An Approach to Teaching the Production of a Literature review for a Student Research Report

David Francis Dalton

Abstract


Technical and academic writing is a challenge and generally not a popular activity amongst university students. Writing literature reviews for student research projects is complex, both cognitively and linguistically. It involves a range of skills including critical thinking, problem solving and, of course, appropriate language knowledge.  This case study describes an approach designed to make this task more accessible to novice student writers and to permit them to take some ownership of the generative elements of producing the review. Initial student feedback indicates a high level of satisfaction with the approach and resulting grades. 

Keywords: literature review, academic, approach, ownership


Keywords


literature review, academic, approach, ownership

Full Text:

PDF

References


Reference List

Ankawi, A. (2015) The academic writing challenges faced by Saudi students studying in New Zealand. Thesis submitted to Auckland University of Technology as MA requirement.

Bitchener, J and Turner, E; (2006). Literature reviews and the concept of argument: evaluating an EAL teaching approach. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics 12 (2), 17–36.

Bitchener, J and Turner, E. (2008) An approach to teaching the writing of literature reviews. Retrieved from: http://www.zeitschrift-schreiben.eu/Online 11. .

Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34 (6), 3-15

Cazden, C, B. (1988) Classroom discourse: the language of teaching and learning. London, Heinemann.

Dalton, D. (2011) An investigation of an approach to teaching critical reading to native

Arabic speaking students. Arab World English Journal. 2, No 4. Dec, 58-87.

Dickinson, D. & Tabors, P. (2001). Beginning literacy with language. Baltimore: Paul E. Brookes.

Donahue, L. (2009). The write beginning. Pembroke Publishers, Ontario, Canada.

Educational Resources Information Center. (1982). ERIC processing manual (Section 5: Cataloging). Washington, DC.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., and Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept: state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–119.

Funderburk- Razo, R, M and Hidalgo, H. (2014) Writing the literature review: Challenges of two Mexican novice writers, Rhetoric, Professional Communication and Globalization, 6, 38-55

Levy, Y and Ellis, T, J. (2006) A systems approach to conduct an effective iiterature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science Journal 9, 181-212.

Randolph, J, J. (2009) A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. 14, (13), 1-13.

Saville, B, K, Zinn, T, E and Kakobsen, V, J (2012). Leading discussions. In Benassi, V, A and Buskist, W (eds), Effective College and University Teaching. Los Angeles: Sage

Schuman, R (2013). The end of the college essay. Retrieved from: http://www.slate.com/articles/life/education/2013/12/college_papers_students_hate_writing_them_professors_hate_grading_them_let.html

Siti Hamin, S. and Mohamed. I (2012). Rhetorical awareness and Jordanian EFL students’ expository writing. European Scientific Journal, 8 (26), 260-275.

Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26 (2), 13-23.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493