Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratories in Teaching and Learning Biology: A Review of Literature

Celine Byukusenge, Florien Nsanganwimana, Albert Paulo Tarmo

Abstract


Scholars have debated whether virtual laboratories are educationally effective tools and if they should be continuously developed. In this paper, we comprehensively review literature about the effectiveness of virtual labs in teaching and learning biology to identify the topics often taught and the linked learning outcomes. We used Google Scholar, ERIC, and Web of Science electronic databases to access journal articles and conference proceeding papers. Through a systematic analysis, we obtained 26 articles solely related to virtual lab use in biology education. The overall findings from the reviewed literature indicated that virtual laboratories are often used on topics that seem abstract. These include cell and molecular biology topics, followed by microbiology, genetics, and other practical topics such as dissection and biotechnology. This review study revealed that virtual labs are effective as they improve students’ conceptual understanding, laboratory or practical skills, and motivation and attitudes towards biology. We recommend the use of virtual labs in teaching as a means of actively involving students in safer and more cost-effective scientific inquiry.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.1


Keywords


Biology topics; computer simulations; learning outcomes; virtual laboratories/labs

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akhigbe, J. N., & Ogufere, J. A. (2019). Effect of computer simulation instructional strategy on students’ attitude and academic achievement in genetics. KIU Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 305-315.

Akpan, J., & Strayer, J. (2010). Which comes first: The use of computer simulation of frog dissection or conventional dissection as academic exercise? Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 29(2), 113-138. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ885724

Babateen, M. H. (2011). The role of virtual laboratories in science education [Conference session]. IACSIT Press, Singapore. http://www.ipcsit.com/vol12/19-ICDLE2011E10013.pdf

Borgerding, L. A., Sadler, T. D., & Koroly, M. J. (2013). Teachers’ concerns about biotechnology education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 133 147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9382-z

Borgman, C. L., Abelson, H., Dirks, L., Johnson, R., Koedinger, K., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/32t8b4bt

Boulay, R., Parisky, A., & Campbell, C. (2010, June). Developing teachers’ understanding of molecular biology: Building a foundation for students [Conference session]. ASCILITE 2010 – The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Sydney. https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/sydney10/procs/Boulay-full.pdf

Breakey, K. M., Levin, D., Miller, I., & Hentges, K. E. (2008). The use of scenario-based-learning interactive software to create custom virtual laboratory scenarios for teaching genetics. Genetics, 179(3), 1151-1155. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.090381

Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 87, 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003

Cavanagh, H., Hood, J., & Wilkinson, J. (2005). Riverina High School students’ views of biotechnology. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 8(2), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.2225/vol8-issue2-fulltext-1

Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61-71. https://academicjournals.org/article/article1379665422_Cimer.pdf

Collier, L., Dunham, S., Braun, M. W., & O’Loughlin, V. D. (2012). Optical versus virtual: Teaching assistant perceptions of the use of virtual microscopy in an undergraduate human anatomy course. Anatomical Sciences Education, 5(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.262

Cross, T. R., & Cross, V. E. (2004). Scalpel or mouse? A statistical comparison of real & virtual frog dissections. The American Biology Teacher, 66(6), 409-411. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2004)066[0409:somasc]2.0.co;2

Dakhi, O., Jama, J., Irfan, D, Ambiyar, & Ishak. (2020). Blended learning: A 21st century learning model at college. International Journal of Multi Science, 1(7), 50-65. https://multisciencejournal.com/index.php/ijm/article/view/92/72

De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z.C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305-309. https://doi.org/10.1126/Science 1230579

Diwakar, S., Achutan, K., Nedugali, P., & Nair, B. (2011). Enhanced facilitation of biotechnlogy education in developing nations via virtual labs: Analysis, implementation and case studies. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijcte.2011.v3.275

Dyrberg, N. R., Treusch, A. H., & Wiegand, C. (2017). Virtual laboratories in science education: Students’ motivation and experiences in two tertiary biology courses. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 358-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1257498

Elangovan, T., & Ismail, Z. (2014). The effects of 3D computer simulation on biology students’ achievement and memory retention. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 15(2), 1-25. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v15_issue2_files/elangovan.pdf

Evans, C., Gibbons, N. J., Shah, K., & Griffin, D. K. (2004). Virtual learning in the biological sciences: Pitfalls of simply “putting notes on the web”. Computers and Education, 43(1 2), 49 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.004

Fisher, A., Sekera, E., Payne, J., & Craig, P. (2012). Simulation of two dimensional electrophoresis and tandem mass spectrometry for teaching proteomics. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 40(6), 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20651

Flick, L., & Bell, R. (2000). Preparing tomorrow’s science teachers to use technology: Guidelines for science educators. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(1), 39-60. https://citejournal.org/volume-1/issue-1-00/science/preparing-tomorrows-science-teachers-to-use-technology-guidelines-for-science-educators

Flowers, L. O. (2011). Investigating the effectiveness of virtual laboratories in an undergraduate biology course. Journal of Human Resources & Adult Learning, 7(2), 110 116. http://www.hraljournal.com/Page/12%20Lawrence%20O.%20Flowers-1.pdf

Gallagher, A. G., Ritter, E. M., Champion, H., Higgins, G., Fried, M. P., Moses, G., Smith, C. D., & Satava, R. M. (2005). Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: Proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Annals of Surgery, 241(2), 364-372. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000151982.85062.80

Griffin, J. D. (2003). Technology in the teaching of neuroscience: Enhanced student learning. American Journal of Physiology – Advances in Physiology Education, 27(1-4), 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00059.2002

Havlícková, V., Šorgo, A., & Bílek, M. (2018). Can virtual dissection replace traditional hands-on dissection in school biology laboratory work? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1415-1429. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83679

Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: The state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2l), 105-107. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90003A

Huppert, J., Lomask, S. M., & Lazarowitz, R. (2002). Computer simulations in the high school: Students’ cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 803 821. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049150

Ismail, I., Permanasari, A., & Setiawan, W. (2016). STEM virtual lab: An alternative practical media to enhance student’s scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 239-246. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/article/view/5492/5457

Johnstone, A. H., & Al-Shuaili, A. (2001). Conversion of bench demonstration using the overhead projector/Conversión de demostraciones en el aula utilizando retroproyector. Journal of Science Education, 2(2), 78-80. https://www.proquest.com/openview/0051fa7d17702e76f72edcb34c0eab0c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=28899

Jones, S. M., * Edwards, A. (2010). Online pre-laboratory exercises enhance student preparedness for first year biology practical classes. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 18(2), 1-9.

Keller, H., & Keller, E. (2005). Making real virtual labs. The Science Education Review, 4(1), 2 11. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1049733.pdf

Kiboss, J., Wekesa, E., & Ndirangu, M. (2006). Improving students’ understanding and perception of cell theory in school biology using a computer-based instruction simulation program. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(4), 397 410. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ742381

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193 212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6

Krist, A. C., & Showsh, S. A. (2007). Experimental evolution of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. The American Biology Teacher, 69(2), 94-97. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[94:EEOARI]2.0.CO;2

Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 7-es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1132960.1132961

Makransky, G., Mayer, R. E., Veitch, N., Hood, M., Christensen, K. B., & Gadegaard, H. (2019). Equivalence of using a desktop virtual reality science simulation at home and in class. PLoS ONE, 14(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214944

Makransky, G., Thisgaard, M. W., & Gadegaard, H. (2016). Virtual simulations as preparation for lab exercises: Assessing learning of key laboratory skills in microbiology and improvement of essential non-cognitive skills. PLoS ONE, 11(6), 1 11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155895

Maldarelli, G. A., Hartmann, E. M., Cummings, P. J., Horner, R. D., Obom, K. M., Shingles, R., & Pearlman, R. S. (2009). Virtual lab demonstrations improve students’ mastery of basic biology laboratory techniques. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 10(1), 51-57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v10.99

Marbach-Ad, G., Rotbain, Y., & Stavy, R. (2008). Using computer animation and illustration activities to improve high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 273 292. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20222

Marchevsky, A. M., Relan, A., & Baillie, S. (2003). Self-instructional “virtual pathology” laboratories using web-based technology enhance medical school teaching of pathology. Human Pathology, 34(5), 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(03)00089-3

Meir, E., Perry, J., Stal, D., Maruca, S., & Klopfer, E. (2005). How effective are simulated molecular-level experiments for teaching diffusion and osmosis? Cell Biology Education, 4(3), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04-09-0049

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., & Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9), 889-896. https://doi.org/10.3736/jcim20090918

Muhamad, M., Zaman, H. B., & Ahmad, A. (2010). Virtual laboratory for learning biology: A preliminary investigation. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 71, 572-575.

Muhamad, M., Zaman, H. B., & Ahmad, A. (2012). Virtual biology laboratory (VLab-Bio): Scenario-based learning approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 162 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.395

Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open?response instrument, and an oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1131-1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20251

Olympiou, G., Zacharias, Z., & DeJong, T. (2013). Making the invisible visible: Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation. Instructional Science, 41(3), 575 596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9245-2

Oser, R., & Fraser, B. J. (2015). Effectiveness of virtual laboratories in terms of learning environment, attitudes and achievement among high-school genetics students. Curriculum and Teaching, 30(2), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/30.2.05

Ouyang, J. R., & Stanley, N. (2014). Theories and research in educational technology and distance learning instruction through Blackboard. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020208

Öztap, H., Özay, E., & Öztap, F. (2003). Turkish teachers teaching cell division to secondary school students : An investigation of difficulties experienced by Turkish teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 13-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655890

Pearson, C., & Kudzai, C. (2015). Virtual laboratories: A solution for tertiary science education in Botswana? European Journal of Logistics, Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 3(1), 12-24. https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Virtual-laboratories.pdf

Plunkett, A. D., & Yampolsky, L. Y. (2010). When a fly has to fly to reproduce: Selection against conditional recessive lethals in Drosophila. The American Biology Teacher, 72(1), 12-15. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2010.72.1.4

Poga?nik, L., & Cigi?, B. (2006). How to motivate students to study before they enter the lab. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(7), 1094-1098. https://doi.org10.1021/ed083p1094

Pope, D. S., Rounds, C. M., & Clarke-Midura, J. (2017). Testing the effectiveness of two natural selection simulations in the context of a large-enrollment undergraduate laboratory class. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 10(1), 1 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-017-0067-1

Radhamani, R., Sasidharakurup, H., Sujatha, G., Nair, B., Achuthan, K., & Diwakar, S. (2014). Virtual labs improve student’s performance in a classroom. E-Learning, E Education, and Online Training, 138, 138-146. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13293-8_17

Ray, S., Koshy, N. R., Reddy, P. J., & Srivastava, S. (2012). Virtual labs in proteomics: New e-learning tools. Journal of Proteomics, 75(9), 2515 2525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2012.03.014

Sammet, R., & Dreesmann, D. (2017). What do secondary students really learn during investigations with living animals? Parameters for effective learning with social insects. Journal of Biological Education, 51(1), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1150873

Scheckler, R. K. (2003). Virtual labs: A substitute for traditional labs? International Journal of Developmental Biology, 47(2-3), 231 236.

Shelden, E. A., Offerdahl, E. G., & Johnson, G. T. (2019). A virtual laboratory on cell division using a publicly-available image database. CourseSource. https://doi.org/10.24918/cs.2019.15

Sivin, J. P., Bialo, E., & Langford, J. (2000). 2000 research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools (7th ed.). Software and Information Industry Association.

Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337-1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.60518

Špernjak, A., & Šorgo, A. (2018). Differences in acquired knowledge and attitudes achieved with traditional, computer-supported and virtual laboratory biology laboratory exercises. Journal of Biological Education, 52(2), 206 220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1298532

Stuckey-Mickell, T. A., & Stuckey-Danner, B. D. (2007). Virtual labs in the online biology course: Student perceptions of effectiveness and usability. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 105-111. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol3no2/stuckey.pdf

Tan, S., & Waugh, R. (2013). Use of virtual-reality in teaching and learning molecular biology. In Y. Cai (Ed.), 3D immersive and interactive learning (pp. 17 43). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-90-6_2

Tarbutton, T. (2018). Leveraging 21st century learning & technology to create caring diverse classroom cultures. Multicultural Education, 25(2), 4-6.

Tibell, L. A. E., & Rundgren, C.-J. (2009). Educational challenges of molecular life science: Characteristics and implications for education and research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-09-0055

Toth, E., Morrow, B. L., & Ludvico, L. R. (2009). Designing blended inquiry learning in a laboratory context: A study of incorporating hands-on and virtual laboratories. Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), 333-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9087-7

Triola, M. M., & Holloway, W. J. (2011). Enhanced virtual microscopy for collaborative education. BMC Medical Education, 11(1), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-4

Udin, W. N., Ramli, M., & Muzzazinah. (2020). Virtual laboratory for enhancing students’ understanding on abstract biology concepts and laboratory skills: A systematic review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4), 042025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042025

Vijapurkar, J., Kawalkar, A., & Nambiar, P. (2014). What do cells really look like? An inquiry into students’ difficulties in visualising a 3-D biological cell and lessons for pedagogy. Research in Science Education, 44(2), 307-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9379-5

White, B., Bolker, E., Koolar, N., Ma, W., Maw, N. N., & Yu, C. Y. (2007). The virtual genetics lab: A freely available open-source genetics simulation. The American Biology Teacher, 69(1), 29-32.

Whitworth, K., Leupen, S., Rakes, C., & Bustos, M. (2018). Interactive computer simulations as pedagogical tools in biology labs. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), ar46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-09-0208


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493