The Influence of a Digital Professional Development Program on Enhancing Thai Teachers’ Learning in Teaching Science Literacy
Abstract
This qualitative case study investigated the learning process of Thai in-service science teachers as they studied science literacy. This learning process was conducted in the form of a professional development program delivered on digital platforms. The program’s design relied on adult learning and pedagogical content knowledge theories and included four phases: knowledge of science literacy, knowledge of pedagogy, integration between knowledge and lessons, and practice in lesson planning. The teachers were selected by a non-probability purposeful sampling technique and participated in the six-day program on weekends. Data from a focus group interview, thirty lesson plans, and ten individual interviews were analysed through conventional content analysis and triangulation techniques. The findings illustrated that the teachers had prior knowledge about scientific literacy but could not completely adapt it to plan effective lessons. However, through inquiry-based approaches such as receiving feedback, sharing lessons, and a community workshop, nine teachers appeared to improve their own lessons by connecting global issues to scientific concepts and local contexts. The findings recommend the use of reflective journals and classroom observations in school settings to obtain more details about teachers’ learning and promote sustainable development of teaching science literacy.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.12.18
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
AbdulRab, H. (2023). Teacher professional development in the 21st century. African Journal of Education and Practice, 9(4), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.47604/ajep.2237
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press.
Annetta, L. A., & Shymansky, J. A. (2006). Investigating science learning for rural elementary school teachers in a professional-development project through three distance-education strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1019?1039. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20106
Asiyah, A., Febrini, D., Topano, A., Mustamin, A. A., & Hakim, M. A. (2024). Measuring the impact of Islamic values-based scientific literacy on scientific competency of madrasah teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(4), 476–496. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.4.25
Barr, S., & Askell-Williams, H. (2020). Changes in teachers’ epistemic cognition about self–regulated learning as they engaged in a researcher-facilitated professional learning community. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1599098
Bom, P., Koopman, M., & Beijaard, D. (2019). Student teachers’ use of data feedback for improving their teaching skills in science and technology in primary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/6285
Budiman, I., Kaniawati, I., Permanasari, A., & Lukmana, I. (2021). Teachers’ perspective on scientific literacy in science learning: Descriptive survey. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(Special Issue), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1123
Carlson, J., Daehler, K. R., Alonzo, A. C., Barendsen, E., Berry, A., Borowski, A., Carpendale, J., Chan, K. K. H., Cooper, R., Friedrichsen, P., Gess-Newsome, J., Henze-Rietveld, I., Hume, A., Kirschner, S., Liepertz, S., Loughran, J., Mavhunga, E., Neumann, K., Nilsson, P., … Wilson, D. D. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 77–94). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_2
Chandler-Olcott, K., & Dotger, S. (2023). Leveraging lesson study for disciplinary literacy: Studying and planning for scientific modelling. Reading Teacher, 76(6), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2199
Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualisation of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Faikhamta, C., Ketsing, J., Tanak, A., & Chamrat, S. (2018). Science teacher education in Thailand: A challenging journey. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0021-8
Fantacone, D., Wang, Q., & Radloff, J. (2024). Science and mathematics teachers’ views of the characteristics of effective professional development: A Q methodological study. Research Issues in Contemporary Education, 9(1), 77–113. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1427015.pdf
Farnsworth, V., Kleanthous, I., & Wenger-Trayner, E. (2016). Communities of practice as a social theory of learning: A conversation with Etienne Wenger. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1133799
Fensham, P. J. (2007). Competences, from within and without: New challenges and possibilities for scientific literacy. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, & P. Wickman (Eds.), Proceedings promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction (pp. 113–119). Uppsala University.
Fransson, G., & Norman, F. (2021). Exploring how a digitally skilled teacher’s self-understanding influences his professional learning strategies: A research cooperation between a teacher and a researcher. Teacher Development, 25(4), 432?448. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2021.1891131
Gregson, J. A., & Sturko, P. A. (2007). Teachers as adult learners: Re-conceptualizing professional development. Journal of Adult Education, 36(1), 1–18. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ891061.pdf
Hanfstingl, B., Gnambs, T., Porsch, R., & Jude, N. (2023). Exploring the association between non-specialized science teacher rates and student science literacy: An analysis of PISA data across 18 nations. International Journal of Science Education, 46(9), 874–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2262729
Hudson, P. (2014). Feedback consistencies and inconsistencies: Eight mentors’ observations on one preservice teacher’s lesson. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.801075
Izhar, N. A., Al-Dheleai, Y. M., & Ishak, N. A. (2021). Education continuation strategies during COVID-19 in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 1423–1436. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i4/9840
Jacobs, C. L., Martin, S. N., & Otieno, T. C. (2008). A science lesson plan analysis instrument for formative and summative program evaluation of a teacher education program. Science Education, 92(6), 1096–1126. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20277
Kaptan, K., & Timurlenk, O. (2012). Challenges for science education. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 51, 763–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.237
Kleinknecht, M., & Gröschner, A. (2016). Fostering preservice teachers’ noticing with structured video feedback: Results of an online- and video-based intervention study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.020
Knowles, M., Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., Holton III, E. F., Robinson, P. A., Swanson, R. A., Swanson, R., & Robinson, P. A. (2020). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (9th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299612
Lichtman, M. (2023). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide (4th ed.). Routledge.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Corwin Press.
Mackenzie, A. H., Rademaker, K., Lindeman, P., Shugart, E., & Iammartino, C. (2023). Editor’s corner: Promoting scientific literacy in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 90(5), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434871.2023.12290275
Mavuso, M. P., Olawumi, K. B., Khalo, X., Kafu-Quvane, B., & Mzilikazi, B. (2022). Implementation of teacher capacitation programs to integrate climate change education: The case study of geography teaching in South African secondary schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(11), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.11.5
McFarlane, D. A. (2013). Understanding the challenges of science education in the 21st century: New opportunities for scientific literacy. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 4, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.4.35
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey Bass.
Musikul, K. (2007). Professional development for primary science teaching in Thailand: Knowledge, orientations, and practices of professional developers and professional development participants [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Missouri, Columbia. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/professional-development-primary-science-teaching/docview/304841720/se-2
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4962.
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
Office of the Basic Education Commission (Thailand). (2022, July 26). K?r xbrm cheing pt?ib?ti k?r k?r ph?t?hn? khw?m r?? khw?m k?hê?c? n? rabb PISA-Style Online Testing s??h?r?b khr? p?h?? s?xn p?h??n r?p bæb xxnl?n? [Workshop on developing knowledge and understanding of PISA-Style Online Testing system for teachers via online format]. https://www.obec.go.th/archives/665652
Office of the Education Council (Thailand). (2017). P?hænk?r ???ks??? h?æ?ng ch?ti ph.??.2560-2579 [The National Education Plan B.E. 2560-2579 (2017–2036)]. Office of the Education Council. https://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/sites/default/files/ressources/thailand_educationplan.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2005). PISA 2003 Technical Report. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264010543-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Pan, C. (2017). On scientific literacy development: Exploring challenges of science teaching in elementary school teachers [Master’s thesis]. University of Toronto. TSpace Repository. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/77142
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Poonputta, A., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2024). A model framework for enhancing twenty-first century competencies in primary school teachers within northeastern Thailand’s sub-area. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(1), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.6
Qablan, A. (2016) Teaching and learning about science practices: Insights and challenges in professional development. Teacher Development, 20(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1111929
Rivard, L. P., & Gueye, N. R. (2016) Enhancing literacy practices in science classrooms through a professional development program for Canadian minority-language teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1150–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1183267
Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Volume II, pp. 545–558). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X0150020
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reforms. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Unal-Coban, G., Kocagul, M., Akpinar, E., & Baran, B. (2022). Examining science teachers’ performances at planning geology lesson through TPACK-based argumentation practices. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(4), 907–937. http://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1110596
Utami, B., Saputro, S., Ashadi, A., & Masykurib, M. (2016). Scientific literacy in science lesson. PROSIDING ICTTE FKIP UNS, 1(1), 125–133. https://core.ac.uk/reader/289793244
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493