A Socio-Constructivist Perspective on Problem-Solving Approaches in Mathematics: Perceptions of Future Primary Education Teachers

Daniela Olivares

Abstract


This study investigates the perceptions of future primary education teachers regarding the implementation of a problem-solving teaching approach from a socio-constructivist perspective. Although previous research has shown the benefits of problem-solving in mathematics education, few studies have yet focused on preservice teachers in primary education, particularly within a socio-constructivist framework. Therefore, this study addresses this gap by exploring the effectiveness and challenges of the Building Thinking Classrooms approach developed by Peter Liljedahl. The study was conducted through a case study design involving 36 first-year preservice teachers enrolled in a mathematics didactics course at a public university in Chile. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through surveys, field logs, and classroom observations. The data analysis included descriptive statistics and content analysis to understand the students’ perceptions of problem difficulty, engagement, and the overall approach. The findings reveal that the problem-solving approach was positively perceived by the participants, highlighting its role in fostering critical thinking, collaboration, and a deep understanding of mathematical concepts. However, challenges were identified, particularly regarding group work and the autonomy required in solving problems. Furthermore, the study identified areas in which additional support could enhance the effectiveness of problem-solving approaches. This research underlines the importance of integrating problem-solving approaches into teacher education programmes and highlights the need for future research on the long-term impacts and strategies needed to support autonomy and collaborative learning.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.9.12


Keywords


initial teacher training; motivation theories; problem-solving; socio-constructivist approach

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bailey, J., & Taylor, M. (2015). Experiencing a mathematical problem-solving teaching approach: Opportunities to identify ambitious teaching practices. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 17(2), 111?124. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085902

Bandura, A. (1987). Pensamiento y acción: Fundamentos sociales [Thought and action: Social foundations]. Martínez Roca.

Barana, A., Brancaccio, A., Conte, A., Fissore, C., Floris, F., & Marchisio, M. (2019). Immersive teacher training experience on the methodology of problem posing and solving in mathematics [Conference session]. 5th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’19). Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd19.2019.9489

Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. Yale University Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Fluir: Una psicología de la felicidad [Flow: A psychology of happiness] (9th ed.). Kairós.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.

Darmawati, Y., & Mustadi, A. (2023). The effect of problem-based learning on the critical thinking skills of elementary school students. Journal of Prima Edukasia, 11(2), 142?151. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v11i2.55620

Delgado-Rodríguez, S., Carrascal, S., & García-Fandino, R. (2023). Design, development, and validation of an educational methodology using immersive augmented reality for STEAM education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.1.1250

Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving (L. S. Lees, Trans.). Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 1–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093599

Erickson, A. (2020). Case studies. In R. Kimmons, & S. Caskurlu (Eds.), The students’ guide to learning design and research (pp. 33?36). EdTech Books.

Frederick-Jonah, T. M. (2022). The implications of social constructivism as a philosophical theory in the professional training of the mathematics teacher. International Journal of Science and Research, 11(1), 23–27. https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR211229000631

Fukuzawa, S., Boyd, C., & Cahn, J. (2017). Student motivation in response to problem-based learning. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 175–188. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v10i0.4748

Grandy, G. (2009). Instrumental case study. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (Vol. 1, pp. 473–475). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397.n90

Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, M. del P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación [Research methodology] (6th edition). Mc-Graw Hill.

Jäder, J. (2022). Creative and conceptual challenges in mathematical problem solving. Nordisk Matematikkdidaktikk, 27(3), 49–68.

https://ncm.gu.se/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/27_3_049068_jader.pdf

Jiang, P., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., & Xiong, B. (2022). Preservice mathematics teachers’ perceptions of mathematical problem solving and its teaching: A case from China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 998586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998586

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Krosnick, J., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. In P. V. Marsden, & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (pp. 263–313). Emerald. https://web.stanford.edu/dept/communication/faculty/krosnick/docs/2010/2010%20Handbook%20of%20Survey%20Research.pdf

Lee, N. H., Wong, Z. Y., Lee, J., & Cheng, L. P. (2022). The effect of constructivist instruction on learning engagement in mathematics lessons: A flow theory perspective. The Mathematician Educator, 3(2), 133?153. https://ame.org.sg/2022/12/29/tme2022-vol-3-no-2-pp-133-153/

Lester, F., & Cai, J. (2016). Can mathematical problem solving be taught? Preliminary answers from 30 years of research. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 117–135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_8

Liljedahl, P. (2018). Building thinking classrooms. In A. Kajander, J. Holm, & E. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning secondary school mathematics: Canadian perspectives in an international context (pp. 307–316). Springer.

Liljedahl, P. (2020). Building thinking classrooms in mathematics, grades K–12: 14 teaching practices for enhancing learning. Corwin Press.

Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40730-2_1

Martinez-Roig, R., Iglesias-Martínez, M. J., & Cabezas, I. L. (2023). Las emociones percibidas por el profesorado en activo en el uso de metodologías activas en el aula [The emotions perceived by active teachers in the use of active methodologies in the classroom]. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives, (30), 39?59. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/131285

Mason, J. (2015). When is a problem? Contribution in honour of Jeremy Kilpatrick. In E. Silver, & C. Keitel-Kreidt (Eds.), Pursuing excellence in mathematics education (pp. 55–69). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11952-6_4

Mason, J. (2016). When is a problem…? “When” is actually the problem! In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 263–285). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_16

Mendaglio, S. (2003). Qualitative case study in gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(3), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302600302

Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass.

Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Westenskow, A. (2013). Effects of virtual manipulatives on student achievement and mathematics learning. International Journal of Virtual & Personal Learning Environments, 4(3). http://doi.org/10.4018/jvple.2013070103

Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). Oxford University Press.

Nurhayati, Rahmat, P. S., & Suryani, Y. (2024). The effect of using problem based learning model on critical thinking ability with moderator variable of learning motivation. Eduvest–Journal of Universal Studies, 4(8), 7294–7311. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i8.1722

Paenza, A. (2015). Detectives: Una invitación a develar 60 enigmas de la matemática recreativa [Detectives: An invitation to unravel 60 puzzles of recreational mathematics]. Sudamericana.

Pepper, C. (2009). Problem based learning in science. Issues in Educational Research, 19(2), 128–141. https://iier.org.au/iier19/pepper.pdf

Rott, B., Specht, B., & Knipping, C. (2021). A descriptive phase model of problem-solving processes. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53, 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01244-3

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). La teoría de la autodeterminación y la facilitación de la motivación intrínseca, el desarrollo social, y el bienestar [Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being]. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2000_RyanDeci_SpanishAmPsych.pdf

Säfström, A. I., Lithner, J., Palm, T., Palmberg, B., Sidenvall, J., Andersson, C., Boström, E., & Granberg, C. (2024). Developing a diagnostic framework for primary and secondary students’ reasoning difficulties during mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115(2), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10278-1

Santos-Trigo, M. (2024). Problem solving in mathematics education: Tracing its foundations and current research-practice trends. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01578-8

Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: De?nitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002

Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press.

Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition and sense of mathematics. In D. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2020). Mathematical practices, in theory and practice. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 52(6), 1163?1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01162-w

Schoenfeld, A.H. (2023). Commentary on Part iii of mathematical challenges for all: On problems, problem-solving, and thinking mathematically. In R. Leikin (Ed.), Mathematical challenges for all. Research in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18868-8_29

Tan, O. S. (2021). Problem-based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Gale Cengage Learning. http://dspace.vnbrims.org:13000/jspui/bitstream/123456789/4228/1/Problem-based%20Learning%20Innovation%20Using%20problems%20to%20power%20learning%20in%20the%2021st%20century.pdf

Tanton, J. (2009). Exploding dots: Advanced version for personal fun. https://aimath.org/~circle/theteacherscircle.org/resources/materials/JTantonExplodingDots_EducatorsVersion.pdf

Tay, Y. K., & Toh, T. L. (2023). A model for scaffolding mathematical problem-solving: From theory to practice. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(2), ep23019. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/13308

Traser, C. J. (2016). Emphasizing the importance of qualitative research in anatomy education: A “How?to?guide” on case study design, implementation, and data analysis. The FASEB Journal, 30, 225–5. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.225.5

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

Willis, L., Shaukat, S., & Low-Choy, S. (2021). Preservice teacher perceptions of preparedness for teaching: Insights from survey research exploring the links between teacher professional standards and agency. British Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 228–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3761


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493