding educators’ motivation and intention to implement the flipped classroom, of which social factors are the most dominant determinants. By examining the crucial determinants that influence the motivation and intention of adopting flipped classrooms, this study might assist educators in successfully making the change.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.2.16
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abd Rahman, S. F., Md Yunus, M., & Hashim, H. (2021). Applying UTAUT in Predicting ESL Lecturers Intention to Use Flipped Learning. Sustainability, 13(15), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158571
Abdekhoda, M., Maserat, E., & Ranjbaran, F. (2019). A conceptual model of flipped classroom adoption in medical higher education. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(4), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2019-0058
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Ciffs: NJ: Prentice Hall.
Akçay?r, G., & Akçay?r, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126(2018), 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
Aljarrah, A., Thomas, M.K., & Shehab, M. (2018). Investigating temporal access in a flipped classroom: procrastination persists. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0083-9
Al-Shabibi, T.S., & Al-Ayasra, M.A.K. (2019). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom strategy in learning outcomes (Bibliometric Study). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(3), 96–127. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.3.6
Anderson, S., Allen, P., Peckham, S., & Goodwin, N. (2008). Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organization and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-6-7
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Arpaci, I., & Basol, G. (2020). The impact of pre-service teachers’ cognitive and technological perceptions on their continuous intention to use flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2020), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10104-8
Bakheet, E., & Gravell, A. (2020). Investigating factors based on an extended UTAUT Model to confirm Computer Science instructors’ behavioural intention to adopt the flipped classroom. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(10), 736–743. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.10.1451
Bani-Hamad, A.M.H., Alzubaidi, R.S.M. (2021). The effectiveness of fermi problem solving with flipped learning techniques in teaching Physics on improving critical thinking skills among Emirati secondary students. Review of International Geographical Education(RIGEO), 11(8), 2730–2743. https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo. 11.08.254
Basri M., Sumargono, & Fadli F, F. (2021). The Effect of Using the Powtoon Application on Student Learning Motivation. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 11(5), 4018–4024. https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo.11.05.283
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: Internal Society for Technology in Education.
Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computer and Education, 115(2017), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014
Carlsson, C., Carlsson, J., Hyvonen, K., Puhakainen, J., & Walden, P. (2006, 4 January). Adoption of mobile devices/services-searching for answers with the UTAUT. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS’06), Washington, DC, USA.
Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Flipped classroom as a reform-oriented approach to teaching mathematics. ZDM, 52(7), 1291–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01191-5
Chan, S.Y., Lam, Y.K., & Ng T.F. (2020). Students’ perception on initial experience of flipped classroom in pharmacy education: Are we ready? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1541189
Chellapan, L., van der Meer, J., Pratt, K., & Wass, R. (2018). To flip or not to flip, that’s the question: Findings from an exploratory study into factors that may influence tertiary teachers to consider a flipped classroom model. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 22(1), 6–21.
Cheng, D., Liu, G., Song, Y.-F., & Qian, C. (2008, 12–14 October). Adoption of internet banking: an integrated model. Paper presented at the 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, Dalian, China. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
Dakduk, S., Santalla-Banderali, Z., & van der Woude, D. (2018). Acceptance of blended learning in executive education. Sage Open, 8(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018800647
Dogusoy, B. (2020). Learning to Create Educational Digital Stories: Pre-School Prospective Teachers’ Flipped Classroom Experiences. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 49(2), 969-994. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.673092
Durak, H.Y. (2019). Examining the acceptance and use of online social networks by preservice teachers within the context of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(1), 173–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9200-6
Elmaadaway, M.A. (2017).The effect of flipped classroom approach on class engagement and skill performance in a blackboard course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12553
Escobedo, F., Cjuno, J., & Hernández, R.M. (2020). Organizational climate and teacher satisfaction in the MyPes of the tumbes education sector. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(6), 582–589.
Fuchs, K. (2021). Innovative Teaching: A Qualitative Review of Flipped Classrooms. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(3), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.3.2
Ghufron, M.A., & Nurdianingsih, F. (2021). Flipped classroom method with Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) in EFL writing class. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(1), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.1.7
Gómez-Carrasco, C. J., Monteagudo-Fernández, J., Moreno-Vera, J. R., & Sainz-Gómez, M. (2020). Evaluation of a gamification and flipped-classroom program used in teacher training: Perception of learning and outcome. PloS One, 15(7), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
Green, R.D., & Schlairat, M.C. (2017). Moving toward heutagogical learning: illuminating undergraduate nursing student experiences in a flipped classroom. Nurse Education Today, 49(2017), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.016
Gunasinghe, A., & Nanayakkara, S. (2021). Role of technology anxiety within UTAUT in understanding non-user adoption intentions to virtual learning environments: the state university lecturers’ perspective. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(3), 284–308. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2021.10036681
Hazaymeh, W.A., & Altakhaineh, A.R., (2019). the effect of flipped classroom instruction on developing Emirati EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(10), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.10.6
Hodgkinson, G.P., & Ford, J. K. (2014). Narrative, meta-analytic, and systematic reviews: What are the differences and why do they matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S1–S5. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1918
Hoshang, S., Hilal, T.A., & Hilal, H. A. (2021). Investigating the acceptance of flipped classroom and suggested recommendations. Procedia Computer Science, 184(2021), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.052
Kassop, M. (2003). Ten ways online education matches, or surpasses, face-to-face learning.
a. http://technologysource.org/article/ten_ways_online_education_matches_or_surpasses_facetoface_learning/%20.
Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T.T. (2010). Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 533–541.
Khan, M.S.H., & Abdou, B.O. (2021). Flipped classroom: How higher education institutions (HEIs) of Bangladesh could move forward during COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100187
Kiang, N.H., & Yunus, M.M. (2021). What do Malaysian ESL Teachers Think About Flipped Classroom?. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(3), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.3.10
Killian, C.M., Woods, A.M., Graber, K.C., & Templin, T.J. (2020). Factors associated with high school physical education teachers’ adoption of a supplemental online instructional system (iPE). Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2019-0188
Kim E.J. (2021). The effect of social presence, loyalty, and group polarisation on online learning motivation in Moodle-based online learning. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 11(8), 566–580. https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo.11.08.52
Kim, N.H., So, H.-J., & Joo, Y.J. (2021). Flipped learning design fidelity, self-regulated learning, satisfaction, and continuance intention in a university flipped learning course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6046
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4
Lee, J., Lim, C., & Kim, H. (2017). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Education Tech Research Dev, 65(2017), 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1
Lento, C. (2016). Promoting active learning in introductory financial accounting through the flipped class design. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 8(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2015-0005
Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2019). Investigating the factors that influence higher education instructors’ decisions to adopt a flipped classroom instructional model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 2028–2039. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12703
Maldonado, U.P.T., Khan, G.F., Moon, J., & Rho, J.J. (2009, 24-26 November). E-learning motivation, students’ acceptance/use of educational portal in developing countries: a case study of Peru. Paper presented at the 2009 Fourth International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology, Seoul, Korea (South).
Mohammadjani, F., & Tonkaboni, F. (2015). A Comparison between the Effect of Cooperative Learning Teaching Method and Lecture Teaching Method on Students’ Learning and Satisfaction Level. International Education Studies, 8(9), 107–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n9p107
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., . . . Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Nir, A.E., & Bogler, R. (2008). The antecedents of teacher satisfaction with professional development programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.03.002
O’Brien, K., Wilkins, A., Zack, E., & Solomon, P. (2010). Scoping the field: identifying key research priorities in HIV and rehabilitation. AIDS and Behavior, 14(2), 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9528-z
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25(2015), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
Peterson, J., Pearce, P.F., Ferguson, L.A., & Langford, C.A. (2016). Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 29(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12380
Petrosino, A., Boruch, R.F., Soydan, H., Duggan, L., & Sanchez-Meca, J. (2001). Meeting the challenges of evidence-based policy: The Campbell Collaboration. The ANNALS of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620157800102
Radovan, M., & Kristl, N. (2017). Acceptance of Technology and Its Impact on Teachers’ Activities in Virtual Classroom: Integrating UTAUT and CoI into a Combined Model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(3), 11–22.
Ramdan M.R., Abdullah N.L., Mat Isa R., & Hanafiah M.H. 2021. Organizational ambidexterity within supply chain management: a scoping review. LogForum, 17 (4), 531–546. http://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2021.618
Sánchez-Gómez, M.C., Martín-García, A.V., & Mena, J. (2020). Blended learning in tertiary education: teachers’ beliefs according to the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Learning Technology, 15(4), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2020.113883
Schreiber, L.M., & Valle, B.E. (2013). Social constructivist teaching strategies in the small group classroom. Small Group Research, 44(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413488422
Seaboyer, J. (2013, 28–30 October ). The role of technology-assisted assessment in fostering critical reading in undergraduate literary studies. Paper presented at the International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, Southampton, UK.
Sergis, S., Sampson, D.G., & Pelliccione, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of flipped classroom on students learning experiences: a self-determination theory approach. Computers in Human Behaviour, 7(2018), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.011
Sun, Y., & Gao, F. (2019). Exploring the roles of school leaders and teachers in a school?wide adoption of flipped classroom: School dynamics and institutional cultures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1241–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12769
Surianti, M. (2020). Development of Accounting curriculum model based on industrial revolution approach. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 11(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.7176/RJFA/11-2-12
Tang, T., Abuhmaid, A.M., Olaimat, M., Oudat, D.M., Aldhaeebi, M., & Bamanger, E. (2020). Efficiency of flipped classroom with online-based teaching under COVID-19. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(2020), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817761
Thai, N. T., Wever, B. D., Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: looking for the best’ blend’ of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers and Education, 107(2017), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
Tune, J. D., Sturek, M., & Basile, D. P. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate students performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(2013), 316–320. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00091.2013.
Valiathan, P. (2002). Blended learning models. Learning Circuits, 3(8), 50–59.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology:Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. United States: John Wiley & Sons.
Zain, F. M., Hanafi, E., Don, Y., Yaakob, M. F. M., & Sailin, S.N. (2019). Investigating student’s acceptance of an EDMODO content management system. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1241a
Zainuddin, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Malaysian students’ perception of flipped classroom: a case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 660–670. https://doi: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1102079
Zheng, L., Bhagat, K. K., Zhen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). The Effectiveness of the flipped classroom on students’ learning achievement and learning motivation: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 23 (1), 1–15.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493