Online Interaction Techniques Used at a Rural-Based University: Implications for Online Pedagogy
Abstract
Online learning is often associated with student isolation, loneliness, and lack of adequate opportunities for interaction. This study, part of a more extensive study on online interaction, sought to establish from the distance education students' point of view the common techniques employed to promote online interaction. The Community of Inquiry (CoI) developed by Garrison, Anderson, and Archer (2001) informed the study. The study used a post-positivist research paradigm and followed a mixed-method research approach and a concurrent triangulation design. A stratified random sample of 361 students was used to collect quantitative data using a highly structured questionnaire. Qualitative data were collected from four focus groups. Quantitative data were analysed by SPSS using descriptive statistics. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. The two data sets were merged at the interpretation stage. Ethical issues such as study approval, ethical clearance, and informed consent were addressed. The study found that common and uncommon online interaction techniques were used. In instances where techniques were commonly used, it was indicative of the pedagogical abilities of the course instructors. On the contrary, where techniques were uncommon, it pointed out existing pedagogical deficiencies. The study concludes that online pedagogies that promote interaction and achieve higher-order learning outcomes should be built into online course design and implementation.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.11.20
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adetimirin, A. (2015). An empirical study of online discussion forums by library and information science postgraduate students using technology acceptance model 3. Journal of Information Technology in Educational Research, 14(1), 257-269. https://doi.org/10.28945/2269
Ajayi, P. O., & Ajayi, L. F. (2020). Use of online collaborative learning strategy in enhancing postgraduates’ learning outcomes in science education. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(8), 504–510. https://doi.org/10.589/ERR2020.4023
Alabo, H.B. & Emmah, V.T. (2014). Online discussion forum: a tool for effective student-teacher interaction. International Journal of Applied Science Research and Review, 1(3), 111-116.
Ansari, J. A. N., & Khan, N. A. (2020). Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning, the new domain of learning. Smart Learning Environments, 7(9), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00118-7
Baishya, D., & Maheshwari, S. (2019). WhatsApp Groups in Academic Context: Exploring the Academic Uses of WhatsApp Groups among the Students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 11(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.641765
Biriyai, A. H., & Thomas, E. V. (2014). Online discussion forum: A tool for effective student-teacher interaction. International Journal of Applied Sciences, 1(3), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2525047
Burgess, A., van Diggele, C., Roberts, C., & Mellis, C. (2020). Team-based learning: design, facilitation and participation. BMC Medical Education, 20(461), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y
Davis, S. (2021). Online forum participation in an online master of computer science program. In G. Marks (Ed.), Proceedings of International Journal on E-Learning 2021 (pp. 411–432). Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/181092/
Clarke, V., Braun, V., & Hayfield, N. (2015). Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, 3, 222-248.
DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Siraj, S., & Zakaria, A. R (2014). Interactions in online forums: a case study among first-year undergraduate students. Frontiers in Education, 2(1), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpm.2016.61004
Du, Z., Wang, F., Wang, S. & Xiao, X. (2022). Enhancing Learner Participation in online discussion forums in Massive Open Online Courses: The role of mandatory participation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), 1 – 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819640
Edeh, M. O., Edeh, C. C. D., Alhuseen, O. A., Quadri, N. H. N. & Sumaya, S. (2019). Online discussion forum as a tool for interactive learning and communication. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(4), 4852 – 4859. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D8062.118419
Elkaseh, A. M., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2016). Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of social media for e-learning in Libyan higher education: A structural equation modelling analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(3), 192-199. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.683
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105.
Garrison, R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge.
Goyal, S., Khaliq, F. & Vaney N. (2023). Implementation of online learning Management system 'Moodle' as a blended approach to online teaching. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 67, 64 - 72. https://doi.org/10.25259/IJPP_208_2022
Greenhow, C., & Galvin, S. (2020). Teaching with social media: evidence-based strategies for making remote higher education less remote. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(?), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0138
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Asim, M. & Suma, Q.R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3(1), 275 – 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Holz, S. (2017). “How can we address the 4 Cs of education online?” https://blog.neolms.com/how-can-we-address-the-4cs-of-education-online/
Ice, P., & Nagel, L. (2010). Introduction to the community of inquiry framework and applications for programmatic improvement. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on World Wide Web Applications, Durban, 21-23 September 2010. http://www.zaw3.co.za
Jaggers, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Education,95(1), 270-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014
Kukard, K. (2020). Creating a collaborative learning environment online and in a blended history environment during COVID-19. Yesterday & Today, 24, 205-218.
Kilinc, H., & Altinpulluk, H. (2021). Use of Discussion Forums in Online Learning Environments, 2nd World Conference on Teaching and Education. 19 – 21 February 2021. Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijhep.v2i1.25
Kumar, P., Saxena, C., & Baber, H. (2021). Student-content interaction in e-learning-the moderating role of perceived harm of COVID-19 in assessing the satisfaction of students. Smart Learning Environments, 8(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00149-8
Lima, D. P. R., Gerosa, M. A., Conte, T. U., & Netto, J. F. M. (2019). The instructors' perspective is what to expect and how to improve online discussion forums. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 10(22), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-019-0120-0
Maphosa, C., Mthethwa-Kunene, E. K., & Rugube, T. (2020). Quality assuring online-Learning using the Commonwealth of Learning Regional Community of Practice for Quality Assurance Guidelines. US-China Education Review, 10(5), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2020.05.001
Mkhonta-Khoza, P. P., & Rugube, T. T. (2021). Why the BigBlueButton as “the” on-time-inclusive online teaching and learning platform. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 26(11), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2611010814
Nieuwoudt, J. (2018). Exploring online interaction and online learner participation in an online science subject through the lens of the interaction equivalence theorem. Student Success, 9(4), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i1.424
Popovic, N., Popovic, T., Rovcanin, D. I., & Cmiljanic, O. A (2018). Moodle-based Blended learning solution for physiology education in Montenegro: a case study. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(1):111-117. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00155.2017
Premagowrie, S., Kalai, V. R., & Ree, C. H. (2014). Online forum: a platform that affects students’ learning? American International Journal of Social Science, 3(7), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss11.272
Song, D., Rice, M., & Oh, E. Y. (2019). Participation in online courses and interaction with a virtual agent. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3998
Suárez-Lantarón, B., Deocano-Ruíz, Y., García-Perales, N., & Castillo-Reche, I.S. (2022). The educational use of WhatsApp. Sustainability, 14(1), 1-14 10510. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710510
Sugeng, B., & Suryani, A. W. (2018). Presentation-Based learning and peer evaluation to enhance active learning and self-confidence in the Financial Management classroom. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 173-201. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2018.15.1.7
Sula, G., Haxhihyseni, S., & Noti, K. (2021). Wikis as a tool for co-constructed learning in higher education – An exploratory study in an Albanian higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(24), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i24.26541
Sula, G., & Sulstarova, A. (2022). Using Wikis as a Teaching Tool for Novice Teachers – Pedagogical Implications. Journal of Learning for Development, 9(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v9i2.638
Thomas , C, Sarma, P. K. A. V., Gajula, S. S., & Jayagopi, D. B. (2022). Automatic prediction of presentation style and student engagement from videos. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(1), 1 – 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100082
Ulla, M. B, & Perales, W. F. (2021). Facebook as an integrated online learning support application during the COVID-19 pandemic: Thai university students' experiences and perspectives. Heliyon, 7(1), 1 – 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08317
University of South Africa (2010). Task Team 4: Student Support, enabling discussion classes at UNISA through satellite broadcasting and video conferencing. Pretoria: UNISA Press.
Wyszomirska, R. M, Pennaforte, R., de Barros Costa, F., Warren, E., & Quintas-Mendes, A. (2021). Team-Based Learning: A promising strategy for use in online distance education. Creative Education, 12(1), 278-292. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.121020
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493