Enhancing Authentic Assessment in Large-Class Design Education Through Authentic Project-Based Learning

Lisa Indriati, Neo Mai, Heidi Yeen-Ju Tan

Abstract


As global economies advance, the cultivation of critical thinking and creativity in higher education is increasingly important for societal and economic progress. Adopting traditional educational methods to larger class sizes where personalized attention is scarce is crucial. This research delves into the fusion of blended and authentic project-based learning by integrating online and face-to-face instruction to immerse students in practical scenarios. The study examines how these integrated methods can improve student engagement, critical thinking, creativity, and proposes an effective assessment system for large-class design education. Drawing from Herrington’s principles of authentic learning and utilizing a mixed-method approach, which includes a Likert scale survey of Design Management students, the research indicates a notable impact of blended and authentic learning on assessment outcomes. The study, presented within the ANABLE (Assessment strategy iN Authentic Blended Learning Environment) framework, emphasizes the enhancements in assessment practices. These improvements enable educators to track learning progress, identify areas needing enhancement, and gauge proficiency levels. The results imply that these pedagogical methods boost learning outcomes by involving students in complex, relevant problems, encouraging deep cognitive engagement, and offering personalized feedback. The findings suggest that these integrated strategies provide practical solutions for large classes, effectively equipping students for contemporary workforce requirements. Enhancing assessment techniques and promoting active learning enhance comprehension and memory retention, develop pertinent skills, foster deeper learning, facilitate fruitful collaboration, and enhance both assessment results and overall student contentment.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.9.22


Keywords


authentic assessment; authentic learning; critical thinking; large classes; project based learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi, S., Firmansyah, G., & Permana, R. (2021). The importance of multimedia technology in PE learning [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology (ISET 2020), November 26, 2021 (pp. 182–185). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211125.034

Amin, M., & Bintang, S. (2020). Blended learning for vocational teacher candidates [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference of Engineering and Implementation on Vocational Education (ACEIVE), November 16, 2019, Universitas Negeri Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-11-2019.2293113

Bostock, S. (1998). Constructivism in mass higher education: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00066

Brooks, S. R. (2022). Teachers’ experiences: Culturally responsive pedagogy, student engagement, and growth achievement [Doctoral dissertation]. St. John’s University, New York.

Deeb, K. (2007). The impact of social technologies on student performance in a collaborative learning environment. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 1(1/2), 121. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtcs.2007.014214

Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5

Fariani, R., Junus, K., & Santoso, H. (2023). Personalised learning in vocational higher education: A model for diverse learners [preprint]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3404282/v1

Fook, C., & Sidhu, G. (2010). Authentic assessment and pedagogical strategies in higher education. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.153.161

Haftador, A. M., Tehranineshat, B., Keshtkaran, Z., & Mohebbi, Z. (2023) A study of the effects of blended learning on university students’ critical thinking: A systematic review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 12(1), Article 95. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_665_22

Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic assessment and multimedia: How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 17(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436980170304

Herrington, J., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2006). Authentic tasks online: A synergy among learner, task, and technology. Distance Education, 27(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600789639

Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 401?412). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_32

Hornsby, D., & Osman, R. (2014). Massification in higher education: Large classes and student learning. Higher Education, 67(6), 711–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9733-1

Hu, J., & Liu, Y. (2023). The scientific basis of authentic assessment and its implementation in English as a foreign language education. SHS Web of Conferences, 174, Article 01023. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317401023

Hussein, B. (2015). A blended learning approach to teaching project management: A model for active participation and involvement: Insights from Norway. Education Sciences, 5(2), 104–125. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5020104

Krismadinata, K., Verawardina, U., Jalinus, N., Rizal, F., Sukardi, Sudira, P., Ramadhani, D., Lubis, A. L., Friadi, J., Rahman Arifin, A. S., & Novaliendry, D. (2020). Blended learning as instructional model in vocational education: Literature review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 5801–5815. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082214

Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091

Matoti, S., & Lenong, B. (2018). Teaching large classes at an institution of higher learning in South Africa [Conference session]. Proceeding of the 40th International Academic Conference, Stockholm. https://doi.org/10.20472/iac.2018.040.044

Matta, B., Guzman, J., Stockly, S., & Widner, B. (2015). Class size effects on student performance in a hispanic-serving institution. The Review of Black Political Economy, 42(4), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-015-9214-5

Mbanga, S. (2023). Enhancing a quality teaching and learning environment in large classes in South African universities: A theoretical exposition. Annals of Social Sciences & Management Studies, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.19080/asm.2023.09.555773

Nickerson, R. S. (2010). How to discourage creative thinking in the classroom. In R. A. Beghetto, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 1?5). Cambridge University Press.

Nida, N., Usodo, B., & Saputro, D. (2020). The blended learning with WhatsApp media on mathematics creative thinking skills and math anxiety. Journal of Education and Learning (Edulearn), 14(2), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i2.16233

Nyagope, T. (2023). Massification at higher education institutions: Challenges associated with teaching large classes and how it impacts the quality of teaching and learning. Al-Mudarris: Journal of Education, 6(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.32478/al-mudarris.v6i2.1842

Okpamen, K. (2024). Psychological implication of large class size on academic staff and students performance in Nigeria tertiary institutions. IJFBM, 2(3), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijfbm.v2i3.1884

Oktaria, S., Sasongko, R., & Kristiawan, M. (2021). Development of blended learning designs using Moodle to support academics of the curriculum in University of Bengkulu. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.4.1.2021.548

Ornellas, A., Falkner, K., & Edman Stålbrandt, E. (2019). Enhancing graduates’ employability skills through authentic learning approaches. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 9(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-04-2018-0049

Pishchukhina, O., & Allen, A. (2021). Supporting learning in large classes: Online formative assessment and automated feedback [Conference session]. 2021 30th Annual Conference of the European Association for Education in Electrical and Information Engineering (EAEEIE), September 10, 2021, Prague, Czech Republic. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/eaeeie50507.2021.9530953

Roshan, A., Gurbaz, M., & Rahmani, S. (2022). The effects of large classes on English language teaching. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 2(2), 38?41. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.2.2.20

Samuel, S. I. (2023). A blended institutional learning approach for the higher education sustainability. EDP Sciences, 156, Article 09002. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315609002

Tunaz, M. (2023). Pre-service ELT teachers’ perspectives of language assessment in emergency distance education. Ekev Akademi Dergisi, 0(93), 330–341. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1202936

Vaughan, N. (2014). Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessment connection. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 4(4), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4040247

Wang, L., & Calvano, L. (2022). Class size, student behaviors and educational outcomes. Organization Management Journal, 19(4), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/omj-01-2021-1139

Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7275/ffb1-mm19

Xian, T. (2021). Course teaching reform research of English academic paper writing for English majors based on blended learning [Conference session]. Proceeding of the 2021 6th International Conference on Modern Management and Education Technology (MMET 2021), October 12, 2021. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211011.091

Xing, B., & Marwala, T. (2017, March 17). Implications of the Fourth Industrial Age on higher education. Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.09643

Yuliyana, M., Rochmiyati, R., & Maulina, D. (2021). Blended learning assessment instrument for elementary school. Edunesia Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(3), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i3.189


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493