Attitudes of Ecuadorian Secondary School Teaching Staff towards Online STEM Development in 2022
Abstract
Ecuadorian teachers lack experience in the process of teaching and learning science, technology, engineering and mathematics online (STEML). These limitations are evident in the low grades of students in the general unified baccalaureate (GUB) and in the low application of STEM majors in Ecuador. The study aims to describe, elucidate and understand the attitudes of Ecuadorian teachers towards STEM education in GUB using a multi-method or mixed-method approach study. The design was the DEXPLIS sequential explanatory type. The questionnaire was administered to 194 participants and ten teachers who responded to a semi-structured interview. The sampling technique was non-probabilistic participatory sampling. The student's t-test and ANOVA analysis were used for quantitative data analysis and the triangulation technique for qualitative data. Results showed the lack of materials and technological support hinders online activities. Significant differences were found in the attitudes between the teaching staff of public and private institutions and between the different levels of the GUB. Statistical analyses showed that administrative support, professional support, STEML training, teaching and learning time positively influenced the attitudes of STEML teachers.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.7.4
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alangari, T. S. (2022). Online STEM education during COVID-19 period: A systematic review of perceptions in higher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(5), em2105. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11986
Altan, E. B., Ozturk, N. & Turkoglu, A. Y. (2018). Socio-scientific issues as a context for stem education: case study research with pre-service science teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.805
Arnado, A. A., Pene, A. J. P., Fuentes, C. J. F. & Astilla, K. M. (2022). Fostering sustainable STEM education: Attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs of STEM teachers in conducting laboratory activities. International Journal of Studies in Education and Science (IJSES), 3(1), 54–74.
Asgari, S., Trajkovic, J., Rahmani, M., Zhang, W., Lo, R. & Sciortino, A. (2021). An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE 16(4), e0250041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250041
Blackburn, H. & Heppler, J. (2019). Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Citation Analysis of the Current Literature. Science & Technology Libraries, 38(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2019.1645080
Bronfenbrenner, U. & Ceci, S. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101(4), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.568
Calle, R. (2022). Impact of the STEM model on learning Pascal's Principle. INNOVA Research Journal, 7(2), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v7.n2.2022.2044
Cavus, N. & Sekyere, D. (2021). A comparison of online video conference platforms: Their contributions to education during COVID-19 pandemic. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(4), 1162–1173 https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i4.6329
Cennet, G., Nagihan, T. & Nezih, Ö. (2021). Investigation of Middle School Students’ Attitudes towards Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education and Determination of the Predictors, Journal of Science Learning, 4(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i2.28859
Changtong, N., Maneejak, N. & Yasri, P. (2020). Approaches for implementing STEM (science, technology, engineering & mathematics) activities among middle school students in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(1), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.1.185
Ching, L. & Fernández, J. (2020). Analysing Dialogue in STEM Classrooms in Ecuador: A Dual Socioeconomic Context in a High School. Journal of new approaches in educational research, 9(2), 194–215. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.529
Ciftci, A., Topcu, M.S. & Erdogan, I. (2020). Gender Gap and Career Choices in STEM Education: Turkey Sample. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(3), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.248.4
Feria, H., Matilla, M. & Mantecón, S. (2019). Methodological triangulation as a method of scientific research. Notes for a conceptualization. Didasc@lia: Didáctica Y educación, 10(4), 137–146. https://revistas.ult.edu.cu/index.php/didascalia/article/view/917
Gok, T. (2021). The development of the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) attitude and motivation survey towards secondary school students. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 9(1), 105–119.
Ha, C. T., Thao, T. T. P., Trung, N. T., Huong, L. T. T., Dinh, N. V. & Trung, T. (2020). A Bibliometric Review of Research on STEM Education in ASEAN: Science Mapping the Literature in Scopus Database, 2000 to 2019. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), em1889. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8500
Hebebci, M. T., Bertiz, Y. & Alan, S. (2020). Investigation of views of students and teachers on distance education practices during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 4(4), 267–282.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C. & Baptista, L. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. [Research Methodology]. McGraw Hill.
Holmes, K., Mackenzie, E., Berger, N. & Walker, M. (2021). Linking K-12 STEM Pedagogy to Local Contexts: A Scoping Review of Benefits and Limitations. STEM Educatuion, 6. 693808. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.693808/full
Kaleva, S., Pursiainen, J., Hakola, M., Rusanen, J. & Muukkonen, H. (2019). Students’ reasons for STEM choices and the relationship of mathematics choice to university admission. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0196-x
Kara, M. (2019). A Literature Review: The Usage of Constructivism in multidisciplinary Learning Environments. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 4(1–2), 19-26. http://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.520666
Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Holland, J. D. & Han, J. (2020). Increasing high school teachers’ self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(14), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w
Kubat, U. (2018). The integration of STEM into science classes. World Journal on Educational Technology, 10(3), 165-173. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1185407.pdf
Kurniati, E., Suwono, H., Ibrohim, I., Suryadi, A. & Saefi, M. (2022). International Scientific Collaboration and Research Topics on STEM Education: A Systematic Review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4), em2095. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11903
Lam, T., Toan, Th. & Ngoc, H. (2021). Challenges to STEM education in Vietnamese high school contexts. Heliyon, 7(12), E08649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08649
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y. & Froyd, J. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 11, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
Madani, R. (2020). Teaching Challenges and Perceptions on STEM Implementation for Schools in Saudi Arabia. European Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/8468
Margot, K. C. & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Martínez, M., Viveros, M., Cejas, M. & Mendoza, D. (2019). Continuing Education of the Professors at Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial (UTE). Mediterranean Journal Of Social Sciences, 10(2), 131. http://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/10400
Mendoza, D., Córdova, I., Chávez, J., Bravo, F. & Cejas, M. (2019). The formative research of Ecuadorian university teaching staff. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 77(3), 364–378. http://oaji.net/articles/2019/457-1561382097.pdf
Ministry of Higher Education. (2018). STEM Ecuador encourages the study of science in children. Ecuador. https://www.educacionsuperior.gob.ec/stem-ecuador-incentiva-el-estudio-de-las-ciencias-en-la-ninez/
Muenks, K., Canning, E. A., LaCosse, J., Green, D. J., Zirkel, S., Garcia, J. A. & Murphy, M. C. (2020). Does My Professor Think My Ability Can Change? Students’ Perceptions of Their STEM Professors’ Mindset Beliefs Predict Their Psychological Vulnerability, Engagement, and Performance in Class. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(11), 2119–2144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000763
Mulisa, F. (2019). Application of bioecological systems theory to higher education: Best evidence review. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 1(2). 104–115.
Navarro, J., Vaquero, M., Perea, A., Pedrós, G., Aparicio, P. & Martínez, M. (2021). The Influence of Technology on Mental Well-Being of STEM Teachers at University Level: COVID-19 as a Stressor. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 9605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189605
Nurtanto, M., Pardjono, P., Widarto W. & Ramdani, S.D. (2020). The effect of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Engineering Design Product (EDP) on Automotive engineering competency in vocational high school. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 633–649. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.645047
Ponce Renova, H. F., Cervantes Arreola, D. I. & Robles Ramírez, A. J. (2021). ¿How well did authors report the Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha? Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 5(3), 2438–2462. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v5i3.463
Potgieter, A. & Potgieter, M. J. (2021). Grade Six students’ and teachers’ attitudes towards socio-constructivism in science education. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 26(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.47577/teachers’j.v26i1.5089
Ramli, N. & Awang, M. (2020). Critical Factors that Contribute to the Implementation of the STEM Education Policy. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(1), 111–125.
Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti, M., Craig Schroeder, D., Delaney, A., Putnam, L. & Cremeans, C. (2018). Students' perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International journal of STEM education, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4
Selco, J. & Habbak, (2021). STEM Students’ Perceptions on Emergency Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Successes. Education Sciences, 11(12), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120799
Shojaee, M., Cui, Y., Shahidi, M. & Zhang, X. X. (2019). Validation of the Questionnaire of Students’ Attitudes toward STEM-PBL: Can Students’ Attitude toward STEM-PBL Predict their Academic Achievement? Psychology, 10, 213–234. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2019.102017
Simpson, A. & Bouhafa, Y. (2020). Youths and Adults’ Identity in STEM: a Systematic Literature Review. Journal for STEM Educ Res 3, 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00034-y
Tai, R.H., Ryoo, J., Worley, A., Dabney, K., Almarode, J. & Maltese, A. (2022). Designing a measure of student’s attitudes toward science: a longitudinal psychometric approach. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00332-4
Tardy, S., Zhang, D. & He, J. (2021) Secondary school science teachers’ attitudes towards STEM education in Liberia. International Journal of Science Education, 43(2), 223–246, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1864837
Terzi, R. & Kirilmazkaya, G. (2020). Examining predictive effects of attitudes toward STEM and demographic factors on academic achievement. Issues in Educational Research, 30(2), 736–755. https://www.iier.org.au/iier30/terzi.pdf
Thi, N., Van Bien, N., Lin, P., Lin, J. & Chang, C. (2020). Measuring Teachers’ Perceptions to Sustain STEM Education Development. Sustainability, 12(4), 1531. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041531
Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W. & Depaepe, F. (2017). Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Teaching Integrated Stem. HIVA KU Leuven.
Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W. & Depaepe, F. (2018). How school context and personal factors relate to teachers’ attitudes toward teaching integrated STEM. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 631–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798- 017-9416-1
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P. & Depaepe, F. (2018b). Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education. European Jourrnal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
Toma, R. B. & Greca, I. M. (2018). The Effect of Integrative STEM Instruction on Elementary Students’ Attitudes toward Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383–1395. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83676
Tunc, C. & Bagceci, B. (2021). Teachers' Views of the Implementation of STEM Approach in Secondary Schools and the Effects on Students. Pedagogical Research, 6(1), em0085. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/9295
Ugras, M. (2018). The Effect of STEM Activities on STEM Attitudes, Scientific Creativity and Motivation Beliefs of the Students and Their Views on STEM Education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(5), 165–182.
Van Aalderen-Smeets, S., Walma Van Der Molen, J. & Asma, L. (2011). Primary Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Science: A New Theoretical Framework. Science Education, 96(1), 158–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20467
Vennix, J., den Brok, P. & Taconis, R. (2018). Do outreach activities in secondary STEM education motivate students and improve their attitudes towards STEM? International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1263–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1473659
Vongai, M. (2019). A Theoretical Framework for Implementing STEM Education. In (Ed.), Theorizing STEM Education in the 21st Century. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88304
Wahono, B. & Chang, C. (2019). Assessing Teacher’s Attitude, Knowledge, and Application (AKA) on STEM: An Effort to Foster the Sustainable Development of STEM Education. Sustainability, 11(4):950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040950
Wiebe, E., Unfried, A. & Faber, M. (2018). The Relationship of STEM Attitudes and Career Interest. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1580. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92286
Widya, R. & Rahmi, Y. (2019). STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: a literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317. 012208. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012208
Wolfe, B. & Riggs, E. (2017). Macrosystem Analysis of Programs and Strategies to Increase Underrepresented Populations in the Geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.5408/17–256.1
Wong, K. & Maat, S. (2020). The Attitude of Primary School Teachers towards STEM Education. TEM Journal, 9(3), 1243–1251. https://www.temjournal.com/content/93/TEMJournalAugust_1243_1251.pdf
Zeidler, D. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty-first century? A sociocultural socio-scientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z
Zuljan, D., Valen?i? Zuljan, M. & Peji? Papak, P. (2021). Cognitive Constructivist Way of Teaching Scientific and Technical Contents. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 9(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-1-23-36
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493