Pre-Service Teachers' Perspectives towards the Use of GammaTutor in Teaching Physical Sciences in South African Secondary Schools

Sakyiwaa Boateng, Jogymol Kalariparampil Alex, Folake Modupe Adelabu, Thamsanqa Sihele, Vuyokazi Momoti

Abstract


This paper reports on introducing a techno-blended model for science teaching in South African senior secondary schools. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework was used as a lens for the interpretation of pre-service science teachers' use of the GammaTutor tool in the classroom for collaboration and creativity. The study employed an interpretivist multi-case design that purposefully sampled ten pre-service science teachers. Data were collected through non-participatory classroom observation and interviews. Data were then analysed qualitatively using deductive approaches with a modified version of TPACK as an analytical framework. The study found that pre-service science teachers were enthusiastic about using the GammaTutor tool because they believed it engaged their learners in the teaching-learning process and facilitated the assessment of tasks. The pre-service teachers felt that the GammaTutor tool enhanced their instruction by expanding their access to teaching-learning resources and personalising instruction. Additionally, the pre-service teachers discussed their concerns, particularly in assisting underperforming learners and effectively utilizing inquiry-based instruction using the GammaTutor tool. Notwithstanding certain apparent drawbacks, the study contributes to our understanding of how the TPACK concept might be employed as a framework for analysis in a particular situation. More crucially, teaching and learning are founded on the thorough integration of technological tools in day-to-day classroom activities.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.18


Keywords


GammaTutor tool, pre-service, science teachers, secondary schools, techno-blended tool, TPACK

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abboud, M., & Rogalski, J. (2017, February 1-5). Real uses of ICT in classrooms: Tensions and disturbances in mathematics teachers’ activity. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.). (2017). Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME10), Dublin, Ireland: DCU Institute of Education and ERME.

Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. (2011). ICT use in the teaching of mathematics: Implications for professional development of pre-service teachers in Ghana. Education and Information Technologies, 16(4), 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-010-9141-9

Al-Balushi, S.M., & Al-Hajri, S.H. (2014). Associating animations with concrete models to enhance students’ comprehension of different visual representations in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00074E

Anderson, J., & Barnett, M. (2011). Using video games to support pre-service elementary teachers learning of basic physics principles. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(4), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.10007/s10956-010-9257-0

Aslan, S. (2017). The effect of learning by teaching on pre-service science teachers’ attitudes towards chemistry. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10201a

Baidoo, M., Ameyaw, Y., & Annan, J. N. (2022). Efficacy of Padlet instructional tool on students’ engagement and perception in the teaching and learning of some ecological concept. International Journal of Sciences, 11(04), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.18483/ijSci.2554

Bekele, T. A. (2021). COVID-19 and prospect of online learning in higher education in Africa. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 13(5), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v13i5.4060

Bingimlas, K. A. (2017). Learning and teaching with Web 2.0 applications in Saudi K-12 schools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 16(3), 100-115.

Boateng, S.D. (2020) Exploring students’ academic achievements in electricity and magnetism through learning styles and learning style-based instructional strategies in Mthatha High Schools [Doctoral dissertation]. University of the Witwatersrand.

Chao, J., Chiu, J. L., DeJaegher, C. J., & Pan, E. A. (2016). Sensor augmented virtual labs: Using physical interactions with science simulations to promote understanding of gas behaviour. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9574-4

Chien, Y. T., Chang, C. Y., Yeh, T. K., & Chang, K. E. (2012). Engaging pre-service science teachers to act as active designers of technology integration: A MAGDAIRE framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 578-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.12.005

Coomeyras, M. (2000, February 13). Promoting a culture in reading. The Comet.

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2009). Ubiquitous learning. University of Illinois Press.

Czernjewicz, L., Ravjee, N., & Mlitwa, N. (2004). Information and communication technologies (ICTs) and South African higher education: Understanding/s (of) the landscape. Growth, 3, 4.

Dalal, M., Archambault, L., & Shelton, C. (2017). Professional development for international teachers: Examining TPACK and technology integration decision making. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3-4), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1314780

Dietrich, L. (2018). Unpack TPACK in your classroom. In P. Mishra (Ed.). (2018). Revised version of TPACK image. https://punyamishra.com/2018/09/10/the-tpack-diagram-gets-an-upgrade/

Engineering News. (2020). A South African university has developed a teaching method that improves maths and science marks in SA schools. Creamer Media’s Engineering News. https://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/a-south-african-university-has-developed-a-teaching-method-that-improves-maths-and-science-marks-in-sa-schools-2020-01-20

Fernandes, G. W. R., Rodrigues, A. M., & Ferreira, C. A. (2020). Professional development and use of digital technologies by science teachers: A review of theoretical frameworks. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 673-708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9707-x

Finger, G., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Grimbeek, P. (2013, November 29-December 01). Teaching teachers for the future project: Building TPACK confidence and capabilities for e-learning. International Conference on Educational Technologies, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259010722_TEACHING_TEACHERS_FOR_THE_FUTURE_PROJECT_BUILDING_TPACK_CONFIDENCE_AND_CAPABILITIES_FOR_ELEARNING

Gershon, I. (2017). Language and the newness of media. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46, 15–31. https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041300

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191.

Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2018). The race between education and technology. In D. Grusky & J. Hill (Eds.), Inequality in the 21st century (pp. 49-54). Routledge.

Hochberg, K., Kuhn, J., & Müller, A. (2018). Using smartphones as experimental tools—effects on interest, curiosity, and learning in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 385-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9731-7

Jarosievitz, B. (2017, March 16-17). Modern physics teaching resources and activities. Conference proceedings: New perspectives in science education (6th ed). Florence, Italy. https://www.academia.edu/32410101/Conference_Proceedings_New_Perspectives_in_Science_Education

Jerrim, J. (2018). A digital divide? Randomised evidence on the impact of computer-based assessment in PISA. CfEE Research Brief. London: Centre for Education Economics. https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/library/a-digital-divide-randomised-evidence-on-the-impact-of-computer-based-assessment-in-pisa

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE Publishing.

Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing pre-service teachers' intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59.

Joshi, D. R. (2017). Influence of ICT in mathematics teaching. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, 3(1), 7-11.

Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19.

Koopman, O., Van Wyk, M., & Koopman, K. (2020). Science teachers’ views and applications of technology-based teaching. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/cgp/v13i03/25-42.

Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. London: SAGE Publishing.

Lim, C. P., & Hang, D. (2003). An activity theory approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools. Computers & Education, 41(1), 49-63.

Luft, J. A., Dubois, S. L., Nixon, R. S., & Campbell, B. K. (2015). Supporting newly hired teachers of science: Attaining teacher professional standards. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 1-48.

Martin, B. (2018). Faculty technology beliefs and practices in teacher preparation through a TPACK lens. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 1775-1788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9680-4.

McGraw-Hill. (2019). What is TPACK theory and how can it be use in the classroom. www.mheducation.ca/blog/what-is-tpack-theory-and-how-can-it-be-used-in-the-classroom.

Mosiane, T. M. (2019, October 21-25). Tablet TouchTutor®: A 21st-century offline tool to enhance the self-directed learning of FET mathematics learners. ISTE International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Kruger National Park, Mpumalanga, South Africa https://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/26168?show=full

Ogegbo, A. A., & Ramnarain, U. (2022). Teaching and learning Physics using interactive simulation: A guided inquiry practice. South African Journal of Education, 42(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42n1a1997.

Orhun, N. (2012). The relationship between learning styles and achievement in calculus course for engineering students. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 47, 638-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.710.

Pima, J. (2019). Factors that motivate teachers to use ICT in teaching: A case of Kaliua District secondary schools in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 15(1).

Pineida, F. O. (2011). Competencies for the 21st century: Integrating ICT to life, school, and economical development. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 28, 54-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.011.

Postholm, M. B. (2007). The advantages and disadvantages of using ICT as a mediating artefact in classrooms compared to alternative tools. Teachers and teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(6), 587-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600701683531.

Ramnarain, U. & Hlatswayo, M. (2018). Teacher beliefs and attitudes about inquiry-based learning in a rural school district in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1431

Reddy, V., Prinsloo, C., Arends, F., Visser, M., Winnaar, L., Feza, N., ... & Maja, M. (2012). Highlights from TIMSS 2011: The South African perspective. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/2877

Republic of South Africa. Department of Basic Education. (2018). National Senior Certificate Diagnostic Report - Part 1. Pretoria: Government Printer. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Reports/2017%20NSC%20Diagnostic%20Report%20Part%201.pdf?ver=2018-01-30-140924-883.

Republic of South Africa. Department of Basic Education. (2019). National Senior Certificate examination report. National diagnostic report. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Printer. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/Reports.

Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2015). Creative schools: Revolutionising education from the ground up. Penguin UK.

Santos, J.M., & Castro, T.D. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100110

Shulman, L. 1986. Paradigms and research programmes in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp.3-36). Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Shulman, L. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

Smith, J. J., & Greene, H. C. (2013). Pre-service teachers use e-learning technologies to enhance their learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 12(1), 121-140.

Sondlo, A., & Ramnarain, U. (2019, June 22-24). Exploring the South African Physical Sciences pre-service teachers’ pedagogical orientations. International Conference on Education and New Developments Porto, Portugal. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED604965

Sun, Y., Strobel, J., & Newby, T. J. (2017). The impact of student teaching experience on pre-service teachers’ readiness for technology integration: A mixed-methods study with growth curve modelling. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 597-629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9486-x

Sweeney, T., & Drummond, A. (2012). How prepared are our pre-service teachers to integrate technology: A pilot study. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 117-123.

Thompson A. D., & Mishra, P. (2007). Editors' remarks. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 38-64. https://doi.org.10.1080/10402454.2007.10784583

Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge. In P.L.Peterson, E.Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 656-661). Academic Press.

Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3518

Voogt, J., & McKenney, S. (2017). TPACK in teacher education: Are we preparing teachers to use technology for early literacy? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1174730

Waghid, Z., & Waghid, F. (2018). [Re] examining the role of technology in education through a deliberative decision-making approach: In the quest towards democratic education in South African schools. In African democratic citizenship education revisited (pp. 133-156). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67861-0_7

Walan, S. (2020). Embracing digital technology in science classrooms—secondary school teachers’ enacted teaching and reflections on practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09828-6

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. SAGE Publishing.

Zhang, W. X., Hsu, Y. S., Wang, C. Y., & Ho, Y. T. (2015). Exploring the impacts of cognitive and metacognitive prompting on students’ scientific inquiry practices within an e-learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 529-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.996796


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493