Exploring Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of ChatGPT Integration into Physical Sciences Teaching: A Case Study at a Rural South African University
Abstract
The emergence of artificial intelligence, exemplified by generative chatbots such as ChatGPT, has elicited optimism among some educators regarding enhanced teaching and learning methods. Simultaneously, it has raised concerns among others, who perceive these chatbots as being disruptive to established pedagogical norms developed over centuries. This study investigated pre-service teachers’ perceptions regarding integrating ChatGPT into physical sciences teaching at a rural South African university. A case study research design utilizing a qualitative approach was adopted to collect, analyze, and interpret data. This methodology was employed to gain comprehensive insight into the viewpoints held by final year Bachelor of Education Honors physical sciences students serving as pre-service teachers. The study explored the benefits and potential challenges of incorporating emerging technologies such as ChatGPT into physical sciences teaching. The theoretical framework guiding the study was the technological, pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework. Eleven purposively sampled physical sciences pre-service teachers participated in semi-structured interviews. The collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The research findings indicate that ChatGPT has the potential to contribute to the teaching of physical sciences in the areas of lesson planning, preparation, presentation, and formative assessment. However, the study revealed that ChatGPT is unable to answer certain questions in the physical sciences accurately and this was of great concern. These findings shed light on how artificial intelligence generative chatbots can be incorporated into physical sciences learning. The findings provide insights for policymakers, who can facilitate the use of these tools in lesson preparation; science educators, who should leverage the chatbots to enhance learner engagement; and researchers, to help them deepen their understanding of the role of emerging technologies in science education.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.11.24
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
AI for Education. (2023). Effective prompting for educators. https://www.aiforeducation.io/ai-resources/effective-prompting-for-educators
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47, 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y
Baskarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1008
Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). ChatGPT in physics education: A pilot study on easy-to-implement activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep430. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13176
Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational guide. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. David McKay Company. https://ia803005.us.archive.org/15/items/bloometaltaxonomyofeducationalobjectives/Bloom%20et%20al%20-Taxonomy%20of%20Educational%20Objectives.pdf
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cambra-Fierro, J. J., Blasco, M. F., López-Pérez, M.-E. E., & Trifu, A. (2024). ChatGPT adoption and its influence on faculty well-being: An empirical research in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12871-0
Chiu, T. K., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2023). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with artificial intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 3240–3256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044
Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book266033#resources
Deng, J. M., Lalani, Z., McDermaid, L. A., & Szozda, A. R. (2023). Using generative artificial intelligence in chemistry education research: Prioritizing ethical use and accessibility. Journal of Chemical Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-24zfl
Dervi?, D., Glamo?i?, D. S., Gazibegovi?-Busuladži?, A., & Meši?, V. (2018). Teaching physics with simulations: Teacher-centered versus student-centered approaches. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(2), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.288
Elmas, R., Adiguzel-Ulutas, M., & Y?lmaz, M. (2024). Examining ChatGPT’s validity as a source for scientific inquiry and its misconceptions regarding cell energy metabolism. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12749-1
Elsen-Rooney, M. (2023, January 4). NYC education department blocks ChatGPT on school devices, networks. Chalkbeat New York.
https://www.chalkbeat.org/newyork/2023/1/3/23537987/nyc-schools-ban-chatgpt-writing-artificial-intelligence/
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fergus, S., Botha, M., & Ostovar, M. (2023). Evaluating academic answers generated using ChatGPT. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(4), 1672–1675. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00087
Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K., Fuller, S., Singh, M., Arora, P., Parlikad, A. K., Stankovski, V., Abraham, A., Ghosh, S. K., Lutfiyya, H., Kanhere, S. S., Bahsoon, R., Rana, O., Dustdar, S., Sakellariou, R., Uhlig, S., & Buyya, R. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging era of AI chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 19?23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.06.002
Giray, L. (2023). Prompt engineering with ChatGPT: A guide for academic writers. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 51(12), 2629–2633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03272-4
Goldman, S. R., Carreon, A., & Smith, S. J. (2024). Exploring the integration of artificial intelligence into special education teacher preparation through the TPACK framework. Journal of Special Education Preparation, 4(2), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.33043/6zx26bb2
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), Article 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
Hecker, J., & Kalpokas, N. (2024). The ultimate guide to qualitative research – Part 2: Handling qualitative data. ATLAS.ti. https://atlasti.com/guides/qualitative-research-guide-part-2/inductive-vs-deductive-reasoning
Iqbal, M. (2023). AI in education: Personalized learning and adaptive assessment. Cosmic Bulletin of Business Management, 2(1), 280–297. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Falsk-Raza/publication/375722799_AI_in_Education_Personalized_Learning_and_Adaptive_Assessment/links/65586587ce88b87031f25a8f/AI-in-Education-Personalized-Learning-and-Adaptive-Assessment.pdf
Iyamuremye, A., & Ndihokubwayo, K. (2024). Exploring secondary school students’ interest and mastery of atomic structure and chemical bonding through ChatGPT. Educational Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.58197/prbl/9hk37296
Jo, H. (2024). From concerns to benefits: A comprehensive study of ChatGPT usage in education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00471-4
Kodkin, V. L., & Artem’eva, E. V. (2024). ChatGPT: Application in chemistry education and challenges. Journal of Computer and Communications, 12(3), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2024.123012
Lee, G. G., & Zhai, X. (2024). Using ChatGPT for science learning: A study on pre-service teachers’ lesson planning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 17, 1683?1700. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2024.3401457
Lee, H. (2023). The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education. Anatomical Sciences Education 17(5), 926–931. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2270
Leon, A. J., & Vidhani, D. (2023). ChatGPT needs a chemistry tutor too. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(10), 3859–3865. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00288
Liamputtong, P., & Rice, Z. S. (2021). Qualitative research in global health research. In I. Kickbusch, D. Ganten, & M. Moeti (Eds.), Handbook of global health (pp. 213–238). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45009-0_10
Lin, X. (2023). Exploring the role of ChatGPT as a facilitator for motivating self-directed learning among adult learners. Adult Learning, 35(3), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595231184928
Liu, Z., Vobolevich, A., & Oparin, A. (2023). The influence of AI ChatGPT on improving teachers’ creative thinking. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(12), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.12.7
Magaldi, D., & Berler, M. (2020). Semi-structured interviews. In V. Zeigler-Hill, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 4825–4830). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_857
Makrygiannakis, M. A., Giannakopoulos, K., & Kaklamanos, E. G. (2024). Evidence-based potential of generative artificial intelligence large language models in orthodontics: A comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing. European Journal of Orthodontics, 46, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjae017
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mishra, P., Warr, M., & Islam, R. (2023). TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and generative AI. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2247480
Nguyen, G., Nguyen, N., & Giang, N. T. H. (2022). Situation and proposals for implementing artificial intelligence-based instructional technology in Vietnamese secondary schools. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(18), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i18.31503
Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), Article 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783
Reiss, M. J. (2021). The use of Al in education: Practicalities and ethical considerations. London Review of Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/lre.19.1.05
Sharma, S., & Yadav, R. (2022). Chat GPT: A technological remedy or challenge for education system. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 14(4), 46–51. https://gjeis.com/index.php/GJEIS/article/view/698
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Taani, O., & Alabidi, S. (2024). ChatGPT in education: Benefits and challenges of ChatGPT for mathematics and science teaching practices. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2024.2357341
Vandenberg, J., Min, W., Catete, V., Boulden, D., & Mott, B. (2023). Leveraging game design activities for middle grades AI education in rural communities [Conference session]. 18th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582437.3587193
Virvou, M., & Tsihrintzis, G. A. (2023). Is ChatGPT beneficial to education? A holistic evaluation framework based on intelligent tutoring systems. In 2023 14th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iisa59645.2023.10345949
Wark, N., & Ally, M. (2020). An emergent pedagogical framework for integrating emergent technologies. In S. Yu, M. Ally, & A. Tsinakos (Eds.), Emerging technologies and pedagogies in the curriculum (pp. 89–111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0618-5_6
West, J. K., Franz, J. L., Hein, S. M., Leverentz-Culp, H. R., Mauser, J. F., Ruff, E. F., & Zemke, J. M. (2023). An analysis of AI-generated laboratory reports across the chemistry curriculum and student perceptions of ChatGPT. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(11), 4351–4359. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00581
Wijaya, T. T., Su, M., Cao, Y., Weinhandl, R., & Houghton, T. (2024). Examining Chinese preservice mathematics teachers’ adoption of AI chatbots for learning: Unpacking perspectives through the UTAUT2 model. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12837-2
Wollny, S., Schneider, J., di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Rittberger, M., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Are we there yet? – A systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.654924
Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez?Maldonado, R., Chen, G., Li, X., Jin, Y., & Gaševi?, D. (2024). Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13370
Yavuz, A. C. (2020). The effects of differentiated instruction on Turkish students’ L2 achievement, and student and teacher perceptions. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.776002
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493