Assessing Satisfaction of Science School Subject Teachers and Leaders in Rwanda on the Continuous Professional Development through Online Learning

Venuste Nsengimana, Opanga David, Alphonse Uworwabayeho, Evariste Minani, Leon Mugabo, Theophile Nsengimana

Abstract


In Rwanda, social, economic, and educational activities have recently been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. After its outbreak, schools closed, and one of the alternatives opted for was online learning. This study assessed the satisfaction of school subject leaders (SSLs) and school leaders (SLs) with online learning and identified opportunities and challenges for the improvement of online learning. The study was guided by a professional development framework and design for online teaching. Data were gathered through an online survey and a Zoom meeting with 158 SSLs and 120 SLs purposively chosen from the University of Rwanda's continuous professional development (CPD). Findings indicated that the most commonly used materials are laptops and mobile phones, while the most entertaining activities include doing online quizzes and interactive discussions. Furthermore, the study revealed a high level of satisfaction with online facilitation, even though teachers still need support from facilitators. In addition, males are more motivated to continue with online learning than females. It was also revealed that both SSLs and SLs still have challenges in uploading assignments, contributing to forum discussions, and understanding the subject content. This study recommended the increase of videos, online quizzes, and face-to-face sessions to improve online learning.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.7.20


Keywords


online learning; CPD; STEM; school leadership; subject leader

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arkorful, V., &Abaidoo, N. (2014). The role of e-learning, the advantages and disadvantages of itsadoption in higher education. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 397-410. https://www.ijern.com/journal

Baran, E., & Coreira, A.P. (2014). A professional development framework for online teaching. Tech Trends, 58(5), 98-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0791-0

Blocher, J.M. (2005). Increasing learner interaction: Using Jigsaw online. Educational Media International, 42(3), 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980500161486

Buetow, S. (2010). Thematic analysis and its reconceptualization as ‘saliency analysis’. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 15(2), 123-125. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009081

Chikari, G., Rudhumbu, N., & Svotwa, D. (2015). Institutional continuous professional development as a tool for improving lecturer performance in private higher education institutes in Botswana. International Journal of Higher Education Management, 2(1), 26-39. https://doi.org/10.24052/IJHEM/21

Cleary, M., Horsfall, J., O’Hara-Aarons, M., Jackson, D., & Hunt G.E. (2011). The views of mental health nurses on continuing professional development. Journal of Clinical Nursing,20, 23-24 3561–3566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03745.x

Day, C. (1999). Professional development and reflective practice: Purposes, processes and partnerships. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 7(2), 221-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.1999.11090864

Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). Professionalism, performativity and empowerment: Discourses in the politics, policies and purposes of continuing professional development. In C. Day & J. Sachs, (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 3-33). https://vdocuments.site/

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

FikriZulfikara, A., Muhidinb, A., Pranoto, Suparta, W., Trisetyarsoa, A., Saleh Abbasa, B., &Kanga, C.H. (2019). The effectiveness of online learning with facilitation method. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 32-40. www.sciencedirect.com

Gedik, N., Kiraz, E., & Ozden, M. (2012). The optimum blend: Affordances and challenges of blended learning for students. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 102-117. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojqi/issue/21396/229377

Giannakos, M.N. (2013). Exploring the video-based learning research: A review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 191–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12070

Gorbalenya, A. E., Baker, S. C., Baric, R. S., de Groot, R. J., Drosten, C., Gulyaeva, A. A., Haagmans, B. L., & Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2009). Distance education in the digital age: Common misconceptions andchallenging tasks. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 105-122. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/627

Hardaker, G., & Singh, G. (2011). The adoption and diffusion of e-learning in UK universities: A comparative case study using Giddens’s theory of structuration. Campus Wide Information Systems, 28(4), 221-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650741111162707

Harland, J., & Kinder, K. (1997). Teachers’ continuing professional development: Framing a model of outcomes. Journal of In-Service Education, 23(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674589700200005

Hartsell,T., & Yuen, S.C.Y. (2006).Videostreaming in online learning. AACE Review, 14(1), 31-43. from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/6152/

Hindal, H., Reid, N., & Whitehead, R. (2013). Gender and learner characteristics. European Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.2.2.83

Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. EDUCAUSEReview, 31(4), 51-55. https://er.educause.edu/

Hubackova, S. (2015). History and perspectives of E-learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1187–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.594

Humanante Ramos, P. R., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Conde-González, M. Á. (2015). Personal learning environments and online classrooms: An experience with university students. IEEE RevistaIberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje (IEEE RITA), 10(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2015.2391411

Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: How teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 121–140. https://doi.org/10.28945/1968

Karamizadeh, Z., Zarifsanayei, N., Faghih, A.A., Mohammadi, H., & Habibi, M. (2012). The study of effectiveness of blended learning approach for medical training courses. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 14(1), 41-44. https://sites.kowsarpub.com/ircmj/articles/71370.html

Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2016). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4

Kotler, P. & Clarke. R. (1987). Marketing for healthcare organizations. Prentice-Hall. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(88)90083-5

Kozan, K., & Richardson, J.C. (2014). Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007

Kuhlemeier, H., & Hemker, B. (2007). The impact of computer use at home on students' internet skills. Computers & Education, 49(2), 460-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.10.004

Kvavik, R. B. (2005). Convenience, communications, and control: How students use technology. In D. Oblinger, J. L. Oblinger, & J. K. Lippincott (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp.7.1–7.20). www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/

Liu, C.C., Tao, S.Y., & Nee, J.N. (2008). Bridging the gap between students and computers: Supporting activity awareness for network collaborative learning with GSM network. Behavior& Information Technology, 27(2), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290601054772

Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Student perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023

Mcdonnell, F., &Zutshi, H. (2010). Inspiring practice: A guide to developing an integrated approach to supervision in children’s trusts. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/2938

Melchor, G. G., Soto-Varela, R., Moron-Marchena, J.A., & Pinos-Espejo, M.J. (2020). Using mobile devices for education purposes in compulsory secondary education to improve student’s learning achievements. Sustainability,12, 3724. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093724

Morstain, B.R., & Kraft, R.E. (1979). Educational orientations of college students: A typological analysis. Research in Higher Education, 10, 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976267

Mphale, L. M. (2014). The effectiveness of teachers’ professional development initiatives in enhancing teachers’growth in Botswana secondary schools education. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 7(1), 75-90. http://hdl.handle.net/10311/1233

Mpofu, B. (2016). University students of computers and mobile devices for learning and their readings speed on different platforms. University Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 926-932. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929060105477210.13189/ujer.2016.040430

Narul, I., Beer, M., & Slack, F. (2015). E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i5.947

Nghiem, L. D., Morgan, B., Donner, E., & Short, M. D. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Considerations for the waste and wastewater services sector. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 1, 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100006

O’Donoghue, J., Singh, G. & Green, C. (2004). Internet usage, challenges, and attitudes among university students: Case study of the University of Jordan. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 9, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2016.912039

Paechter, M., & Maier, B. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students’ experiences and preferences in e-learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 292-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.004

Panzavolta, S., & Laici, C. (2017). Active learning and ICT in upper secondary school: An exploratory case study on student engagement by debating. EAI Endorsed Trans on e-Learning, 4(14), e5. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.26-7-2017.152907

Renner, D., Laumer, S., & Weitzel, T. (2014). Effectiveness of blended learning – A literature review. Proceedings of the Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah. https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/20989

Rhema, A., & Miliszewska, I. (2010). Towards e-learning in higher education in Libya. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 7, 423–437. https://doi.org/10.28945/1218

Rovai, A.P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 1-16. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/96509/

Rwanda Education Board (REB). (2015). Competence based curriculum: Curriculum framework. Mineduc.

Shand, K., & GlassettFarrelly, S. (2017). Using blended teaching to teach blended learning:Lessons learned from preservice teachers in an instructional methods course. Journal of Online Learning Research, 3(1), 5–30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=1148421

Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12 students: Implications for STEM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/7893

Stol, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Sally, T. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8

Swafford, J. (1998). Teachers supporting teachers through peer coaching. In B. Moon, J., & E. Bird (Eds.), Leading professional development in education, pp.107-115.

Sweeney, J.C., & Ingram. D. (2001). A comparison of traditional and web marketing education: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475301231007

Taghizadeh, M., & Hajhosseini, F. (2020). Investigating a blended learning environment: Contribution of attitude, interaction, and quality of teaching to satisfaction of graduate students of TEFL. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00531-z

Ucan, S. (2016). The role of continuous professional development of teachers in educational change. A literature review. Harran Education Journal, 1(1), 36-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.22596/2016.0101.36.43

Ukachi Ngozi, B., &OnuohaUloma, D. (2013). Continuing professional development and innovative information service delivery in Nigerian libraries: inhibitors and the way out. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 60(4), 269–275. https://www.op.nisciar.res.in/index.php/ALIS/issue/view/13

Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Del Carmen Garrido-Arroyo, M.,Burgos-Videla, C., & Belen Morales-Cevallos, M. (2020). Trends in educational research about e-learning: A systematic literature review (2009-2018). Sustainability 12, 5153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125153

Vázquez-Cano, E. (2014). Mobile distance learning with smartphones and apps in higher education. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 1505–1520. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.4.2012

VVOB Rwanda (2015). Coaching school leadership to achieve high level learning outcomes. An outcomes evaluation report. Kigali, Rwanda.

Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers and Education, 55(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493