Development of a Mathematics Module using the 5E Learning Model

Edmar Malsi Paguirigan, Marjorie Janel Ramos Paguirigan

Abstract


In the Philippines’ K to 12 curriculum, primary-grade mathematics modules have been developed in the vernacular language, aligning with the Department of Education’s (DepEd) Mother-Tongue Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) policy. However, these materials are not suited for learners in some elementary schools, including the University of Northern Philippines-Laboratory Schools. Thus, this study aims to describe and develop a valid Grade 1 Module in Mathematics using the 5E Learning Model. This research utilized a descriptive-research and development (R&D) method divided into three phases: planning, designing/developing, and evaluation. The topics were based on the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELC), prescribed by the DepEd. Using the 5E Learning Model (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, Evaluate), the parts of the module were constructed (Link to fun, Let’s start, Let’s Study, Let’s do it, Challenge Yourself) and the English language was used as a medium. The experts evaluated the module, unanimously affirming its validity—based on objectives, content, activities, assessment, and references—and its high quality in terms of relevance, clarity, appropriateness, usefulness, organization, structural design, and timeliness, deeming it an exceptional resource that the learners may use and has the potential to be an effective instructional module for both face-to-face instruction and flexible learning modality. It can help learners understand the basic principles of addition and subtraction while appreciating the module’s visually appealing design and diverse elements.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.11.26


Keywords


5E model; instructional material; mathematics education; module development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, K., Kiazai, A., & Adam, S. (2021). Efficient mathematics teaching and deficient required resources (A case study of District Panjgur). Global Journal for Management and Administrative Sciences, 2(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.46568/gjmas.v2i2.27

Adu, A., & Folson, D. (2023). Effectiveness of 5E instructional model on students’ performance in mathematics non-routine problem. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 17(5), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2023/v17i5482.

Aksan, J. (2021). Effect of modular distance learning approach to academic performance in mathematics of students in Mindanao State University-Sulu Senior High School amidst Covid-19 pandemic. Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4), 445–467. https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v4i2.64

Almazan, J., Jacob, D., Saniatan, C. J., & Galangco, J. (2020). STEM curriculum implementation and academic performance of senior high school students. The Vector: International Journal of Emerging Science, Technology and Management (IJESTM), 29(1). https://doi.org/10.69566/ijestm.v29i1.60

Andini, W., & Suryadi, D. (2017). Student obstacles in solving algebraic thinking problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, Article 012091. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012091

Bakri, S., & Adnan, M. (2021). Effect of 5E learning model on academic achievement in teaching mathematics: Meta-analysis study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2750, Article 040018. https://doi.org/10.17762/TURCOMAT.V12I8.2783

Bayirli, E., Kaygun, A., & Öz, E. (2023). An analysis of PISA 2018 mathematics assessment for Asia-Pacific countries using educational data mining. Mathematics, 11(6), Article 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11061318

Berbesada, H., & Rondina, J. (2022). Blended instructions in the new normal and students learning gains in mathematics. American Journal of Educational Research, 10(6), 398?400. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-10-6-4.

Bernardo, A. B. I., Cordell, M. O., Lapinid, M. R. C., Teves, J. M. M., Yap, S. A., & Chua, U.C. (2022). Contrasting profiles of low-performing mathematics students in public and private schools in the Philippines: Insights from machine learning. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), Article 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030061

Bolkan, S. (2017). Instructor clarity, generative processes, and mastery goals: Examining the effects of signaling on student learning. Communication Education, 66(4), 385?401. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2017.1313438

Brodie, K., Gopal, D., Moodliar, J., & Siala, T. (2021). Bridging powerful knowledge and lived experience: Challenges in teaching mathematics through COVID-19. Pythagoras, 42(1), a593. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v42i1.593

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Cadorna, E. A., Garnace, J. B., Molina, J. T., Domondon, C. S., & Galangco, J. E. (2023). Development of technostress scale for Filipino students using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Namibian Studies, 33, 5459–5478. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v33i.3223

Dangur-Levy, S., Andersen, R., & Holm, A. (2023). Sources of mathematics self-efficacy: The interactive role of parental education and perceptions of teachers. Canadian Review of Sociology, 60(4), 668–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12454

Domondon, C., Corpuz, M. J., Carranza, M., Moroki, I., Ching, F., & Elipane, L. (2024). Reflexões sobre proporção e proporção de ensino usando lesson study [Lesson study reflections: Enhancing ratio and proportion instruction in a Philippine school setting]. Diversitas Journal, 9(1_Special). https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9i1_Special.2834

Fabrigas, J. P, & Taban, J. G. (2023). Contextualization and localization of teaching mathematics in the new normal. The Asian Journal of Education and Human Development (AJEHD), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.69566/ajehd.v4i1.74

Guido, R. (2014). Evaluation of a Modular Teaching Approach in Materials Science and Engineering. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(11). 1126-1130. https://doi: 10.12691/education-2-11-20.

Hariyanto, Joyoatmojo, S., Nurkamto, J., & Gunarhadi. (2019). Developing inquiry-based learning materials to promote students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.18.1.4

Ingram, J., Stiff, J., Cadwallader, S., Lee, G., & Kayton, H. (2023). PISA 2022: National report for England. Department for Education. https://www.ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:f90b59cc-1b5c-4c53-bb1b-26e936c4449a/files/sw3763843g

Kaur, W., Balakrishnan, V., Chen, Y., & Periasamy, J. (2022). Mental health risk factors and coping strategies among students in Asia Pacific during COVID-19 pandemic: Scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), Article 8894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19158894

Lockheed, M., Prokic-Bruer, T., & Shadrova, A. (2015). The experience of middle-income countries participating in PISA 2000–2015. PISA; World Bank; D.C./OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264246195-en

Lule, A. (2022). Illustration is an effective teaching aid in the Process of learning. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Innovations and Research in Technology and Engineering. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4113697

Matorevhu, A. (2023). Curriculum innovation implementation for industrialization: A case of Education 5.0 pre-service science and mathematics teacher preparation. Journal of Research in Instructional, 3(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v3i1.214

Parviainen, P., Eklund, K., Koivula, M., Liinamaa, T., & Rutanen, N. (2022). Teaching early mathematical skills to 3- to 7-year-old children: Differences related to mathematical skill category, children’s age group and teachers’ characteristics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(7), 1961–1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10341-y

Polanin, J. R., Austin, M., Taylor, J. A., Steingut, R. R., Rodgers, M. A., & Williams, R. (2024). Effects of the 5E Instructional Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AERA Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241269866

Putra, J. (2017). Learning cycle 5E dalam meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan self-regulated learning matematika (5E learning cycle in improving ability in mathematics communication and mathematics self-regulated learning). Jurnal PRISMA Universitas Suryakancana, 6(1), 44-56. https://doi.org/ 10.35194/jp.v6i1.27

Rebecca, B., Csikari, M., Freeman S., & Rodriguez, M. (2022). Writing and Using Learning Objectives. CBE—Life Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-04-0073

Reyes, F., & Caballes, D. (2021). A review on the school-based learning activity sheet towards improvement of instructional material. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 11(8), 200–204. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.11.08.2021.p11627

Sagge, R., & Espiritu, E. (2023). Project DESMOS: Development and Evaluation of Self-directed Module in Statistics and Probability. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.01.06.

Sana, F., Forrin, N., Sharma, M., Dubljevic, T., Ho, P., Jalil, E., & Kim, J. (2020). Optimizing the efficacy of learning objectives through pretests. CBE Life Sciences Education, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0257

Santini, A. (2018). The importance of referencing. The Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 4(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2018-0002

Talimodao, A., & Madrigal, D. (2021). Printed modular distance learning in Philippine public elementary schools in time of COVID-19 pandemic: Quality, implementation, and challenges. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(3), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v4i3.391

Tan-Espinar, M. J. F., & Ballado, R. S. (2017). Content validity and acceptability of a developed worktext in Basic Mathematics 2. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 72–84.

https://www.apjmr.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/APJMR-2017.5.1.10.pdf

Thevenot, C., Tazouti, Y., Billard, C., Dewi, J., & Fayol, M. (2023). Acquisition of new arithmetic skills based on prior arithmetic skills: A cross-sectional study in primary school from Grade 2 to Grade 5. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 727–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12588

Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements, 2(4), i–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092987

Torres, R. A. O., & Ortega-Dela Cruz, R. A. (2022). Remote learning: Challenges and opportunities for educators and students in the new normal. Anatolian Journal of Education, 7(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2022.717a


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493