Brief Multisensory Training Enhances Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition in Both High and Low Performers
Abstract
Research in the field of vocabulary acquisition has demonstrated that enriching novel words with sensorimotor information enhances memory outcome compared to reading. However, it has been asserted that enrichment might exceed the cognitive load of low performers and therefore be detrimental to them. Here, in a brief training, thirty-two subjects learned thirty novel items of a foreign language according to three conditions: (1) reading, (2) reading and listening, (3) reading and listening and watching an actress performing a gesture semantically related to the words. Conditions (2) and (3) enriched the baseline (1) with multisensory information. Memory performance was assessed through written tests immediately after learning. Results indicate that both high and low performers benefit from enrichment. The significant interaction between group and method in one of the tests shows that low performers learn better through enrichment than by only reading the words. Implications for education are discussed.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, Alan. (2003). Working memory and language: an overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189-208.
Bagui, S. (1998). Reasons for increased learning using multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. , 7, 3-18.
Bisson, Marie-Josée, van Heuven, Walter J. B., Conklin, Kathy, & Tunney,
Richard J. (2014). The role of verbal and pictorial information in multimodal incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(7), 1306-1326. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.979211
Call, R. J., & Switzky, H. N. (1975). Effects of auditory and pictorial-auditory stimulus enrichment on the verbal abstracting abilities of low-SES children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80(3), 256-265.
Cherry, Katie E., Hawley, Karri S., Jackson, Erin M., Volaufova, Julia, Su, L. Joseph, Jazwinski, S. Michal, & Louisiana Healthy Aging, Study. (2008). Pictorial Superiority Effects in Oldest-Old People. Memory (Hove, England), 16(7), 728-741. doi: 10.1080/09658210802215534
Choo, L. E. E. Bee, Lin, Debbita T. A. N. Ai, & Pandian, Ambigapathy. (2012). Language Learning Approaches: A Review of Research on Explicit and Implicit Learning in Vocabulary Acquisition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55(0), 852-860. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.572
Clark, James, & Paivio, Allan. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-210. doi: 10.1007/bf01320076
Craik, F. I., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268-294.
Danielsson, Henrik, Zottarel, Valentina, Palmqvist, Lisa, & Lanfranchi, Silvia. (2015). The effectiveness of working memory training with individuals with intellectual disabilities – a meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01230
Engelkamp, Johannes, & Zimmer, Hubert D. (1994). Human memory : a multimodal approach. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
Golestani, N. (2014). Brain structural correlates of individual differences at low-to high-levels of the language processing hierarchy: A review of new approaches to imaging research. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(1), 6-34. doi: 10.1177/1367006912456585
Gu, Yongqi, & Johnson, Robert Keith. (1996). Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Language Learning Outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01355.x
Harp, Shannon F., & Mayer, Richard E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414-434. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414
Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Language Instruction (pp. 258-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V. (2009). The bilingual advantage in novel word learning. Psychon Bull Rev, 16(4), 705-710. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.705
Kaushanskaya, Margarita, Yoo, Jeewon, & Van Hecke, Stephanie. (2013). Word learning in adults with second language experience: Effects of phonological and referent familiarity. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 56(2), 667-678. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0084)
Krashen, Stephen. (2013). Reading and vocabulary acquisition: supporting evidence and some objections. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 27-43.
Macedonia, M. (2014). Bringing back the body into the mind: gestures enhance word learning in foreign language. Front Psychol, 5, 1467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01467
Macedonia, M., & Mueller, K. Mapping the body into the brain: Neural representation of novel words learned through gestures and its impact on memory. Submitted Paper.
Macedonia, M., Müller, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2010). Neural Correlates of High Performance in Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(3), 125-134. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01091.x
Macedonia, M., Müller, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). The impact of iconic gestures on foreign language word learning and its neural substrate. Human Brain Mapping, 32(6), 982-998. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21084
Macedonia, M., Repetto, C., & Ischebeck, Anja K. Depth of encoding through gestures in foreign language word learning. Submitted Manuscript.
Mayer, K. M., Yildiz, I. B., Macedonia, M., & von Kriegstein, K. (2015). Visual and motor cortices differentially support the translation of foreign language words. Curr Biol, 25(4), 530-535. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.068
Mayer, Richard E., Heiser, Julie, & Lonn, Steve. (2001). Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187-198. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187
Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1969). Concrete Image and Verbal Memory Codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80(2p1), 279-&.
Paivio, Allan. (2006). Mind and its evolution : a dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah, N.J. ; London: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1995). Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots. Q J Exp Psychol A, 48(1), 98-107.
Perlmutter, M. , & Myers, N.A. (1975). Young children's coding and storage of visual and verbal material. Child Development, 46(1), 215-219.
Schroeder, R. W., Twumasi-Ankrah, P., Baade, L. E., & Marshall, P. S. (2012). Reliable Digit Span: a systematic review and cross-validation study. Assessment, 19(1), 21-30. doi: 10.1177/1073191111428764
Seghier, M. L. (2012). The Angular Gyrus: Multiple Functions and Multiple Subdivisions. Neuroscientist. doi: 1073858412440596 [pii]
1177/1073858412440596
Shams, Ladan, & Seitz, Aaron R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411-417.
Shams, Ladan, Wozny, David R, Kim, Robyn S, & Seitz, Aaron. (2011). Influences of multisensory experience on subsequent unisensory processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00264
Tewes, U. (1998). Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Erwachsene - (HAWIE-R) Revision 1991 Bern, Stuttgart, Toronto: Huber.
Touron, D. R. (2015). Memory avoidance by older adults: When `old dogs' won't perform their `new tricks'. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 24(3), 170-176. doi: 10.1177/0963721414563730
Xiang, Huadong, Dediu, Dan, Roberts, Leah, Oort, Erik van, Norris, David G., & Hagoort, Peter. (2012). The Structural Connectivity Underpinning Language Aptitude, Working Memory, and IQ in the Perisylvian Language Network. Language Learning, 62, 110-130. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00708.x
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493