“Supporting our Lost Boys”: A Research on Gender-based Science Education’s Hidden Curriculum in Malaysia

Nurfarahin Nasri, Nik Mohd Rahimi, Harwati Hashim, Nurfaradilla Mohamad Nasri

Abstract


Malaysia has had tremendous success in increasing women participation in science-related fields by diffusing empowering values into the formal school curricula. A subliminal effect of these female empowerment campaigns, however, is that male students are beginning to lag behind in science education, giving rise to the phenomenon known as "The Lost Boys." In light of the potential for a hidden curriculum to support gender-sensitive or gender-responsive science education, this research was aimed at exploring the hidden curriculum in science education and its impact on boys in science education. This research used the classical Delphi method involving 84 experts, whereby two rounds of questionnaires and one round of qualitative commentaries were used to gather information from a group of experts. Gender-biased notions were found in science education’s hidden curriculum, including the proliferation of feminist messages through outside classroom activities, the lack of gender awareness in teaching and training, and the centering of female mentoring in the field. This research further recommends strategies to explicitly address gender-biased issues in science education’s hidden curriculum to benefit both female and male students’ participation in science. It is hoped that this research serves as a guide for policy makers, school leaders and teachers to achieve gender equity in science education.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.10


Keywords


gender; gender equity; science education; hidden curriculum; Delphi methodology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abroampa, W. K. (2020). The Hidden Curriculum and the Development of Latent Skills: The Praxis. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 9(2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v9n2p70

Achyut P., Bhatla N., Verma H., Uttamacharya, Singh G., Bhattacharya S. and Verma R. (2016). Towards gender equality: The GEMS journey thus far. New Delhi, International Center for Research on Women. https://www.icrw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/GEMS-report-Jharkhand.pdf

Alan, S., Ertac, S., & Mumcu, I. (2018). Gender stereotypes in the classroom and effects on achievement. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 876-890. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00756

Atkins, K., Dougan, B. M., Dromgold-Sermen, M. S., Potter, H., Sathy, V., & Panter, A. T. (2020). “Looking at Myself in the Future”: how mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented groups. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00242-3

Beasley, M. A., & Fischer, M. J. (2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education, 15(4), 427-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9185-3

Brady, S. R. (2015). Utilizing and adapting the Delphi method for use in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1609406915621381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621381

Carl, J.D. (2013). Think Social Problems (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

Chetcuti, D. (2009). Identifying a gender?inclusive pedagogy from Maltese teachers’ personal practical knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701647996

Concannon-Gibney, T. (2021). Moving beyond the transmission of knowledge in the lecture hall: a self study. Professional Development in Education, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1876152

Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2022). Key Statistics of Labour Force in Malaysia, July 2022: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=124&bul_id=VWRxNmR3UVhEMHJSN0RQcExRaTdodz09&menu_id=Tm8zcnRjdVRNWWlpWjRlbmtlaDk1UT09

Elliot, D. L., Baumfield, V., Reid, K., & Makara, K. A. (2016). Hidden treasure: Successful international doctoral students who found and harnessed the hidden curriculum. Oxford Review of Education, 42(6), 733-748. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1229664

Erickson, S. S. (2022). The game of grades and the hidden curriculum. The Physics Teacher, 60(5), 398-399. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0010403

Feinberg, W., & Soltis, J. F. (2009). School and society. (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Fuertes-Prieto, M. Á., Andrés-Sánchez, S., Corrochano-Fernández, D., Urones-Jambrina, C., Delgado-Martín, M., Herrero-Teijón, P., & Ruiz, C. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ false beliefs in superstitions and pseudosciences in relation to science and technology. Science & Education, 29(5), 1235-1254. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2020Sc&Ed..29.1235F/doi:10.1007/s11191-020-00140-8

Giroux, H. A. (2001). Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Giroux, H. A., & Penna, A. N. (1979). Social education in the classroom: The dynamics of the hidden curriculum. Theory & Research in Social Education, 7(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1979.10506048

Goy, S. C., Wong, Y. L., Low, W. Y., Noor, S. N. M., Fazli-Khalaf, Z., Onyeneho, N., ... & GinikaUzoigwe, A. (2018). Swimming against the tide in STEM education and gender equality: a problem of recruitment or retention in Malaysia. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1793-1809. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1277383

Hansson, L. (2018). Science education, indoctrination, and the hidden curriculum. In History, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 283-306). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62616-1_11

Hasson, F., & Keeney, S. (2011). Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1695-1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005

Ismail, K., Hassan, S. S. S., & Sudan, S. A. (2019, December 21). Exploring Young Malaysians’ preferences in Stem-Oriented Career Paths. In Langkawi International Multidisciplinary Academic Conference (pp. 115).

Kerger, S., Martin, R., & Brunner, M. (2011). How can we enhance girls’ interest in scientific topics?. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 606-628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02019.x

Kerkhoven, A. H., Russo, P., Land-Zandstra, A. M., Saxena, A., & Rodenburg, F. J. (2016). Gender Stereotypes in Science Education Resources: A Visual Content Analysis. PloS One, 11(11), e0165037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165037

Kim, H. Y. (2016). Talking to learn: The hidden curriculum of a fifth-grade science class. English for Specific Purposes, 43, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.02.002

Kim, M., & Song, J. (2009). The effects of dichotomous attitudes toward science on interest and conceptual understanding in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2385-2406. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802563316

Lawson, T., Heaton, T., and Brown, A. (2009). Education and Training (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing

Lee, J., Rhee, D. E., & Rudolf, R. (2019). Teacher gender, student gender, and primary school achievement: Evidence from ten Francophone African countries. The Journal of Development Studies, 55(4), 661-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1453604

Lindner, J., Makarova, E., Bernhard, D., & Brovelli, D. (2022). Toward Gender Equality in Education—Teachers’ Beliefs about Gender and Math. Education Sciences, 12(6), 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060373

McQuillan, M. T., & Leininger, J. (2021). Supporting gender-inclusive schools: educators’ beliefs about gender diversity training and implementation plans. Professional Development in Education, 47(1), 156-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1744685

Ministry of Education (MOE). (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/media-cetak/penerbitan/dasar/1207-malaysia-education-blueprint-2013-2025/file (Accessed on 8 October 2022)

Ministry of Education (MOE). (2019). Malaysia Educational Statistics 2019. https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/media-cetak/penerbitan/quick-facts/2722-quick-facts-2019/file

Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE) (2016). Implementation guide for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in teaching and learning. Putrajaya: MOE.

Neubauer, D. E. and Kaur, S. (2019). Gender and the Changing Face of Higher Education in Asia Pacific. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02795-7

Niederberger, M., & Spranger, J. (2020). Delphi technique in health sciences: a map. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457

Park, H., Behrman, J. R., & Choi, J. (2018). Do single-sex schools enhance students’ STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) outcomes?. Economics of Education Review, 62, 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.econedurev.2017.10.007

Puteh, F., & Mohamad, N. (2018). Leadership and gender in the public sector: The mediating effect of job satisfaction. Journal of Administrative Science, 15(2), 99-117. https://jas.uitm.edu.my/images/2018_DEC/JAS8.pdf

Sabbe, E., & Aelterman, A. (2007). Gender in teaching: A literature review. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(5), 521-538. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/13540600701561729

Saffie, N. A. M., & Rasmani, K. A. (2016, July 24-27). Fuzzy delphi method: Issues and challenges. In 2016 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/LISS.2016.7854490

Sáinz, M., Solé, J., Fàbregues, S., & García-Cuesta, S. (2021). Secondary School Teachers’ Views of Gender Differences in School Achievement and Study Choices in Spain. SAGE Open, 11(3), 21582440211047573. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047573

Strom, K. J., & Viesca, K. M. (2021). Towards a complex framework of teacher learning-practice. Professional Development in Education, 47(2-3), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1827449

Tienxhi, J. Y. (2017). The Gender Gap in Malaysian Public Universities: Examining the'Lost Boys. Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.14425/JICE.2017.6.1.0116

von Schönfeld, K. C., Tan, W., Wiekens, C., Salet, W., & Janssen-Jansen, L. (2019). Social learning as an analytical lens for co-creative planning. European Planning Studies, 27(7), 1291-1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1579303

World Bank. (2021). Malaysia to Achieve High Income Status Between 2024 and 2028, but Needs to Improve the Quality, Inclusiveness, and Sustainability of Economic Growth to Remain Competitive. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2021/03/16/aiminghighmalaysia (Accessed on 8 October 2022).

Yüksel, S. (2005). Kohlberg and Hidden Curriculum in Moral Education: An Opportunity for Students' Acquisition of Moral Values in the New Turkish Primary Education Curriculum. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 5(2). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Kohlberg-and-Hidden-Curriculum-in-Moral-Education%3A-Y%C3%BCksel/7f819afc6f42c83ed3c3b29047ac83ccaf56e62a


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493