The Impact of E-books on Thai EFL Undergraduates' Acquisition of Affixes and their Contentment with This Medium
Abstract
The learning of affixes (prefixes and suffixes) by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) undergraduates is paramount since it enhances their vocabulary and helps them achieve fluency and proficiency in the English language. This paper aims to evaluate students’ command of affixes by using an electronic book (e-book) as a teaching method and examining students’ level of satisfaction regarding the learning of affixes through the e-book. The study employed a mixed-methods research design and included a sample of 50 first-year English for Communication students from Rajamangala University of Technology, Srivijaya. The research instruments used in this study included the pre-test, post-test, and an e-book satisfaction questionnaire, respectively. An interview was also used as a data-gathering tool in this research work. The findings indicated that the post-test results (26.40) yielded a superior outcome compared to the pre-test results (17.80). Furthermore, the e-book had an overall satisfaction rating of 4.57. In conclusion, the study found that students can significantly enhance their understanding of affixes, specifically prefixes and suffixes, by using unique e-books. For English teachers who encourage the use of e-books, the study's findings will have important implications since they will be able to use e-books for various uses in their respective classes when teaching EFL students.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.10.8
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aarts B, Chalker S, & Weiner E. (2014). The Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aslan, P. (2024). The role of morphological awareness and background knowledge in Turkish EFL students' writing ability. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 68, 272-302. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1436044
Baker, W., & Jarunthawatchai, W. (2017). English language policy in Thailand. European journal of language policy, 9(1), 27-44.
Beimers, K. D. (2014). Correlation between interactive EBooks and printed text in reading achievement and student interest. Master of Education Program Theses. Paper 48. https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047 &context=med_theses
Biranvand, A., & Khasseh, A. A. (2014). E-book reading and its impact on academic status of students at Payame Noor University, Iran. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2014(1). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.084938839628&partnerID=40&md5=142e6e24689519ea832fb3001b0b f5c4
Budhwar, K. (2017). The role of technology in education. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 2(8), 55-57. http://www.ijeast.com/papers/55- 57,TESMA208,IJEAST.pdf
Cabe, A. C., & Isla, N. R. B. (2024). The effect of morphological awareness on lexical knowledge of grade 7 students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(1), 236-250.
Caplan, D. (Ed). (1998). Neurolinguistics and linguistics aphasiology: An introduction (Cambridge studies in speech science and communication) (sixth ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Catoto, J. S. (2024). Exploring interest through pleasure reading: The E-reading experiences of ESL students. The New English Teacher ISSN 2985-0959 (Online), 18(2), 1-12. http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/newEnglishTeacher/article/view/7635
Chen, C. N., Chen, S. C., Chen, S. H. E., & Wey, S. C. (2013). The Effects of Extensive Reading via E-Books on Tertiary Level EFL Students' Reading Attitude, Reading Comprehension, and Vocabulary. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(2), 303-312.
Chou, I. C. (2012). Understanding on-screen reading behaviors in academic contexts: A case study of five graduate English-as-a-second-language students. Computer assisted language learning, 25(5), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.597768
Chou, I. C. (2016). Reading for the purpose of responding to literature: EFL students’ perceptions of e-books. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.881388
Fangyi, Z., Yixuan, S., & Xinru, L. (2017). Exploring the affix knowledge of EFL students in Taiwan. Retrieved March 20, 2019 from https://senior.wagor.tc.edu.tw/sites/default/files/page/page_li/ Exploring%20the%20Affix%20Knowledge%20of%20EFL%20Students%20in%20Taiwan.pdf?fb clid=IwAR3j3YM0r5_LJ3E7kBvG3E-MF5BXct32SRaqwP0w2p0di_5rsoSOwDFyn7s
Fotokian, M., & Rahmatipasand, Z. (2019). The effect of teaching prefixes on vocabulary learning of intermediate EFL students. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 5(2), 101- 110.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2011) Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2–11. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2011/emerging.pdf
Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Smartphones and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 3–17. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2017/emerging.pdf
Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Hackett.
Guna, S., Lehon, I. N., Sapong, M., Sambora, A. R., & Kurnianto, Y. T. (2024). An analysis of inflectional and derivational affixes of the students’ academic writing. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 10(1), 396-408. https://doi.org/10.55637/jr.10.2.9751.396-408
Haspelmath, M. (2021). Bound forms, welded forms, and affixes: Basic concepts for morphological comparison. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 1, 7-28.
Haspelmath, M., & Sims, A. (2013). Understanding morphology (2nd Ed). Routledge.
Harraqi, M. (2017). The relationship between morphological knowledge and the breadth of vocabulary knowledge among Moroccan EFL university students. Advances in Social Psychology, 2(2), 14-22.
Huang, L. Y., & Hsieh, Y. J. (2012). Consumer electronics acceptance based on innovation attributes and switching costs: The case of e-book readers. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(3), 218-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2011.12.005
Ikrimah, I., & Asi, N. (2024). Morphological interference on students' writing at the eleventh grade of Man Kota Palangka Raya. Jurnal JOEPALLT (Journal of EnglishPedagogy, Linguistics, Literature, and Teaching), 12(1), 16-31. https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v12i1.3570
Kaewsawas, N., & Suksawas, W (2020). Proceedings of the RSU International Research Conference 2020. Exploring English Prefix Knowledge focusing on im-and in-of Thai EFL Students. 2020. https://rsucon.rsu.ac.th/proceedings https://rsucon.rsu.ac.th/files/proceedings/inter2020/IN20-113.pdf
Kalee, S., Rasyid, Y., & Muliastuti, L. (2018). Error analysis on the use of affixation in Indonesian paper written by Thai student. Lingua Cultura, 12(3), 289-293. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i3.4307
Karliova, H. (2009). Teaching English vocabulary through Latinate word parts to undergraduate students learning English as a foreign language. Unpublished master’s thesis). Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kaur, J. (2011). Intercultural communication in English as a lingua franca: Some sources of misunderstanding. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(1), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2011.004
Kozminsky, E., & Asher-Sadon, R. (2013). Media type influence preschooler’s literacy development: E-book versus printed book reading. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 9(17), 231-245. Retrieved from http://www.ijello.org/Volume9/IJELLOv9p233247Kozminsky0865.pdf
Letchumanan, M. (2024). Understanding the use of mobile E-Books among Mathematics postgraduates. Higher Learning Research Communications, 14(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v14i1.1480
Lewis (1993). Lexical approach to second language teaching. ERIC Digest.
Lieber, R., & Štekauer, P. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology. OUP Oxford.
Liu, Q. L. (2011). Does content knowledge affect TOEFL iBT reading performance? A confirmatory approach to differential item functioning. Applied Measurement in Education, 24, 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2009.tb02186.x
Martin-Beltrán, M., Tigert, J. M., Peercy, M. M., & Silverman, R. D. (2017). Using digital texts vs. paper texts to read together: Insights into engagement and mediation of literacy practices among linguistically diverse students. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.01.009
McCarthy, C. A. (2017). Introduction to English morphology: Words and their structure. Edinburgh university press.
McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford University Press.
Merkle, A. C., Ferrell, L. K., Ferrell, O. C., & Hair, J. F., Jr. (2022). Evaluating e-book effectiveness and the impact on student engagement. Journal of Marketing Education, 44(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753211035162
Millar, M., & Schrier, T. (2015). Digital or printed textbooks: which do students prefer and why?. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 15(2), 166-185.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2015.1026474
Miller, J. E., & Brown, E. K. (2013). The Cambridge dictionary of linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Mousavi, S., & Hasani, M. T. (2014). The effect of the number affixes on vocabulary learning of Iranian advanced EFL students. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied World (IJLLALW), 5(3), 70-83. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=adb2b8e44aec8f2a07814930abdafce6ce94a1d3
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How a large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59?82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.011
Nontasee, W., & Sukying, A. (2020). L2 word learnability in Thai high school students of English [Doctoral dissertation, Mahasarakham University].
Noyer, R. R. (1992). Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
Ntagwabira, V., Mitari, M., Nshimiyimana, A., Majyambere, E., Hakizimana, J., & Mahoro, C. (2024). The impact of English printed books on improving students’ English reading skills in twelve years of basic education in remote areas: A case study of Muhanga district, Rwanda. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(2), 620-630. ajol-file-journals_642_articles_272412_6675be76bad83
O’Grady W., & Archibald J. (2016). Contemporary Linguistic Analysis: An Introduction.(8th Ed). Toronto: Pearson.
Otabekova, S. (2024). Strategies of vocabulary reinforcement for adult students. Science and Innovation, 3(B5), 302-314.
Plag, I. (Ed.). (2018). Cambridge textbooks in linguistics: Word-formation in English (second ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press
Radford, A. (2009). Linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reid, C. (2016). E-books and print books can have different effects on literacy comprehension. Education Masters, 5, 325. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041379
Richards, J. C. (2010). Competence and performance in language teaching. RELC Journal, 41(2), 101-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210372953
Rowe, B. M., & Levine, D. P. (2022). A concise introduction to linguistics. New York: Routledge.
Saengpakdeejit, R. (2014). Awareness of vocabulary learning strategies among EFL students in Khon Kaen University. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(6), 1101-1108.
https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol04/06/01.pdf
Sari, S. Y., Rahim, F. R., Sundari, P. D., & Aulia, F. (2022). The importance of ebooks in improving students’ skills in physics learning in the 21st century: A literature review. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2309(1), Article 012061.
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge university press.
Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do students know?. TESOL quarterly, 36(2), 145-171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588328
Stockwell, G. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary Computer-Assisted Language Learning (pp. 201–216). Bloomsbury Academic.
Smith, F. (1982). Understanding Reading, third Edition, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Smith, T. (2008). Teaching vocabulary expeditiously: Three keys to improving vocabulary instruction. English Journal, 97(4), 20-25.
a. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej20086290
Sukying, A. (2017). The relationship between receptive and productive affix knowledge and vocabulary size in an EFL Context [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia].
Sukying, A. (2018). The acquisition of English affix knowledge in L2 students. NIDA Journal of Language and Communication, 23(34), 89-102.
Sukying, A. (2020). Word knowledge through morphological awareness in EFL students. TESOL International Journal, 15(01), 74?85.
Sukying, A. (2023). The role of vocabulary size and depth in predicting postgraduate students’ second language writing performance. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1), 575-603.
Tamura, T., & Shirahata, T. (2017). Knowledge of English prefixes among Japanese adult students of English. JACET Journal, 61, 69-87. https://doi.org/10.32234/jacetjournal.61.0_69
Teng, M. F., & Zhang, D. (2024). Task-induced involvement load, vocabulary learning in a foreign language, and their association with metacognition. Language Teaching Research, 28(2), 531-555. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211008798
Thiendathong, P., & Sukying, A. (2021). Vocabulary learning strategies used by Thai high school students in science, language, and English programs. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 12, 306-317. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.21
Tinh, D. C., Nam, N. T., & Bon, B. N. (2024). Exploring the impact of technology in enhancing English reading skill. International Journal of English Language Studies, 6(2), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2024.6.2.16
Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Toluspayeva, D., Shubina, O., Apshe, K., Shukan, A., Nurguzhina, G., & Mirambaevna, A. B. (2024). Affixation in morphological word formation and construction of lexemes in the English and Kazakh languages. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 12(1), 326-336. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2024.2019058.3318
Truss, A., McBride, K., Porter, H., Anderson, V., Stilwell, G., Philippou, C., & Taggart, A. (2024). Learner engagement with instructor?generated video. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13450
Turner, H., & Williams, R. L. (2007). Vocabulary development and performance of multiple-choice exams in large entry-level courses. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), 64-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2007.10850198
Uy, K. A., & Guillermo, R. (2024). The effect of language intervention activities on the performance of elementary students. Social Science and Humanities Journal (SSHJ), 8(05), 3731-3745. https://doi.org/10.18535/sshj.v8i05.1116
Vermeulen, E. J., & Volman, M. L. (2024). Promoting student engagement in online education: Online learning experiences of Dutch university students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09704-3
Yoon, T. (2013). Exploring a literacy development in young Korean ELLS with online e-books. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 253-259. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.2.253-259
Zhang, L., & Fan, L. (2024). Strategic analysis of e-book pricing models in the presence of network externalities. European Journal of International Management, 22(1), 80-103. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2024.135214
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493